The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Different double inversion recovery (DIR) sequences are currently used in multiple sclerosis (MS) research centers to visualize cortical lesions, making it difficult to compare published data. This study aimed to formulate consensus recommendations for scoring cortical lesions in patients with MS, using DIR images acquired in 6 European centers according to local protocols. METHODS: Consensus recommendations were formulated and tested in a multinational meeting. RESULTS: Cortical lesions were defined as focal abnormalities on DIR, hyperintense compared to adjacent normal-appearing gray matter, and were not scored unless ≥ 3 pixels in size, based on at least 1.0 mm(2) in-plane resolution. Besides these 2 obligatory criteria, additional, supportive recommendations concerned a priori artifact definition on DIR, use of additional MRI contrasts to verify suspected lesions, and a constant level of displayed image contrast. Robustness of the recommendations was tested in a small dataset of available, heterogeneous DIR images, provided by the different participating centers. An overall moderate agreement was reached when using the proposed recommendations: more than half of the readers agreed on slightly more than half (54%) of the cortical lesions scored, whereas complete agreement was reached in 19.4% of the lesions (usually larger, mixed white matter/gray matter lesions). CONCLUSIONS: Although not designed as a formal interobserver study, the current study suggests that comparing available literature data on cortical lesions may be problematic, and increased consistency in acquisition protocols may improve scoring agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of the proposed recommendations should now be studied in a more formal, prospective, multicenter setting using similar DIR protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peterson, J. W., Bö, L., Mörk, S., Chang, A., & Trapp, B. D. (2001) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.1123 · Cited by 1,403
Subpial Demyelination in the Cerebral Cortex of Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Bø, L., Vedeler, C. A., Nyland, H. I., Trapp, B. D., & Mørk, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/62.7.723 · Cited by 757
Cited by
MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines
Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Ciccarelli, O., De Stefano, N., Evangelou, N., Kappos, L., Rovira, A., Sastre-Garriga, J., Tintorè, M., Frederiksen, J. L., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00393-2 · Cited by 880
Self-citationWattjes, M. P., Ciccarelli, O., Reich, D. S., Banwell, B., de Stefano, N., Enzinger, C., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Frederiksen, J., Gasperini, C., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00095-8 · Cited by 674
Self-citationClinical and imaging assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Rocca, M. A., Amato, M. P., De Stefano, N., Enzinger, C., Geurts, J. J., Penner, I.-K., Rovira, A., Sumowski, J. F., Valsasina, P., & Filippi, M. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70250-9 · Cited by 557
Self-citationAssociation between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis
Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Barkhof, F., Brück, W., Chen, J. T., Comi, G., DeLuca, G., De Stefano, N., Erickson, B. J., Evangelou, N., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70003-0 · Cited by 486
Self-citationon behalf of the MAGNIMS study group (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.157 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Geurts, J. J. G., Roosendaal, S. D., Calabrese, M., Ciccarelli, O., Agosta, F., Chard, D. T., Gass, A., Huerga, E., Moraal, B., Pareto, D., Rocca, M. A., Wattjes, M. P., Yousry, T. A., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., & Barkhof, F.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 418-424
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2005889577
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820a0cc4
- The paper
- Geurts, J. J. G., Roosendaal, S. D., Calabrese, M., Ciccarelli, O., Agosta, F., Chard, D. T., Gass, A., Huerga, E., Moraal, B., Pareto, D., Rocca, M. A., Wattjes, M. P., Yousry, T. A., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., & Barkhof, F. (2011). Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820a0cc4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.