The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frequency of Asymptomatic Optic Nerve Enhancement in a Large Retrospective Cohort of Patients With Aquaporin-4+ NMOSD
Open accessAbstract
Background and Objectives Asymptomatic or persistent optic nerve enhancement in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is thought to be rare. Improved understanding may have important implications for assessment of treatment efficacy in clinical trials and in clinical practice. Our objective was to characterize NMOSD interattack optic nerve enhancement. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study performed between 2000 and 2019 (median follow-up 5.5 [range 1–35] years) of patients with AQP4-IgG–positive optic neuritis (ON) evaluated at Mayo Clinic. MRI orbits were reviewed by a neuroradiologist, neuro-ophthalmologist, and neuroimmunologist blinded to the clinical history. Interattack optic nerve enhancement (>30 days after attack) was measured. The correlation between interattack enhancement and Snellen visual acuity (VA), converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), at attack and at follow-up were assessed. Results A total of 198 MRI scans in 100 patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD were identified, with 107 interattack MRIs from 78 unique patients reviewed. Seven scans were performed before any ON (median 61 days before attack [range 21–271 days]) and 100 after ON (median 400 days after attack [33–4,623 days]). Optic nerve enhancement was present on 18/107 (16.8%) interattack scans (median 192.5 days from attack [33–2,943]) of patients with preceding ON. On 15 scans, enhancement occurred at the site of prior attacks; the lesion location was unchanged, but the lesion length was shorter. Two scans (1.8%) demonstrated new asymptomatic lesions (prior scan demonstrated no enhancement). In a third patient with subjective blurry vision, MRI showed enhancement preceding detectable eye abnormalities on examination noted 15 days later. There was no difference in VA at preceding attack nadir (logMAR VA 1.7 vs 2.1; p = 0.79) or long-term VA (logMAR VA 0.4 vs 0.2, p = 0.56) between those with and without interattack optic nerve enhancement. Discussion Asymptomatic optic nerve enhancement occurred in 17% of patients with NMOSD predominantly at the site of prior ON attacks and may represent intermittent blood-brain barrier breakdown or subclinical ON. New asymptomatic enhancement was seen only in 2% of patients. Therapeutic clinical trials for NMOSD require blinded relapse adjudication when assessing treatment efficacy, and it is important to recognize that asymptomatic optic nerve enhancement can occur in patients with ON.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Of note, asymptomatic optic nerve lesions detected with MRI are rarely seen in NMOSD or MOGAD. 67,68”
From The use of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cree, B. A. C., Bennett, J. L., Kim, H. J., Weinshenker, B. G., Pittock, S. J., Wingerchuk, D. M., Fujihara, K., Paul, F., Cutter, G. R., Marignier, R., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31817-3 · Cited by 756
Self-citationGoronzy, J. J., & Weyand, C. M. (2012) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-012-0970-0 · Cited by 292
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000104 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010847 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.63.3.390 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1901747 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1900866 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30392-6 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13063-017-1995-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/114.6.2437 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.020 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awz054 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saidha, S., Green, A. J., Leocani, L., Vidal-Jordana, A., Kenney, R. C., Bsteh, G., Outteryck, O., Thompson, A., Montalban, X., Coetzee, T., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00275-3 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, S. S., Morris, P., Buciuc, M., Tajfirouz, D., Wingerchuk, D. M., Weinshenker, B. G., Eggenberger, E. R., Di Nome, M., Pittock, S. J., Flanagan, E. P., Bhatti, M. T., & Chen, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- From the Department of Neurology (S.S.S., M.B., D.T., B.G.W., S.J.P., E.P.F., M.T.B., J.J.C.), and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology (S.S.S., M.B., D.M.W., B.G.W., S.J.P., E.P.F., J.J.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.S.S.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN; Department of Radiology (P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (D.M.W.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Department of Ophthalmology (E.R.E.), Mayo Clinic,...
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2022-08-23
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e851-e857
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC9484733
- OpenAlex
- W4282831284
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Keywords
- neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, aquaporin-4 antibodies, optic nerve enhancement, asymptomatic lesions, optic neuritis, visual acuity, visual field defects, treatment efficacy assessment, disease activity monitoring, relapse prevention, recurrence prediction
- MeSH terms
- Autoantibodies, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Neuromyelitis Optica, Optic Nerve, Optic Neuritis, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Aquaporin 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review