Cited by 789Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealth disparities and outcomesMedical Coding and Health Information

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Members of a Large, Integrated Health Care System: Comparison with US Census Bureau Data

Open access
Koebnick, Corinna, Langer-Gould, Annette M, Gould, Michael K, Chao, Chun R, Iyer, Rajan L, Smith, Ning, Chen, Wansu, Jacobsen, Steven J·2012·The Permanente Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data from the memberships of large, integrated health care systems can be valuable for clinical, epidemiologic, and health services research, but a potential selection bias may threaten the inference to the population of interest. METHODS: We reviewed administrative records of members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) in 2000 and 2010, and we compared their sociodemographic characteristics with those of the underlying population in the coverage area on the basis of US Census Bureau data. RESULTS: We identified 3,328,579 KPSC members in 2000 and 3,357,959 KPSC members in 2010, representing approximately 16% of the population in the coverage area. The distribution of sex and age of KPSC members appeared to be similar to the census reference population in 2000 and 2010 except with a slightly higher proportion of 40 to 64 year olds. The proportion of Hispanics/Latinos was comparable between KPSC and the census reference population (37.5% vs 38.2%, respectively, in 2000 and 45.2% vs 43.3% in 2010). However, KPSC members included more blacks (14.9% vs 7.0% in 2000 and 10.8% vs 6.5% in 2010). Neighborhood educational levels and neighborhood household incomes were generally similar between KPSC members and the census reference population, but with a marginal underrepresentation of individuals with extremely low income and high education. CONCLUSIONS: The membership of KPSC reflects the socioeconomic diversity of the Southern California census population, suggesting that findings from this setting may provide valid inference for clinical, epidemiologic, and health services research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7812/tpp/12-031

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Getahun D, Fassett MJ, Jacobsen SJ. Gesta- tional diabetes: risk of recurrence in subse- quent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 Nov;203(5):467.
  2. Smith N, Iyer RL, Langer-Gould AM, et al. Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children. BMC Health Serv Res 2010 Nov 23;10:316.
  3. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Re- search Prioritization. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washing- ton, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koebnick, C., Langer-Gould, A. M., Gould, M. K., Chao, C. R., Iyer, R. L., Smith, N., Chen, W., & Jacobsen, S. J.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
The Permanente Journal
Published
2012-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
37-41
ISSN
  • 1552-5767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5775
OpenAlex
W1980040599
Cited by
789
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 1
FWCI
82.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Permanente Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, integrated health system, selection bias, sociodemographic factors, Hispanic/Latino populations, racial and ethnic representation, household income, educational attainment, Southern California
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Black or African American, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Trials as Topic, Data Collection, Educational Status, Family Characteristics, Female, Health Services Research, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Income, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Patient Selection, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Censuses, Black People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review