The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective validation of the ICH Score for 12-month functional outcome
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The ICH Score is a commonly used clinical grading scale for outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and has been validated for 30-day mortality, but not long-term functional outcome. The goals of this study were to assess whether the ICH Score accurately stratifies patients with regard to 12-month functional outcome and to further delineate the pace of recovery of patients during the first year post-ICH. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational cohort study of all patients with acute ICH admitted to the emergency departments of San Francisco General Hospital and UCSF Medical Center from June 1, 2001, through May 31, 2004. Components of the ICH Score (admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, initial hematoma volume, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, infratentorial ICH origin, and age) were recorded along with other clinical characteristics. Patients were then assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge, 30 days, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-ICH. RESULTS: Of 243 patients, 95 (39%) died during initial acute hospitalization. The ICH Score accurately stratified patients with regard to 12-month functional outcome for various dichotomous cutpoints along the mRS (p < 0.05). Many patients continued to improve across the first year, with a small number of patients becoming disabled or dying due to late events unrelated to the initial ICH. CONCLUSIONS: The ICH Score is a valid clinical grading scale for long-term functional outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Many ICH patients improve after hospital discharge and this improvement may continue even after 6 months post-ICH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Mayer, S. A., Brun, N. C., Begtrup, K., Broderick, J., Davis, S., Diringer, M. N., Skolnick, B. E., & Steiner, T. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707534 · Cited by 1,255
Cited by
Plasma neurofilament light predicts mortality in patients with stroke
Gendron, T. F., Badi, M. K., Heckman, M. G., Jansen-West, K. R., Vilanilam, G. K., Johnson, P. W., Burch, A. R., Walton, R. L., Ross, O. A., Brott, T. G., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aay1913 · Cited by 92
Postoperative Stroke After Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: Hemorrhage Versus Ischemia
Lin, C., Lee, C., Lee, H., Wu, M., Tseng, C., Tsai, F., & Lin, Y. (2022) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-021-06375-y · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemphill, J. C., Farrant, M., & Neill, T. A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2009-10-06
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1088-1094
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2145131109
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective validation of the ICH Score for 12-month functional outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181b8b332
- The paper
- Hemphill, J. C., Farrant, M., & Neill, T. A. (2009). Prospective validation of the ICH Score for 12-month functional outcome. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181b8b332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.