Cited by 68Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood pressure and dementia: What the SPRINT-MIND trial adds and what we still need to know

Open access
Peters, Ruth, Warwick, Jane, Anstey, Kaarin J., Anderson, Craig S.·2019·Neurology

Abstract

High blood pressure (BP) has been associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, stroke, and Alzheimer disease pathology. Epidemiologic studies are consistent in showing that high BP, particularly in midlife, is a risk factor for the development of dementia in late life. However, supporting randomized evidence of the inference that BP-lowering therapy can prevent dementia has been slow in coming over the last 30 years. The most recent randomized trial, the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial—Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension (SPRINT-MIND), therefore, makes a pivotal contribution to the field, reemphasizing broader public health benefits of BP lowering and directing future research.1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007543

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Peters, R., Warwick, J., Anstey, K. J., & Anderson, C. S.
Affiliations
The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2019-05-21
Volume
92
Issue
21
Pages
1017-1018
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2940519437
Cited by
68
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DRYAD (public-domain)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PDF-2012-05-197)
  • Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Institute for Dementia Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
blood pressure, hypertension, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, cerebrovascular disease, stroke, midlife blood pressure, blood pressure-lowering therapy, dementia prevention, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Dementia, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review