Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Background Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined. Methods In this multi-institutional observational study (2007-2012), all patients with GluN1 antibodies were assessed at symptom onset and 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Treatment included first-line immunotherapy (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis), second-line immunotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide), and tumor removal. Predictors of outcome were determined at the Universities of Pennsylvania and Barcelona using generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution. Results 577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied, 212 were children (<18 years). Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%). Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy resulting in better outcome than those who did not (OR 2·69, CI 1·24-5·80, p=0·012). During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months), and 30 died. At 24 month follow-up 204/252 (81%) had good outcome. Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months after symptom onset. Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50-0·76, p<0·0001) and lack of ICU admission (OR 0.12, CI 0·06-0·22,p<0·0001). 45 patients had one or multiple relapses (representing a 12% risk within 2 years); 46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001). In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort. Conclusions Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis respond to immunotherapy. Second-line immunotherapy is usually effective when first-line therapies fail. Recovery can take more than 18 months.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In this multi-institutional observational cohort of 577 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, immunotherapy and tumor removal produced good outcome (mRS 0–2) in 394/501 within 24 months, and second-line immunotherapy improved outcomes after first-line failure. Early treatment and no ICU admission predicted good outcome.
Key findings
- 577 patients (1–85 years, median 21) were studied; 211 (37%) were younger than 18 in the Results (the abstract states 212 children). Of 501 assessable patients, 472 (94%) received first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, and 251 (53%) improved within four weeks.
- Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy, which was associated with better outcome than no second-line therapy (OR 2·69, CI 1·24–5·80, p=0·012).
- During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached mRS 0–2 (median 6 months); at 24-month follow-up 203/252 (81%) had good outcome, and 24 (9·5%) died in the Results (the abstract reports 30 died). Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50–0·76, p<0·0001) and lack of ICU admission (OR 0·12, CI 0·06–0·22, p<0·0001).
- 45 patients had relapses, representing a 12% risk within 2 years; 46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001). In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of second-line immunotherapy effect were comparable to the entire cohort (OR 3·35, CI 0·86–12·98, p=0·081).
Methods
- Multi-institutional observational study (2007–2012) of patients with GluN1 antibodies from the Universities of Pennsylvania and Barcelona and samples from 200 centers worldwide (32 countries); 577 patients were included for demographic analyses, and 501 had follow-up of at least 4 months (median 24 months, range 4–186).
- Patients were assessed at symptom onset and 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS); symptoms were categorized into 8 groups. First-line immunotherapy was steroids, IVIg, or plasma exchange; second-line was rituximab or cyclophosphamide; tumor removal was also assessed. Treatment failure was no sustained improvement within four weeks and mRS ≥4.
- Statistical analysis used Fisher exact, Fisher-Freeman-Halton, or Mann-Whitney U tests; univariable binary logistic regression followed by generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution, subject as random effect, and time point from disease onset included; SAS GLIMMIX version 9.3.
Limitations
- The paper states the study was not randomized, was observational, and selection bias cannot be ruled out; individual treatments (e.g., plasma exchange vs IVIg or rituximab) could not be compared side-by-side statistically.
- The paper states there was no predefined protocol establishing order or combination of treatments, and treatment decisions were made by treating physicians based on clinical symptoms, family acceptance of side effects, and drug availability.
- The paper states that ending follow-up at 24 months likely underestimates recovery and overestimates mortality; imputation analysis estimated 7% mortality at 24 months. The text also shows inconsistent counts between abstract and Results for deaths, children, and 24-month good outcome, which is evident from the paper.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
17 of 23 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
The lower frequency of neurological relapses (12% versus 20-24% reported in previous studies) is likely due to better recognition of the disorder, earlier treatment, and increasing use of second-line immunotherapy.
“The lower frequency of neurological relapses (12% versus 20-24% reported in previous studies)11, 18 is likely due to better recognition of the disorder, earlier treatment, and increasing use of second-line immunotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
472 (94%) of 501 assessable patients underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal.
“Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0.0001).
“46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Early treatment was a predictor of good outcome (OR 0.62, CI 0.50-0.76, p<0.0001).
“Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50-0·76, p<0·0001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lack of ICU admission was a predictor of good outcome (OR 0.12, CI 0.06-0.22, p<0.0001).
“lack of ICU admission (OR 0.12, CI 0·06-0·22,p<0·0001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy.
“Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy resulting in better outcome than those who did not (OR 2·69, CI 1·24-5·80, p=0·012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
30 patients died during the first 24 months.
“During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months), and 30 died.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At 24 month follow-up 204/252 (81%) had good outcome.
“At 24 month follow-up 204/252 (81%) had good outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
First-line immunotherapy or tumor removal resulted in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%) of 472 patients.
“Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
212 patients were children younger than 18 years.
“577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied, 212 were children (<18 years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Second-line immunotherapy resulted in better outcome than no second-line immunotherapy in patients who failed first-line therapy (OR 2.69, CI 1.24-5.80, p=0.012).
“Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy resulting in better outcome than those who did not (OR 2·69, CI 1·24-5·80, p=0·012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months after symptom onset.
“Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months after symptom onset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied.
“577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied, 212 were children (<18 years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the first four weeks of the disease most patients developed a similar spectrum of symptoms regardless of age.
“Within the first four weeks of the disease most patients developed a similar spectrum of symptoms regardless of age.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the group of children, multivariable analysis identified similar risk factors as those of adults.
“Within the group of children, multivariable analysis identified similar risk factors as those of adults (Table S7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In adolescents, the disease presented with a combination of symptoms from the behavioral and seizure/movement disorder groups.
“In adolescents, the disease presented with a combination of symptoms from these groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Asian and African-American patients were more likely to have a teratoma (81 and 38 patients: 45% and 48%) than Caucasian (58: 31%) or Hispanics (23: 27%, p=0.007).
“Asian and African-American patients were more likely to have a teratoma (81 and 38 patients: 45% and 48%) than Caucasian (58: 31%) or Hispanics (23: 27%, p=0·007, Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Detection of NMDAR antibodies was compared in 250 paired serum and CSF samples, showing more sensitivity in CSF than serum (100% vs 85%, p<0.0001).
“Detection of NMDAR antibodies was compared in 250 paired serum and CSF samples randomly selected by use of an online random integer generator (http://www.random.org/integers/), showing more sensitivity in CSF than serum (100% vs 85%, p<0·0001, Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 12 patients with teratoma identified at symptom presentation or thereafter had neurological relapses.
“Only 12 patients with teratoma identified at symptom presentation or thereafter had neurological relapses (Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A relapse-decreasing effect of second-line immunotherapy was observed in patients without tumor (p=0.007).
“A relapse-decreasing effect of second-line immunotherapy was observed in patients without tumor (Figure S2B, p=0·007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Patients who received second-line immunotherapy during the initial episode of encephalitis had fewer relapses.
“Indeed, patients who received second-line immunotherapy during the initial episode of encephalitis had fewer relapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Twenty-nine patients were not treated with immunotherapy or surgery.
“Twenty-nine patients were not treated with immunotherapy or surgery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The introduction of second-line immunotherapy during relapses decreased the frequency of subsequent relapses (p=0.024).
“Similarly, the introduction of second-line immunotherapy during relapses decreased the frequency of subsequent relapses (Figure S3, p=0·024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with adults, the time between symptom onset and initiation of treatment was shorter in children (21 versus 28 days, p=0.007).
“Compared with adults, the time between symptom onset and initiation of treatment was shorter in children (21 versus 28 days, p=0·007, Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patients without a tumor had a higher frequency of relapses than those with a tumor (p=0.0007).
