Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 631

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retrospective analysis of NMDA receptor antibodies in encephalitis of unknown origin

Prüss, H., Dalmau, J., Harms, L., Höltje, M., Ahnert-Hilger, G., Borowski, K., Stoecker, W., Wandinger, K.P.·2010·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-NMDA-receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe disorder that occurs in association with antibodies to the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR and results in a characteristic syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To determine in a single institution setting whether patients previously diagnosed with encephalitis of unknown origin had anti-NMDAR encephalitis. METHODS: Charts of 505 patients aged 18 to 35 years admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed for criteria of encephalitis of unknown etiology. These included encephalitic signs with psychiatric symptoms (agitation, paranoid thoughts, irritability, or hallucinations); seizures; CSF inflammation; and exclusion of viral or bacterial infection. Archived serum and CSF samples of patients fulfilling these criteria were examined for NMDAR antibodies. Follow-up visits allowed the analysis of the natural disease course and estimation of prognosis. RESULTS: Seven patients (all women) fulfilled the indicated criteria; 6 of them had NMDAR antibodies. Ovarian teratomas were detected in 2 patients, in one 3 years after the onset of encephalitis. Outcome was favorable in all patients. One patient without teratoma improved spontaneously along with disappearance of NMDAR antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis represented 1% of all young patients' admissions to the ICU. Six of 7 cases with the indicated clinical criteria had anti-NMDAR encephalitis. NMDAR antibodies should be tested in all patients with encephalitis who fulfill these criteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181fc2a06

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 631

Metadata

Authors
Prüss, H., Dalmau, J., Harms, L., Höltje, M., Ahnert-Hilger, G., Borowski, K., Stoecker, W., & Wandinger, K. P.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2010-11-09
Volume
75
Issue
19
Pages
1735-1739
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2065299477
Cited by
631
References
3
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrospective analysis of NMDA receptor antibodies in encephalitis of unknown origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181fc2a06
The paper
Prüss, H., Dalmau, J., Harms, L., Höltje, M., Ahnert-Hilger, G., Borowski, K., Stoecker, W., & Wandinger, K. P. (2010). Retrospective analysis of NMDA receptor antibodies in encephalitis of unknown origin. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181fc2a06

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.