Cited by 135Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsCoffee research and impactsDeep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caffeine as symptomatic treatment for Parkinson disease (Café-PD): A randomized trial

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of caffeine on Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: In this multicenter parallel-group controlled trial, patients with PD with 1-8 years disease duration, Hoehn & Yahr stages I-III, on stable symptomatic therapy were randomized to caffeine 200 mg BID vs matching placebo capsules for 6-18 months. The primary research question was whether objective motor scores would differ at 6 months (Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS]-III, Class I evidence). Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability, motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS-II), motor fluctuations, sleep, nonmotor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS-I), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and quality of life. RESULTS: Sixty patients received caffeine and 61 placebo. Caffeine was well-tolerated with similar prevalence of side effects as placebo. There was no improvement in motor parkinsonism (the primary outcome) with caffeine treatment compared to placebo (difference between groups -0.48 [95% confidence interval -3.21 to 2.25] points on MDS-UPDRS-III). Similarly, on secondary outcomes, there was no change in motor signs or motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS-II) at any time point, and no difference on quality of life. There was a slight improvement in somnolence over the first 6 months, which attenuated over time. There was a slight increase in dyskinesia with caffeine (MDS-UPDRS-4.1+4.2 = 0.25 points higher), and caffeine was associated with worse cognitive testing scores (average Montreal Cognitive Assessment = 0.66 [0.01, 1.32] worse than placebo). CONCLUSION: Caffeine did not provide clinically important improvement of motor manifestations of PD (Class I evidence). Epidemiologic links between caffeine and lower PD risk do not appear to be explained by symptomatic effects. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01738178. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with PD, caffeine does not significantly improve motor manifestations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004568

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1002/ana.23687 · DOI
  2. 10.1212/WNL.58.8.1154 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/mds.23873 · DOI
  4. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318263570d · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00369-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1212/WNL.57.8.1497 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0278-6915(95)00093-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/mds.22340 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/sleep/26.8.1049 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/mds.25037 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1001/jama.287.4.455 · DOI
  15. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2268 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s40263-014-0161-7 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.10.006 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/mds.20914 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/mds.25319 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/ene.12751 · DOI
  21. 10.3233/JAD-2010-091315 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00314-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000879 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Postuma, R. B., Anang, J., Pelletier, A., Joseph, L., Moscovich, M., Grimes, D., Furtado, S., Munhoz, R. P., Appel-Cresswell, S., Moro, A., Borys, A., Hobson, D., & Lang, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • From the Department of Neurology, Montreal General Hospital (R.B.P., A.P.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (L.J.), McGill University, Montreal; Department of Neurology (J.A., A.B., D.H.), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; Pontifical Catholic University of Parana (M.M., A.M.), Curitiba, Brazil; Department of Neurology (D.G.), Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Research Institute; Department of Neurology (S.F.), University of Calgary; Division of Neurology ...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2017-10-24
Volume
89
Issue
17
Pages
1795-1803
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2757416164
Cited by
135
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
Keywords
caffeine, Parkinson's disease, symptomatic treatment, motor symptoms, dyskinesia, cognitive function, sleep, quality of life, non-motor symptoms, motor fluctuations
MeSH terms
Aged, Antiparkinson Agents, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review