“Patients without a tumor had a higher frequency of relapses than those with a tumor (Figure 4A; p=0·0007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The combination of first-line immunotherapy more frequently used was steroids and IVIG (202 patients, 44%).
“The combination of first-line immunotherapy more frequently used was steroids and IVIG (202 patients, 44%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall the outcome was similar to that of adults (p=0.92).
“Overall the outcome was similar to that of adults (p=0·92, Table 3A and Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A longer follow-up was associated with a better outcome (p<0.0001).
“A longer follow-up was associated with a better outcome (p<0·0001, Table 3A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The suggested better outcome of patients with teratoma compared with those without teratoma was not confirmed in this study.
“The suggested better outcome of patients with teratoma compared with those without teratoma was not confirmed in this study; however, “ICU stay” and “time from symptom onset until initiation of treatment” were identified as significant prognostic factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The higher frequency of teratomas in Asian patients is a novel finding.
“The higher frequency of teratomas in Asian patients is also a novel finding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Atypical symptoms such as cerebellar ataxia or hemiparesis predominated in children.
“Atypical symptoms such as cerebellar ataxia or hemiparesis predominated in children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The use of immunotherapy in the initial episode of encephalitis was associated with a lower frequency of relapses (p=0.038).
“The use of immunotherapy in the initial episode of encephalitis associated with a lower frequency of relapses (Figure 4B, p=0·038).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The frequency of an underlying teratoma was significantly greater in females aged 12 years or older than in young children and males (52% versus 6%).
“In the current study, the frequency of an underlying teratoma was significantly greater in females aged 12 years or older than in young children and males (52% versus 6%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the untreated group, 29% had a poor outcome (mRS 3-5 or dead).
“Overall, in this group, 29% had a poor outcome (mRS 3-5 or dead).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
These patients who did not improve with first-line therapy continued with poor mRS scores (median 5).
“These patients continued with poor mRS scores (median 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Recovery can take more than 18 months.
“Recovery can take more than 18 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Second-line immunotherapy is usually effective when first-line therapies fail.
“Second-line immunotherapy is usually effective when first-line therapies fail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis respond to immunotherapy.
“Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis respond to immunotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
In this study, the effect of individual treatments could not be compared side-by-side statistically.
“In this study, the effect of individual treatments (e.g., plasma exchange vs IVIg or rituximab) could not be compared side-by-side statistically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The large number of events and prospective follow-up provide level II-2 evidence of the usefulness of immunotherapy and tumor removal in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.
“Moreover, the large number of events (patients achieving a good outcome) and prospective follow-up of many cases reported here, provide level II-2 evidence (US Preventive Services Task Force)24 of the usefulness of immunotherapy and tumor removal in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The manuscript establishes that the clinical presentation in children is often different from that of the adults.
“The manuscript establishes that the clinical presentation in children is often different from that of the adults; this has been previously suggested in small series but not confirmed until now.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 44
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExperiments where patients' antibodies were added to cultures of hippocampal neurons or infused into the hippocampus of rodents showed specific antibody-mediated internalization of NMDAR and alteration of the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.
“Experiments where patients’ antibodies were added to cultures of hippocampal neurons or infused into the hippocampus of rodents showed specific antibody-mediated internalization of NMDAR and alteration of the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.9, 10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Hughes, 2010, Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, J Neurosci source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] Mikasova, 2012, Disrupted surface cross-talk between NMDA and Ephrin-B2 receptors in anti-NMDA encephalitis, Brain source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe disorder has been recognized in patients of all ages, but more frequently in young adults and children with or without teratoma.
“The disorder, named “anti-NMDAR encephalitis”, has since been recognized in patients of all ages, but more frequently in young adults and children with or without teratoma.3, 4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatients usually present with acute behavioral change, psychosis and catatonia that evolve to include seizures, memory deficit, dyskinesias, speech problems, and autonomic and breathing dysregulation.
“Patients usually present with acute behavioral change, psychosis and catatonia that evolve to include seizures, memory deficit, dyskinesias, speech problems, and autonomic and breathing dysregulation.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source
The Results (page not supplied) report that most patients presented with psychiatric symptoms and later developed seizures, dyskinesias, autonomic instability, and hypoventilation; some also had speech disturbances. The claimed sequence is not fully supported: the paper describes a catatonic-like state developing after decreased consciousness, while some patients had memory loss at presentation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a center focused on the study of encephalitis of unclear etiology, the frequency of anti-NMDAR encephalitis surpassed that of any specific viral etiologies in young individuals.
“In a center focused in the study of encephalitis of unclear etiology the frequency of anti-NMDAR encephalitis surpassed that of any specific viral etiologies in young individuals.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Gable, 2012, The Frequency of autoimmune N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project, Clin Infect Dis source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDespite the severity of the disease, patients often improve after intensive care support, immunotherapy, and prolonged hospitalizations that require multidisciplinary care.
“Despite the severity of the disease, patients often improve after intensive care support, immunotherapy, and prolonged hospitalizations that require multidisciplinary care.3, 11”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source
- cites [11] Irani, 2010, N-methyl-D-aspartate antibody encephalitis: temporal progression of clinical and paraclinical observations in a predominantly non-paraneoplastic disorder of both sexes, Brain source
The Results (Clinical outcomes and serial estimations of antibodies; page unavailable) document severe disability, an average hospital stay of 160 days, immunotherapy, and improvement associated with earlier treatment. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes prolonged ventilation and intensive-care admissions. The paper does not establish that multidisciplinary care was required or that intensive-care support itself led to improvement. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEpidemiological studies suggest that anti-NMDAR encephalitis is the most common cause of autoimmune encephalitis after acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM).
“Epidemiological studies suggest that this disorder is the most common cause of autoimmune encephalitis after acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM).5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Granerod, 2010, Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study, Lancet Infect Dis source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says that about a fifth of patients had immune-mediated encephalitis, mostly ADEM, and reports 16 antibody-associated cases. The Results (page unavailable) identify NMDA receptor antibodies among the causes, but the passages do not establish that anti-NMDAR encephalitis was more common than the other antibody-associated cause after ADEM. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationFollow-up information was obtained at regular intervals (4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months) after symptom onset; neurological status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS).
“Follow-up information was obtained at regular intervals (4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months) after symptom onset; neurological status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS).12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] van Swieten, 1988, Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients, Stroke source
The Subjects and Methods section says the researchers used the modified Rankin scale to assess handicap in stroke patients. It does not report follow-up at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months; its patients were assessed within the first week or within five months after stroke. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies suggest that the syndrome and response to treatment may differ between children and adults.
“Moreover, studies suggest that the syndrome and response to treatment may differ between children and adults.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Florance, 2009, Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents, Ann Neurol source
The Discussion describes differences between children and adults in symptom frequency and presentation, supporting the syndrome portion. It reports mixed responses to immunotherapy in children and suggests this could relate to their lower rate of tumors, but it does not establish a difference in treatment response between children and adults. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIf a tumor is found, removal is important because it expedites improvement and decreases relapses.
“If a tumor is found, removal is important because it expedites improvement and decreases relapses.3, 17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source
The Results report fewer relapses after early tumour treatment (1 of 36 versus 14 of 64) and better outcomes when tumours were removed within four months. Initial improvement occurred sooner in the early-treatment group (median 8 versus 11 weeks), but that difference was not statistically significant (p=0.10). The claim overstates the evidence by saying removal itself expedites improvement and decreases relapses; early treatment usually also included immunotherapy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Sabin, 2008, Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 26-2008. A 26-year-old woman with headache and behavioral changes, N Engl J Med source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationSamples were considered positive if they fulfilled previously reported criteria including a characteristic pattern of immunostaining of the neuropil of rat brain and specific reactivity with HEK293 cells expressing GluN1 subunits of the NMDAR.
