The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Breastfeeding, ovulatory years, and risk of multiple sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To determine whether women who breastfeed their infants longer or have fewer ovulatory years are at lower risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We recruited women with newly diagnosed MS or its precursor, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 397), and matched controls (n = 433) into the MS Sunshine Study from the membership of Kaiser Permanente Southern California. A structured in-person questionnaire was administered to collect the behavioral (pregnancies, breastfeeding, hormonal contraceptive use) and biological (age at menarche and menopause, amenorrhea) factors to make up ovulatory years. Results: Among women who had live births, a cumulative duration of breastfeeding for ≥15 months was associated with a reduced risk of MS/CIS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.77; p = 0.003 compared to 0–4 months of breastfeeding). Being ≥15 years of age at menarche was also associated with a lower risk of MS/CIS (adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.96; p = 0.035). Total ovulatory years and the remaining factors that determine it, including gravidity, parity, episodes of amenorrhea, and hormonal contraceptive use, as well as age at first birth, showed no significant association with the risk of MS/CIS. Conclusions: Mothers who breastfeed longer may be at lower subsequent risk of developing multiple sclerosis. This is consistent with the other known maternal health benefits of breastfeeding and with our previous observation that women with MS who breastfeed exclusively are at lower risk of postpartum relapses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Environmental changes that might be contributing to the rapid change in incidence among women include the rise in obesity, increased cigarette smoking, and changes in the frequency of breastfeeding infants.31, 33”
From Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 60
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824c4648 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458513481397 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.62.9.1362 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458513498126 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.55.6.848 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.30.4.354 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/118.1.253 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90088-O · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821c7adc · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02431.x · DOI
- 10.1191/135248506ms1267oa · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10008.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0149094 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.39521.566296.BE · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2009.132 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1806 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199807303390501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7812/TPP/12-031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822facdd · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182918cc2 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-2007-1019132 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.59.4.499 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116427 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/aje/kwi046 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.294.20.2601 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archneurol.2009.304 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458512459683 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00415-015-7704-9 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o077.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Langer-Gould, A., Smith, J. B., Hellwig, K., Gonzales, E., Haraszti, S., Koebnick, C., & Xiang, A.
- Affiliations
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2017-08-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 563-569
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC5562955
- OpenAlex
- W2735207299
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS075308)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, breastfeeding duration, age at menarche, clinically isolated syndrome, postpartum relapse, hormonal contraceptive use, amenorrhea, parity, age at first birth
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Feeding, California, Female, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Reproductive Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review