Cited by 60Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesPregnancy and Medication Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Breastfeeding, ovulatory years, and risk of multiple sclerosis

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether women who breastfeed their infants longer or have fewer ovulatory years are at lower risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We recruited women with newly diagnosed MS or its precursor, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 397), and matched controls (n = 433) into the MS Sunshine Study from the membership of Kaiser Permanente Southern California. A structured in-person questionnaire was administered to collect the behavioral (pregnancies, breastfeeding, hormonal contraceptive use) and biological (age at menarche and menopause, amenorrhea) factors to make up ovulatory years. Results: Among women who had live births, a cumulative duration of breastfeeding for ≥15 months was associated with a reduced risk of MS/CIS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.77; p = 0.003 compared to 0–4 months of breastfeeding). Being ≥15 years of age at menarche was also associated with a lower risk of MS/CIS (adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.96; p = 0.035). Total ovulatory years and the remaining factors that determine it, including gravidity, parity, episodes of amenorrhea, and hormonal contraceptive use, as well as age at first birth, showed no significant association with the risk of MS/CIS. Conclusions: Mothers who breastfeed longer may be at lower subsequent risk of developing multiple sclerosis. This is consistent with the other known maternal health benefits of breastfeeding and with our previous observation that women with MS who breastfeed exclusively are at lower risk of postpartum relapses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004207

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 60

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824c4648 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1352458513481397 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/archneur.62.9.1362 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1352458513498126 · DOI
  5. 10.1212/WNL.55.6.848 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jnnp.30.4.354 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/brain/118.1.253 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90088-O · DOI
  9. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821c7adc · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02431.x · DOI
  11. 10.1191/135248506ms1267oa · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10008.x · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149094 · DOI
  14. 10.1136/bmj.39521.566296.BE · DOI
  15. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.132 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1806 · DOI
  17. 10.1056/NEJM199807303390501 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.7812/TPP/12-031 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822facdd · DOI
  20. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182918cc2 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1055/s-2007-1019132 · DOI
  23. 10.1212/WNL.59.4.499 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116427 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/aje/kwi046 · DOI
  27. 10.1001/jama.294.20.2601 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.304 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1352458512459683 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s00415-015-7704-9 · DOI
  31. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o077.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Langer-Gould, A., Smith, J. B., Hellwig, K., Gonzales, E., Haraszti, S., Koebnick, C., & Xiang, A.
Affiliations
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2017-08-08
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
563-569
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2735207299
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS075308)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, breastfeeding duration, age at menarche, clinically isolated syndrome, postpartum relapse, hormonal contraceptive use, amenorrhea, parity, age at first birth
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, California, Female, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Reproductive Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review