“Samples were considered positive if they fulfilled previously reported criteria3 including (1) a characteristic pattern of immunostaining of the neuropil of rat brain, and (2) specific reactivity with HEK293 cells expressing GluN1 (also known as NR1) subunits of the NMDAR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source
The Methods (Patients and procedures; page unavailable) say samples were considered positive when three immunohistochemical criteria were met, and describe testing sera and CSF against NR1-expressing HEK293 cells. Our copy does not specify that rat-brain neuropil immunostaining was one of those positivity criteria, so that part of the attributed description remains unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe discovery of anti-NMDAR encephalitis has changed the diagnostic and treatment approach to several neurologic and psychiatric disorders, and has led to the identification of an expanding group of autoimmune encephalitis related to antibodies against synaptic proteins.
“The discovery of anti-NMDAR encephalitis has changed the diagnostic and treatment approach to several neurologic and psychiatric disorders, and has led to the identification of an expanding group of autoimmune encephalitis related to antibodies against synaptic proteins.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Lancaster, 2012, Neuronal autoantigens—pathogenesis, associated disorders and antibody testing, Nat Rev Neurol source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRapidly progressive alterations of memory, behavior, cognition, and psychosis previously thought to be idiopathic or viral-induced are now known to be autoimmune.
“Rapidly progressive alterations of memory, behavior, cognition, and psychosis previously thought to be idiopathic or viral-induced are now known to be autoimmune.20-23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [20] Chapman, 2011, Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: diagnosis, psychiatric presentation, and treatment, Am J Psychiatry source
- cites [21] Kayser, 2011, The emerging link between autoimmune disorders and neuropsychiatric disease, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci source
The “Autoimmune Synaptic Encephalitis” section says limbic encephalitides once thought viral or paraneoplastic commonly have an autoimmune cause and can develop over days to weeks with memory and psychiatric symptoms. The claim overgeneralizes this finding: the paper does not say that rapidly progressive changes of these kinds are all now known to be autoimmune, and it describes some cases as idiopathic autoimmune processes rather than formerly thought idiopathic. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Pruss, 2012, IgA NMDA receptor antibodies are markers of synaptic immunity in slow cognitive impairment, Neurology source
The Discussion says synaptic autoimmunity can cause acute, severe changes in memory, behavior, and cognition, and the Index patient section describes delusions and hallucinations. But this paper primarily studies slowly progressive impairment; the Clinical course section says none of its seven patients had acute symptoms resembling classic anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Our copy does not establish that these conditions were previously thought to be viral-induced. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Pruss, 2012, NMDA receptor antibodies in herpes simplex encephalitis, Ann Neurol source
The Abstract’s Interpretation and the Discussion report NMDAR autoantibodies in some patients with herpes simplex encephalitis and suggest that autoimmunity may contribute to their symptoms. They do not establish that the listed memory, behavioral, cognitive, and psychotic symptoms—previously considered idiopathic or viral-induced—are now known to be autoimmune; the Discussion says clinical differences between antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients were not established. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown data45 patients had one or multiple relapses, representing a 12% risk within 2 years.
“45 patients had one or multiple relapses (representing a 12% risk within 2 years)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTreatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 patients with median follow-up 24 months.
“Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort.
“In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months).
“During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months), and 30 died.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 501 patients with at least 4 months follow-up, 461 (92%) were treated with first-line immunotherapy, 134 (27%) with second-line immunotherapy, 10 (2%) with tumor removal without immunotherapy, and 29 (6%) were not treated.
“Among the 501 patients with at least 4 months follow-up, 461 (92%) were treated with first-line immunotherapy, 134 (27%) with second-line immunotherapy (Figure 2 and Table 2), 10 (2%) with tumor removal without immunotherapy, and 29 (6%) were not treated (see below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the first month of the disease, 498 of 571 (87%) patients developed four or more of the 8 categories of symptoms; only 6 (1%) remained mono-symptomatic.
“During the first month of the disease, 498 of 571 (87%) patients developed four or more of the 8 categories of symptoms; only 6 (1%) remained mono-symptomatic (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf 197 patients with teratoma, 189 (96%) had tumor resection, 20 (11%) of them at neurological relapse or after recovery.
“Of 197 patients with teratoma, 189 (96%) had tumor resection, 20 (11%) of them at neurological relapse or after recovery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMRI of the brain, EEG and CSF studies were abnormal in 180/540 (33%), 432/482 (90%) and 418/532 (79%) patients, respectively.
“MRI of the brain, EEG and CSF studies were abnormal in 180/540 (33%), 432/482 (90%) and 418/532 (79%) patients, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe presence of a tumor predominated in patients between 12 and 45 years; only 4 females younger than 12 years (6%) and 7 males (6%, all adults) had a tumor (p<0.0005).
“The presence of a tumor predominated in patients between 12 and 45 years; only 4 females younger than 12 years (6%), and 7 males (6%, all adults) had a tumor (p<0·0005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong patients who received second-line immunotherapy, 84/125 reached an mRS 0-2 during the first 24 months, while among those who did not receive second-line immunotherapy 49/96 reached an mRS 0-2 (median 10 and 15 months, respectively).
“Among patients who received second line immunotherapy, 84/125 reached an mRS 0-2 during the first 24 months, while among those who did not receive second line immunotherapy 49/96 reached an mRS 0-2 (median 10 and 15 months, respectively); at 24 month follow-up 43/55 (78%) and 32/58 (55%) had a good outcome (Figure 3C and 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTen studies and one extended review describing at least three patients were identified; five of them included at least twenty-five patients.
“Ten studies and one extended review describing at least three patients were identified; five of them included at least twenty-five patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEighty-two of 177 (46%) children failed first-line immunotherapy; in these patients, the magnitude of the effects of second-line immunotherapy (used in 53 cases, 65%) was comparable to that of the entire cohort although due to the smaller sample size it did not reach significance (OR 3.35, CI 0.86-12.98, p=0.081).
“Eighty-two of 177 (46%) children failed first-line immunotherapy; in these patients, the magnitude of the effects of second-line immunotherapy (used in 53 cases, 65%; Table S5) was comparable to that of the entire cohort although due to the smaller sample size it did not reach significance (Table S6B, OR 3·35, CI 0·86-12·98, p=0·081).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the 24 month follow-up, 45 patients (representing a 12% risk) had clinical relapses, which in 15 patients (33%) were multiple.
“During the 24 month follow-up, 45 patients (representing a 12% risk) had clinical relapses, which in 15 patients (33%) were multiple (Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study confirms the female preponderance, the high frequency of the disease in children, and a higher risk for an underlying teratoma in African-Americans.
“It confirms the female preponderance, the high frequency of the disease in children, and a higher risk for an underlying teratoma in African-Americans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataICU stay and time from symptom onset until initiation of treatment were identified as significant prognostic factors.
“however, “ICU stay” and “time from symptom onset until initiation of treatment” were identified as significant prognostic factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data207 tumors (94%) were ovarian teratomas, 4 (2%) extraovarian teratomas, and 9 (4%) other tumors.
“Two hundred and seven tumors (94%) were ovarian teratomas, 4 (2%) extraovarian teratomas, and 9 (4%) other tumors (two of each, lung, breast, testicular; one ovarian carcinoma, one thymic carcinomas, and one pancreatic cancer).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data211 (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years.
“Two hundred and eleven (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years, and 28 (5%) were 45 or older.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the first 24 months, 241/251 patients who improved with first-line therapy reached an mRS 0-2 (median 3 months); at 24 month follow-up 111/115 (97%) had a good outcome.
