Cited by 264Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma

Analysis of relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis

Gabilondo, I., Saiz, A., Galán, L., González, V., Jadraque, R., Sabater, L., Sans, A., Sempere, A. +5 more·2011·Neurology

Abstract

Objective The clinical characteristics of patients with relapsing anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis are not well-defined. In this study, we report the clinical profile and outcome of relapses in a series of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Methods We did a retrospective review of relapses that occurred in 25 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Relapses were defined as any new psychiatric or neurologic syndrome, not explained by other causes, which improved after immunotherapy or, less frequently, spontaneously. Results A total of 13 relapses were identified in 6 patients. Four of them had several, 2 to 4, relapses. There was a median delay of 2 years (range 0.5 to 13 years) for the first relapse. Median relapse rate was 0.52 relapses/patient-year. Relapse risk was higher in patients who did not receive immunotherapy in the first episode (p = 0.009). Most cases (53%) presented partial syndromes of the typical anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Main symptoms of relapses were speech dysfunction (61%), psychiatric (54%), consciousness-attention disturbance (38%), and seizures (31%). Three relapses (23%) presented with isolated atypical symptoms suggestive of brainstem-cerebellar involvement. An ovarian teratoma was detected at relapse in only 1 patient (17%). Relapses did not add residual deficit to that caused by the first episode. Conclusions Relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis are common (24%). They may occur many years after the initial episode. Relapses may present with partial aspec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e31822cfc6b

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabilondo, I., Saiz, A., Galán, L., González, V., Jadraque, R., Sabater, L., Sans, A., Sempere, A., Vela, A., Villalobos, F., Viñals, M., Villoslada, P., & Graus, F.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
77
Issue
10
Pages
996-999
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2117091873
Cited by
264
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Keywords
anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, relapse, immunotherapy, relapse risk, speech dysfunction, psychiatric symptoms, seizures, ovarian teratoma, autoimmune encephalitis, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autoantibodies, Child, Child, Preschool, Encephalitis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunotherapy, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Young Adult, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review