“During the first 24 months 241/251 reached an mRS 0-2 (median 3 months); at 24 month follow-up 111/115 (97%) of these patients had a good outcome (Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 16 relapses (23%) the severity of symptoms was comparable to that of the initial episode, and in 7 (10%) was worse.
“In 16 relapses (23%) the severity of symptoms was comparable to that of the initial episode, and in 7 (10%) was worse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data495/571 patients (87%) had a maximum mRS of 5, and 435 (77%) were admitted to the ICU.
“The assessment of disease severity showed that 495/571 patients (87%) had a maximum mRS of 5, and 435 (77%) were admitted to the ICU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared with the initial episode, 46/69 (67%) relapses were less severe, more frequently mono-symptomatic (24, 35%), and resulted in fewer admissions (12, 17%) to the ICU (all p<0.0001).
“Compared with the initial episode, 46/69 (67%) relapses were less severe (as reflected by a lower mRS score measured at the stage of maximum severity), more frequently mono-symptomatic (24, 35%), and resulted in fewer admissions (12, 17%) to the ICU (all p<0·0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data28 (5%) of all 577 patients were 45 or older.
“Two hundred and eleven (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years, and 28 (5%) were 45 or older.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data468 patients were female (81%).
“Four hundred and sixty-eight patients were female (81%; Figure 1A and Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMovement disorders were more frequent in children, while memory deficits and central hypoventilation occurred more often in adults.
“While movement disorders were more frequent in children, memory deficits and central hypoventilation occurred more often in adults (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the current study, the frequency of relapses was somewhat less frequent than in previous reports; in addition, the milder nature of the symptoms compared with the initial episodes was noted in most relapses.
“In the current study, the frequency of relapses was somewhat less frequent than in previous reports; in addition, the milder nature of the symptoms compared with the initial episodes was noted in most relapses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFirst-line immunotherapy was often insufficient to control the disease; in this group, the addition of second-line immunotherapy proved to associate significantly with a better outcome compared with those who did not receive second-line immunotherapy.
“First-line immunotherapy was often insufficient to control the disease; in this group of patients the addition of second-line immunotherapy proved to associate significantly with a better outcome compared with those who did not receive second-line immunotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 24 month follow-up 43/55 (78%) of those who received second-line immunotherapy and 32/58 (55%) of those who did not had a good outcome.
“at 24 month follow-up 43/55 (78%) and 32/58 (55%) had a good outcome (Figure 3C and 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSecond-line immunotherapy was well tolerated; only 4 patients had serious adverse effects, all reversible.
“Second-line immunotherapy was well tolerated; only 4 patients had serious adverse effects, all reversible (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data220 (38%) patients had an underlying neoplasm; of these, 213 were women (representing 46% of all women).
“Two hundred and twenty (38%) patients had an underlying neoplasm; of these, 213 were women (representing 46% of all women).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn univariable analysis, factors associated with good outcome included no need for ICU (p<0.0001), early treatment (p=0.009), and low severity of disease within four weeks of onset (maximum mRS, p=0.011).
“In univariable analysis, the factors associated with good outcome included, no need for ICU (p<0·0001), early treatment (p=0·009), and low severity of disease within four weeks of onset (maximum mRS, p=0·011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSix of the nine patients with tumors other than teratomas were older than 45 years.
“Six of the nine patients with tumors other than teratomas were older than 45 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data238 adults (65%) presented with behavioral problems, while 55 children below 12 years (50%) presented with seizures or movement disorders.
“Two hundred and thirty-eight adults (65%) presented with behavioral problems, while 55 children below 12 years (50%) presented with seizures or movement disorders (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe frequency of males was higher in age groups below 12 years (43: 39%) and above 45 (12: 43%, p<0.0001).
“The frequency of males was higher in age groups below 12 years (43: 39%) and above 45 (12: 43%, p<0·0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenAnti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder.
“Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationFactors associated with a good outcome (p<0.1) were included in generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution, declaring the subject as random and the other factors as fixed effects.
“Factors associated with a good outcome (p<0·1) were included in generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution, declaring the subject as random and the other factors as fixed effects.13”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Verbeke, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAfter failing first-line immunotherapy, all these patients remained in a similar poor neurological status, enabling the comparison between those who subsequently received second-line immunotherapy with those who did not.
“Indeed, after failing first-line immunotherapy, all these patients remained in a similar poor neurological status, enabling the comparison between those who subsequently received second-line immunotherapy with those who did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll mRS scores at defined time points were used, and the time point from onset of disease was included as an additional variable.
“All mRS scores at defined time points were used (4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months; e.g. each patient’s follow-up could provide a maximum of 5 scores). The “time point from onset of disease” was included as an additional variable, allowing us to analyze patients with different duration of follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study has the limitations of not being randomized but sets the base for future trials to determine the efficacy of each individual treatment and duration of immunotherapy.
“Our study has the limitations of not being randomized but sets the base for future trials to determine the efficacy of each individual treatment (e.g., steroids, IVIg, plasmapheresis, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide) and duration of immunotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAfter creation of the model, the effect of second-line immunotherapy was determined by adding second-line immunotherapy to the same model applied to only those patients who had failed first-line immunotherapy.
“After creation of this model, the effect of second-line immunotherapy was determined by adding second-line immunotherapy to the same model applied to only those patients who had failed first-line immunotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSymptom presentation varied between children and adults, but in most cases the progression of symptoms evolved towards a similar syndrome.
“Symptom presentation varied between children and adults (“more neurological in children”, “more psychiatric in adults”), but in most cases the progression of symptoms evolved towards a similar syndrome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy establishing the last follow-up assessment at 24 months, the study likely underestimates the frequency and level of recovery because some patients had a shorter follow-up, others continued to improve after 24 months, and those with substantial improvement tended to discontinue follow-ups.
“By establishing the last follow-up assessment at 24 months, our study likely underestimates the frequency and level of recovery because some patients had a shorter follow-up, others continued to improve after 24 months, and those with substantial improvement tended to discontinue follow-ups (Figure S5A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis is the first study to provide extensive and structured follow-up and prognostic factors determining outcome.
“This is the first study to provide extensive and structured follow-up and prognostic factors determining outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor the same reasons, the frequency of mortality is likely overestimated; imputation analysis estimated 7% mortality at 24 months.
“For the same reasons, the frequency of mortality is likely overestimated; imputation analysis estimated 7% mortality at 24 months (Figure S5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAlthough selection bias cannot be ruled out in observational studies like this, the authors could not identify obvious bias between patients who after failing first-line therapies were treated with second-line therapy and those who did not: severity of symptoms and duration of ICU stay was similar (92% vs 88%, and 88% vs 87%, respectively), and there were no differences in age, gender, ethnicity,和
“Although selection bias cannot be ruled out in observational studies like this, we could not identify obvious bias between patients who after failing first-line therapies were treated with second-line therapy and those who did not: the severity of symptoms and duration of ICU stay was similar (92% vs 88%, and 88% vs 87%, respectively), and there were no differences in age, gender, ethnicity, and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataOur study extends epidemiological and clinical knowledge on anti-NMDAR encephalitis.
“Our study extends epidemiological and clinical knowledge on anti-NMDAR encephalitis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll patients tested positive for NMDAR antibodies were included without selection criteria other than availability of clinical information.
“All patients tested positive for NMDAR antibodies were included in the study without selection criteria other than availability of clinical information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataFactors influencing outcome were assessed by univariable binary logistic regression independently of the treatments given.
“Factors influencing outcome were assessed by univariable binary logistic regression (good outcome defined as mRS 0-2) independently of the treatments given.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenPatients with a follow-up shorter than 4 months were excluded from analysis of effects of treatment and outcome.
“Patients with a follow-up shorter than 4 months were excluded from analysis of effects of treatment and outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSecond-line immunotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide or both significantly improved the outcome of those who did not respond to first-line therapy, and decreased the frequency of relapses.
“Moreover, second-line immunotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide or both significantly improved the outcome of those who did not respond to first-line therapy, and decreased the frequency of relapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis large observational study demonstrates that immunotherapy and tumor removal if applicable result in substantial neurological improvement in 81% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis after a median follow-up of 24 months.
“This large, observational study demonstrates that immunotherapy and tumor removal if applicable, result in substantial neurological improvement in 81% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis after a median follow-up of 24 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome in anti-NMDAR encephalitis have not been defined.
“Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The efficacy of immunotherapy and its impact in the long-term outcome have not been established.
“However, the efficacy of immunotherapy and its impact in the long-term outcome have not been established.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A substantial number of patients fail to respond to first-line immunotherapy, and for these patients the treatment strategy and outcome are unknown.
“A substantial number of patients fail to respond to first-line immunotherapy, such as steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and for these patients the treatment strategy and outcome are unknown.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A systematic analysis of the effects of sequential immunotherapy and their impact on long-term outcome has not been previously done in any of these disorders or other antibody-mediated neurological diseases.
“To our knowledge, a systematic analysis of the effects of sequential (first-, second-line) immunotherapy and their impact on long-term outcome has not been previously done in any of these disorders or other antibody-mediated neurological diseases.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting number of children in the cohort
MinorThe abstract reports 212 patients younger than 18, while the demographics section reports 211 among the same 577 patients.
“577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied, 212 were children (<18 years).”
“Two hundred and eleven (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years”
Conflicting good-outcome counts at 24 months
MinorThe abstract reports 204 of 252 patients with a good outcome at 24 months, but the results section reports 203 of 252. Both figures are printed as 81%.
“At 24 month follow-up 204/252 (81%) had good outcome.”
“At 24 month follow-up 203/252 (81%) had a favorable outcome”
Cites
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512 · see citing works
Rochester, C. L., & Kradin, R. L. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200012213432509 · Cited by 3,875 · see citing works
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci
Yudofsky, S. C., & Hales, R. E. (1992) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.4.4.359 · Cited by 3,818 · see citing works
Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies
Dalmau, J., Gleichman, A. J., Hughes, E. G., Rossi, J. E., Peng, X., Lai, M., Dessain, S. K., Rosenfeld, M. R., Balice-Gordon, R., & Lynch, D. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70224-2 · Cited by 3,488 · see citing works
Self-citationKrystal, J. H. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004 · Cited by 3,330 · see citing works
Dalmau, J., Tüzün, E., Wu, H., Masjuan, J., Rossi, J. E., Voloschin, A., Baehring, J. M., Shimazaki, H., Koide, R., King, D., et al. (2007) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21050 · Cited by 2,492 · see citing works
Self-citationGranerod, J., Ambrose, H. E., Davies, N. W., Clewley, J. P., Walsh, A. L., Morgan, D., Cunningham, R., Zuckerman, M., Mutton, K. J., Solomon, T., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70222-x · Cited by 1,358 · see citing works
Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis
Hughes, E. G., Peng, X., Gleichman, A. J., Lai, M., Zhou, L., Tsou, R., Parsons, T. D., Lynch, D. R., Dalmau, J., & Balice-Gordon, R. J. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0167-10.2010 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Self-citationModels for Discrete Longitudinal Data
Molenberghs, G., & Verbeke, G. N. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-28980-1 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents
Florance, N. R., Davis, R. L., Lam, C., Szperka, C., Zhou, L., Ahmad, S., Campen, C. J., Moss, H., Peter, N., Gleichman, A. J., et al. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21756 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Self-citationMice with Reduced NMDA Receptor Expression Display Behaviors Related to Schizophrenia
Mohn, A. R., Gainetdinov, R. R., Caron, M. G., & Koller, B. H. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81972-8 · Cited by 1,075 · see citing works
Irani, S. R., Bera, K., Waters, P., Zuliani, L., Maxwell, S., Zandi, M. S., Friese, M. A., Galea, I., Kullmann, D. M., Beeson, D., et al. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq113 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Gable, M. S., Sheriff, H., Dalmau, J., Tilley, D. H., & Glaser, C. A. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir1038 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Self-citationParaneoplastic encephalitis, psychiatric symptoms, and hypoventilation in ovarian teratoma
Vitaliani, R., Mason, W. P., Ances, B. M., Zwerdling, T., Jiang, Z., & Dalmau, J. O. (2005) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20614 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Self-citationScreening for tumours in paraneoplastic syndromes: report of an EFNS Task Force
Titulaer, M. J., Soffietti, R., Dalmau, J. O., Ne, G., Giometto, B., Graus, F., Grisold, W., Honnorat, J., Smitt, P. A. E. S., Tănăsescu, R., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03220.x · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuronal autoantigens—pathogenesis, associated disorders and antibody testing
Lancaster, E., & Dalmau, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.99 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Self-citationGuide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the U S Preventive Services Task Force
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 446 · see citing works
N‐methyl‐ <scp>D</scp> ‐aspartate receptor antibodies in herpes simplex encephalitis
Prüss, H., Finke, C., Höltje, M., Hofmann, J., Klingbeil, C., Probst, C., Borowski, K., Ahnert‐Hilger, G., Harms, L., Schwab, J. M., et al. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23689 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Self-citationTüzün, E., Zhou, L., Baehring, J. M., Bannykh, S., Rosenfeld, M. R., & Dalmau, J. O. (2009) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0582-4 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Self-citationDisrupted surface cross-talk between NMDA and Ephrin-B2 receptors in anti-NMDA encephalitis
Mikasova, L., De Rossi, P., Bouchet, D., Georges, F., Rogemond, V., Didelot, A., Meissirel, C., Honnorat, J., & Groc, L. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws092 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Analysis of relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis
Gabilondo, I., Saiz, A., Galán, L., González, V., Jadraque, R., Sabater, L., Sans, A., Sempere, A., Vela, A., Villalobos, F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31822cfc6b · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationGuide to clinical preventive services. Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Tw, A. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: diagnosis, psychiatric presentation, and treatment
Chapman, M. R., & Vause, H. E. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020181 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data
Williamson, J. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2006.s117 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
IgA NMDA receptor antibodies are markers of synaptic immunity in slow cognitive impairment
Prüss, H., Höltje, M., Maier, N., Gomez, A., Buchert, R., Harms, L., Ahnert-Hilger, G., Schmitz, D., Terborg, C., Kopp, U., et al. (2012) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318258300d · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Emerging Link Between Autoimmune Disorders and Neuropsychiatric Disease
Kayser, M. S., & Dalmau, J. (2011) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.23.1.90 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationOvarian Teratoma Associated With Anti-N-Methyl D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis
Dabner, M., McCluggage, W. G., Bundell, C., Carr, A. S., Leung, Y. C., Sharma, R. N., & Stewart, C. J. R. (2012) · International Journal of Gynecological Pathology · doi:10.1097/pgp.0b013e31824a1de2 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Case 26-2008: A 26-Year-Old Woman with Headache and Behavioral Changes
Sabin, T. D., Jednacz, J. A., & Staats, P. N. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcpc0804644 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis
Graus, F., Titulaer, M. J., Balu, R., Benseler, S. M., Bien, C. G., Cellucci, T., Cortese, I. C. M., Dale, R. C., Gelfand, J. M., Geschwind, M. D., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00401-9 · Cited by 4,580 · see citing works
Self-citationPadmanabhan, A., Connelly‐Smith, L. S., Aqui, N. A., Balogun, R. A., Klingel, R., Meyer, E., Pham, H. P., Schneiderman, J., Witt, V., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.21705 · Cited by 2,245 · see citing works
Thijs, R. D., Surges, R., O'Brien, T. J., & Sander, J. W. A. S. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32596-0 · Cited by 2,203 · see citing works
Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis
Dalmau, J. O., & Graus, F. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1708712 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Self-citationGresa‐Arribas, N., Titulaer, M. J., Torrents, A., Aguilar, E., McCracken, L., Leypoldt, F., Gleichman, A. J., Balice‐Gordon, R. J., Rosenfeld, M. R., Lynch, D. R., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70282-5 · Cited by 1,306 · see citing works
Self-citationVenkatesan, A., Tunkel, A. R., Bloch, K. C., Lauring, A. S., Sejvar, J. J., Bitnun, A., Stahl, J. ‐., Mailles, A., DREBOT, M. A., Rupprecht, C. E., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit458 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
Self-citationInflammation and immunity in schizophrenia: implications for pathophysiology and treatment
Khandaker, G. M., Cousins, L., Deakin, J., Lennox, B. R., Yolken, R., & Jones, P. B. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00122-9 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Dalmau, J. O., Armangué, T., Planagumà, J., Radosevic, M., Mannara, F., Leypoldt, F., Geis, C., Lancaster, E., Titulaer, M. J., Rosenfeld, M. R., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30244-3 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwartz, J. E., Padmanabhan, A., Aqui, N. A., Balogun, R. A., Connelly‐Smith, L. S., Delaney, M., Dunbar, N. M., Witt, V., Wu, Y., & Shaz, B. H. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.21470 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Autoimmune encephalitis epidemiology and a comparison to infectious encephalitis
Dubey, D., Pittock, S. J., Kelly, C. R., McKeon, A. B., Lopez-Chiriboga, A. S., Lennon, V. A., Gadoth, A., Smith, C. Y., Bryant, S. C., Klein, C. J., et al. (2018) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25131 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes
Graus, F., Vogrig, A., Muñiz‐Castrillo, S., Antoine, J.-C. G., Desestret, V., Dubey, D., Giometto, B., Irani, S. R., Joubert, B., Leypoldt, F., et al. (2021) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000001014 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroinflammation and psychiatric illness
Najjar, S., Pearlman, D. M., Alper, K., Najjar, A., & Devinsky, O. (2013) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-10-43 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Connelly‐Smith, L. S., Alquist, C. R., Aqui, N. A., Hofmann, J. C., Klingel, R., Onwuemene, O. A., Patriquin, C. J., Pham, H. P., Sanchez, A. P., Schneiderman, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22043 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Armangué, T., Spatola, M., Vlagea, A. D., Mattozzi, S., Carceles‐Cordon, M., Martínez‐Heras, E., Llufriú, S., Muchart, J., Erro, M. E., Abraira, L., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30244-8 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Sonderen, A., Thijs, R. D., Coenders, E. C., Jiskoot, L. C., Sánchez, E., de Bruijn, M. A. A. M., van Coevorden‐Hameete, M. H., Wirtz, P. W., Schreurs, M. W. J., Smitt, P. A. E. S., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003173 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Self-citationDalmau, J. O., Geis, C., & Graus, F. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00010.2016 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Self-citationPetit‐Pedrol, M., Armangué, T., Peng, X., Bataller, L., Cellucci, T., Davis, R. A., McCracken, L., Martínez‐Hernández, E., Mason, W. P., Kruer, M. C., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70299-0 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwartz, J. E., Winters, J. L., Padmanabhan, A., Balogun, R. A., Delaney, M., Linenberger, M. L., Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Williams, M. E., Wu, Y., & Shaz, B. H. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.21276 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Autoimmune encephalitis: proposed best practice recommendations for diagnosis and acute management
Abboud, H., Probasco, J. C., Irani, S. R., Ances, B. M., Benavides, D. R., Bradshaw, M., Christo, P. P., Dale, R. C., Fernández-Fournier, M., Flanagan, E. P., et al. (2021) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-325300 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Self-citationOverlapping demyelinating syndromes and anti–N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor encephalitis
Titulaer, M. J., Höftberger, R., Iizuka, T., Leypoldt, F., McCracken, L., Cellucci, T., Benson, L. A., Shu, H., Irioka, T., Hirano, M., et al. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24117 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice
Planagumà, J., Leypoldt, F., Mannara, F., Cuesta, J., Martín‐García, E., Aguilar, E., Titulaer, M. J., Petit‐Pedrol, M., Jain, A., Balice‐Gordon, R. J., et al. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu310 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Self-citationNew-onset refractory status epilepticus
Gaspard, N., Foreman, B. P., Alvarez, V., Kang, C. M. C., Probasco, J. C., Jongeling, A. C., Meyers, E. E., Espinera, A. R., Haas, K. F., Schmitt, S. E., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001940 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Encephalitis and GABA B receptor antibodies
Höftberger, R., Titulaer, M. J., Sabater, L., Döme, B., Rózsás, A., Hegedűs, B., Hoda, M. A., László, V., Ankersmit, H. J., Harms, L., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a9585f · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanisms of Autoantibody-Induced Pathology
Ludwig, R. J., Vanhoorelbeke, K., Leypoldt, F., Kaya, Z., Bieber, K., McLachlan, S. M., Komorowski, L., Luo, J., Cabral-Marques, O., Hammers, C. M., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00603 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Herpes simplex virus encephalitis is a trigger of brain autoimmunity
Armangué, T., Leypoldt, F., Málaga, I., Raspall‐Chaure, M., Martí, I., Nichter, C. A., Pugh, J., Vicente-Rasoamalala, M., Hidalgo, M. L., Macaya, A., et al. (2013) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24083 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Self-citationThe clinical spectrum of Caspr2 antibody–associated disease
van Sonderen, A., Ariño, H., Petit‐Pedrol, M., Leypoldt, F., Körtvélyessy, P., Wandinger, K., Lancaster, E., Wirtz, P. W., Schreurs, M. W. J., Smitt, P. A. E. S., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002917 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Self-citationMOG antibody–positive, benign, unilateral, cerebral cortical encephalitis with epilepsy
Ogawa, R., Nakashima, I., Takahashi, T., Kaneko, K., Akaishi, T., Takai, Y., Sato, D. K., Nishiyama, S., Misu, T., Kuroda, H., et al. (2017) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000322 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis
Lancaster, E. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.3988/jcn.2016.12.1.1 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Neuropsychiatric lupus: new mechanistic insights and future treatment directions
Schwartz, N., Stock, A. D., & Putterman, C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-018-0156-8 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Hacohen, Y., Wong, Y. Y. M., Lechner, C., Juryńczyk, M., Wright, S. K., Konuşkan, B., Kalser, J., Poulat, A., Maurey, H., Ganelin‐Cohen, E., et al. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4601 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Leypoldt, F., Armangué, T., & Dalmau, J. O. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12553 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Self-citationKayser, M. S., Titulaer, M. J., Gresa‐Arribas, N., & Dalmau, J. O. (2013) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3216 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Self-citationPollak, T. A., Lennox, B., Müller, S., Benros, M. E., Prüß, H., van Elst, L. T., Klein, H. C., Steiner, J. H., Frodl, T., Bogerts, B., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30290-1 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Encephalitis and AMPA receptor antibodies
Höftberger, R., van Sonderen, A., Leypoldt, F., Houghton, D. J., Geschwind, M. D., Gelfand, J. M., Paredes, M. F., Sabater, L., Saiz, A., Titulaer, M. J., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001682 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical approach to the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis in the pediatric patient
Cellucci, T., Mater, H. V., Graus, F., Muscal, E., Gallentine, W. B., Klein‐Gitelman, M. S., Benseler, S. M., Frankovich, J., Gorman, M., van Haren, K. P., et al. (2020) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000663 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-citationAcute mechanisms underlying antibody effects in anti–N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor encephalitis
Moscato, E. H., Peng, X., Jain, A., Parsons, T. D., Dalmau, J. O., & Balice‐Gordon, R. J. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24195 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Self-citationAnti-LGI1–associated cognitive impairment
Ariño, H., Armangué, T., Petit‐Pedrol, M., Sabater, L., Martínez‐Hernández, E., Hara, M., Lancaster, E., Saiz, A., Dalmau, J. O., & Graus, F. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003009 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Self-citationB cells in autoimmune and neurodegenerative central nervous system diseases
Sabatino, J. J., Pröbstel, A., & Zamvil, S. S. (2019) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0233-2 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Utility and safety of rituximab in pediatric autoimmune and inflammatory CNS disease
Dale, R. C., Brilot, F., Duffy, L. V., Twilt, M., Waldman, A. T., Narula, S., Muscal, E., Deiva, K., Andersen, E., Eyre, M., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000570 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Self-citationHammer, C., Stepniak, B., Schneider, A., Papiol, S., Tantra, M., Begemann, M., Sirén, A.-L., Pardo, L. A., Sperling, S., Mohd Jofrry, S., et al. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2013.110 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Autoantibodies in neurological disease
Prüß, H. (2021) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00543-w · Cited by 321 · see citing works
A score that predicts 1-year functional status in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis
Balu, R., McCracken, L., Lancaster, E., Graus, F., Dalmau, J. O., & Titulaer, M. J. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006783 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-citationAutoimmune Encephalitis: Pathophysiology and Imaging Review of an Overlooked Diagnosis
Kelley, B. P., Patel, S. C., Marin, H. L., Corrigan, J., Mitsias, P. D., & Griffith, B. D. (2017) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a5086 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Manford, M. (2017) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8394-2 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Multicentre comparison of a diagnostic assay: aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica
Waters, P. J., Reindl, M., Saiz, A., Schanda, K., Tuller, F., Král, V., Nytrová, P., Sobek, O., Nielsen, H. H., Barington, T., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-312601 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Self-citationKreye, J., Wenke, N. K., Chayka, M., Leubner, J., Murugan, R., Maier, N., Jurek, B., Ly, L.-T., Brandl, D., Rost, B. R., et al. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww208 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Williams, T. J., Benavides, D. R., Patrice, K.-A., Dalmau, J. O., Avila, A., Le, D. T., Lipson, E. J., Probasco, J. C., & Mowry, E. M. (2016) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.1399 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Self-citationGaspard, N., Hirsch, L. J., Sculier, C., Loddenkemper, T., van Baalen, A., Lancrenon, J., Emmery, M., Specchio, N., Farias‐Moeller, R., Wong, N., et al. (2018) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.14022 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Graus, F., & Dalmau, J. O. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0194-4 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationAutoimmune post–herpes simplex encephalitis of adults and teenagers
Armangué, T., Morís, G., Extremera, V. C., Conde, C. E., Rostasy, K. M., Erro, M. E., Portilla-Cuenca, J. C., Turón‐Viñas, E., Málaga, I., Cabello, B. M., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002125 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationImaging of autoimmune encephalitis – Relevance for clinical practice and hippocampal function
Heine, J., Prüß, H., Bartsch, T., Ploner, C. J., Paul, F., & Finke, C. (2015) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.037 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Tocilizumab in Autoimmune Encephalitis Refractory to Rituximab: An Institutional Cohort Study
Lee, W., Lee, S., Moon, J., Sunwoo, J., Byun, J., Kim, T., Kim, T.-J., Shin, Y., Lee, K., Jun, J., et al. (2016) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0442-6 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Treatment strategies for autoimmune encephalitis
Shin, Y., Lee, S., Park, K., Jung, K., Jung, K., Lee, S. K., & Chu, K. (2017) · Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders · doi:10.1177/1756285617722347 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Evaluation of seizure treatment in anti-LGI1, anti-NMDAR, and anti-GABA B R encephalitis
de Bruijn, M. A. A. M., van Sonderen, A., van Coevorden‐Hameete, M. H., Bastiaansen, A. E. M., Schreurs, M. W. J., Rouhl, R. P. W., van Donselaar, C. A., Majoie, M., Neuteboom, R. F., Smitt, P. A. E. S., et al. (2019) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007475 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Self-citationEncephalitis hospitalization rates and inpatient mortality in the United States, 2000-2010
George, B. P., Schneider, E. B., & Venkatesan, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104169 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Development of the clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis
Lim, J., Lee, S., Moon, J., Jun, J., Kim, T., Shin, Y., Abdullah, S., Byun, J., Sunwoo, J., Kim, K. T., et al. (2019) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25421 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Red Flags: Clinical Signs for Identifying Autoimmune Encephalitis in Psychiatric Patients
Herken, J., & Prüß, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00025 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation: Ways in Which the Immune System Affects the Brain
Ransohoff, R. M., Schafer, D. P., Vincent, A. C., Blachère, N. E., & Bar‐Or, A. (2015) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-015-0385-3 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Acute encephalitis – diagnosis and management
Ellul, M. A., & Solomon, T. (2018) · Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-155 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Al‐Diwani, A., Handel, A. E., Townsend, L., Pollak, T. A., Leite, M. I., Harrison, P. J., Lennox, B., Okai, D., Manohar, S., & Irani, S. R. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30001-x · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Clinical specificities of adult male patients with NMDA receptor antibodies encephalitis
Viaccoz, A., Desestret, V., Ducray, F., Picard, G., Cavillon, G., Rogemond, V., Antoine, J.-C. G., Delattre, J., & Honnorat, J. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000126 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Immune therapy in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic review
Nosadini, M., Mohammad, S. S., Ramanathan, S., Brilot, F., & Dale, R. C. (2015) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/14737175.2015.1115720 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Autoimmune seizures and epilepsy
Geis, C., Planagumà, J., Carreño, M., Graus, F., & Dalmau, J. O. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci125178 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationNMDA receptor encephalitis and other antibody-mediated disorders of the synapse
Dalmau, J. O. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003414 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationNosadini, M., Eyre, M., Molteni, E., Thomas, T. G. S., Irani, S. R., Dalmau, J. O., Dale, R. C., Lim, M. J., International NMDAR Antibody Encephalitis Consensus Group, Anlar, B., et al. (2021) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3188 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationPittock, S. J., & Lucchinetti, C. F. (2015) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12794 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
VGKC-complex/LGI1-antibody encephalitis: Clinical manifestations and response to immunotherapy
Shin, Y., Lee, S., Shin, J.-W., Moon, J., Lim, J., Byun, J., Kim, T., Lee, K., Kim, Y.-S., Park, K., et al. (2013) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.10.005 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, autoimmunity, and psychosis
Kayser, M. S., & Dalmau, J. O. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.007 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationAutoimmune encephalitis: clinical spectrum and management
Uy, C. E., Binks, S. N. M., & Irani, S. R. (2021) · Practical Neurology · doi:10.1136/practneurol-2020-002567 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
International Consensus Recommendations for the Treatment of Pediatric NMDAR Antibody Encephalitis
Nosadini, M., Thomas, T. G. S., Eyre, M., Anlar, B., Armangué, T., Benseler, S. M., Cellucci, T., Deiva, K., Gallentine, W. B., Gombolay, G. Y., et al. (2021) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000001052 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional and structural brain changes in anti–N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor encephalitis
Finke, C., Kopp, U. A., Scheel, M., Pech, L., Soemmer, C., Schlichting, J., Leypoldt, F., Brandt, A. U., Wuerfel, J. T., Probst, C., et al. (2013) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23932 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Rituximab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review
Chisari, C. G., Sgarlata, E., Arena, S., Toscano, S., Luca, M., & Patti, F. (2021) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-020-10362-z · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Balint, B., Vincent, A. C., Meinck, H., Irani, S. R., & Bhatia, K. P. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx189 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Late-onset anti–NMDA receptor encephalitis
Titulaer, M. J., McCracken, L., Gabilondo, I., Iizuka, T., Kawachi, I., Bataller, L., Torrents, A., Rosenfeld, M. R., Balice‐Gordon, R. J., Graus, F., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a4a49c · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationLaurent, C., Capron, J., Quillerou, B., Thomas, G., Alamowitch, S., Fain, O., & MEKINIAN, A. (2016) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2016.09.008 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Anti‐LGI1 encephalitis is associated with unique HLA subtypes
Kim, T., Lee, S., Moon, J., Sunwoo, J., Byun, J., Lim, J., Shin, Y., Jun, J., Lee, H. S., Lee, W., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24860 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Encephalitis with mGluR5 antibodies
Spatola, M., Sabater, L., Planagumà, J., Martínez‐Hernández, E., Armangué, T., Prüß, H., Iizuka, T., Oblitas, R. L. C., Antoine, J.-C. G., Li, R. C., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005614 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationAutoimmune encephalitis as differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis
Armangué, T., Leypoldt, F., & Dalmau, J. O. (2014) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000000087 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationAutoimmune encephalitis update
Dalmau, J. O., & Rosenfeld, M. R. (2014) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou030 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebrospinal Fluid Findings in Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis—A Systematic Analysis
Blinder, T., & Lewerenz, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00804 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Rituximab Treatment and Long-term Outcome of Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis
Thaler, F., Zimmermann, L., Kammermeier, S., Strippel, C., Ringelstein, M., Kraft, A., Sühs, K., Wickel, J., Geis, C., Markewitz, R. D. H., et al. (2021) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000001088 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Rituximab treatment for autoimmune limbic encephalitis in an institutional cohort
Lee, W., Lee, S., Byun, J., Sunwoo, J., Kim, T., Lim, J., Moon, J., Lee, H. S., Shin, Y., Lee, K., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002635 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis: utility and pitfalls for antibody-negative disease
Dalmau, J. O., & Graus, F. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00083-2 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationKępińska, A. P., Iyegbe, C. O., Vernon, A. C., Yolken, R., Murray, R. M., & Pollak, T. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00072 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Cerebellar Ataxia and Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies
Ariño, H., Gresa‐Arribas, N., Blanco, Y., Martínez‐Hernández, E., Sabater, L., Petit‐Pedrol, M., Rouco, I., Bataller, L., Dalmau, J. O., Saiz, A., et al. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1011 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationAcute encephalitis in immunocompetent adults
Venkatesan, A., Michael, B. D., Probasco, J. C., Geocadin, R. G., & Solomon, T. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32526-1 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Mohammad, S. S., Sinclair, K., Pillai, S. C., Merheb, V., Aumann, T. D., Gill, D. S., Dale, R. C., & Brilot, F. (2013) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25623 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
GAD65 neurological autoimmunity
McKeon, A. B., & Tracy, J. A. (2017) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.25565 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Cell‐surface central nervous system autoantibodies: Clinical relevance and emerging paradigms
Irani, S. R., Gelfand, J. M., Al‐Diwani, A., & Vincent, A. C. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24200 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Treatment of MOG-IgG-associated disorder with rituximab: An international study of 121 patients
Whittam, D. H., Cobo‐Calvo, Á., Lopez-Chiriboga, A. S., Pardo, S., Gornall, M., Cicconi, S., Brandt, A. U., Berek, K., Berger, T., Jelčić, I., et al. (2020) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102251 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Investigations on CXCL13 in Anti– N -Methyl- D -Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis
Leypoldt, F., Höftberger, R., Titulaer, M. J., Armangué, T., Gresa‐Arribas, N., Jahn, H., Rostasy, K. M., Schlumberger, W., Meyer, T., Wandinger, K., et al. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2956 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationAntibodies to GABA A receptor α1 and γ2 subunits
Pettingill, P., Kramer, H., Coebergh, J. A., Pettingill, R., Maxwell, S., Nibber, A., Malaspina, A., Jacob, A., Irani, S. R., Buckley, C. J., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001326 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Neuroleptic intolerance in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis
Lejuste, F., Thomas, L., Picard, G., Desestret, V., Ducray, F., Rogemond, V., Psimaras, D., Antoine, J.-C. G., Delattre, J., Groc, L., et al. (2016) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000280 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Prognosticating autoimmune encephalitis: A systematic review
Broadley, J., Seneviratne, U. K., Beech, P., Buzzard, K. A., Butzkueven, H., O'Brien, T. J., & Monif, M. (2018) · Journal of Autoimmunity · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.014 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Graus, F., Ariño, H., & Dalmau, J. O. (2014) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2014-03-537506 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationLennox, B., Palmer-Cooper, E. C., Pollak, T. A., Hainsworth, J., Marks, J., Jacobson, L. W., Lang, B., Fox, H., Ferry, B. L., Scoriels, L., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30375-3 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Seizures and risk of epilepsy in autoimmune and other inflammatory encephalitis
Spatola, M., & Dalmau, J. O. (2017) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000000449 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationThe spectrum of acute encephalitis
Singh, T. D., Fugate, J. E., & Rabinstein, A. A. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001190 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Xu, X., Lü, Q., Huang, Y., Fan, S., Zhou, L., Yuan, J., Yang, X., Ren, H., Sun, D., Dai, Y., et al. (2019) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000633 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Ephrin‐B2 prevents N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor antibody effects on memory and neuroplasticity
Planagumà, J., Haselmann, H., Mannara, F., Petit‐Pedrol, M., Grünewald, B., Aguilar, E., Röpke, L., Martín‐García, E., Titulaer, M. J., Jercog, P. E., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24721 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Titulaer, M. J., McCracken, L., Gabilondo, I., Armangué, T., Glaser, C., Iizuka, T., Honig, L. S., Benseler, S. M., Kawachi, I., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Aguilar, E., Gresa-Arribas, N., Ryan-Florance, N., Torrents, A., Saiz, A., Rosenfeld, M. R., Balice-Gordon, R., Graus, F., & Dalmau, J.
- Affiliations
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
- California Department of Public Health (US)
- Kitasato University Hospital (JP)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Brain Research Institute, Niigata University (JP)
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Dalmau, Josep
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-165
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3563251
- OpenAlex
- W2163022996
- Semantic Scholar
- 620c73775fc208276d59ab7e761fc4b6da598ff4
- Cited by
- 3,165
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 225 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 296 · 2019: 274 · 2018: 222 · 2017: 193 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 169 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 129.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23591236)
- National Institute on Aging (P50AG008702)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH094741)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA089054, R56CA089054, R01CA107192)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RC1NS068204, R01NS077851)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
- Keywords
- anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, NMDA receptor antibodies, immunotherapy, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, tumor resection, long-term outcomes, prognostic factors, modified Rankin Scale, autoimmune encephalitis, children, adults
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Autoantibodies, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunotherapy, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Immunoglobulins, Intravenous, Treatment Outcome, Observation, Young Adult, Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review