Cited by 3,166Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersInfectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis

Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study

Open access
Titulaer, Maarten J, McCracken, Lindsey, Gabilondo, Iñigo, Armangué, Thaís, Glaser, Carol, Iizuka, Takahiro, Honig, Lawrence S, Benseler, Susanne M +11 more·2013·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined. Methods In this multi-institutional observational study (2007-2012), all patients with GluN1 antibodies were assessed at symptom onset and 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Treatment included first-line immunotherapy (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis), second-line immunotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide), and tumor removal. Predictors of outcome were determined at the Universities of Pennsylvania and Barcelona using generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution. Results 577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied, 212 were children (<18 years). Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%). Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy resulting in better outcome than those who did not (OR 2·69, CI 1·24-5·80, p=0·012). During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months), and 30 died. At 24 month follow-up 204/252 (81%) had good outcome. Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months after symptom onset. Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50-0·76, p<0·0001) and lack of ICU admission (OR 0.12, CI 0·06-0·22,p<0·0001). 45 patients had one or multiple relapses (representing a 12% risk within 2 years); 46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001). In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort. Conclusions Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis respond to immunotherapy. Second-line immunotherapy is usually effective when first-line therapies fail. Recovery can take more than 18 months.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In this multi-institutional observational cohort of 577 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, immunotherapy and tumor removal produced good outcome (mRS 0–2) in 394/501 within 24 months, and second-line immunotherapy improved outcomes after first-line failure. Early treatment and no ICU admission predicted good outcome.

Key findings

  • 577 patients (1–85 years, median 21) were studied; 211 (37%) were younger than 18 in the Results (the abstract states 212 children). Of 501 assessable patients, 472 (94%) received first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, and 251 (53%) improved within four weeks.
  • Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy, which was associated with better outcome than no second-line therapy (OR 2·69, CI 1·24–5·80, p=0·012).
  • During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached mRS 0–2 (median 6 months); at 24-month follow-up 203/252 (81%) had good outcome, and 24 (9·5%) died in the Results (the abstract reports 30 died). Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50–0·76, p<0·0001) and lack of ICU admission (OR 0·12, CI 0·06–0·22, p<0·0001).
  • 45 patients had relapses, representing a 12% risk within 2 years; 46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001). In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of second-line immunotherapy effect were comparable to the entire cohort (OR 3·35, CI 0·86–12·98, p=0·081).

Methods

  • Multi-institutional observational study (2007–2012) of patients with GluN1 antibodies from the Universities of Pennsylvania and Barcelona and samples from 200 centers worldwide (32 countries); 577 patients were included for demographic analyses, and 501 had follow-up of at least 4 months (median 24 months, range 4–186).
  • Patients were assessed at symptom onset and 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS); symptoms were categorized into 8 groups. First-line immunotherapy was steroids, IVIg, or plasma exchange; second-line was rituximab or cyclophosphamide; tumor removal was also assessed. Treatment failure was no sustained improvement within four weeks and mRS ≥4.
  • Statistical analysis used Fisher exact, Fisher-Freeman-Halton, or Mann-Whitney U tests; univariable binary logistic regression followed by generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution, subject as random effect, and time point from disease onset included; SAS GLIMMIX version 9.3.

Limitations

  • The paper states the study was not randomized, was observational, and selection bias cannot be ruled out; individual treatments (e.g., plasma exchange vs IVIg or rituximab) could not be compared side-by-side statistically.
  • The paper states there was no predefined protocol establishing order or combination of treatments, and treatment decisions were made by treating physicians based on clinical symptoms, family acceptance of side effects, and drug availability.
  • The paper states that ending follow-up at 24 months likely underestimates recovery and overestimates mortality; imputation analysis estimated 7% mortality at 24 months. The text also shows inconsistent counts between abstract and Results for deaths, children, and 24-month good outcome, which is evident from the paper.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70310-1

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

17 of 23 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationreasoning

    The lower frequency of neurological relapses (12% versus 20-24% reported in previous studies) is likely due to better recognition of the disorder, earlier treatment, and increasing use of second-line immunotherapy.

    “The lower frequency of neurological relapses (12% versus 20-24% reported in previous studies)11, 18 is likely due to better recognition of the disorder, earlier treatment, and increasing use of second-line immunotherapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Irani, 2010, N-methyl-D-aspartate antibody encephalitis: temporal progression of clinical and paraclinical observations in a predominantly non-paraneoplastic disorder of both sexes, Brain source
    • cites [18] Gabilondo, 2011, Analysis of relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis, Neurology source
  • Findingown data

    472 (94%) of 501 assessable patients underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal.

    “Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0.0001).

    “46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Early treatment was a predictor of good outcome (OR 0.62, CI 0.50-0.76, p<0.0001).

    “Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50-0·76, p<0·0001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Lack of ICU admission was a predictor of good outcome (OR 0.12, CI 0.06-0.22, p<0.0001).

    “lack of ICU admission (OR 0.12, CI 0·06-0·22,p<0·0001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • May combine two claims. 44
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Experiments where patients' antibodies were added to cultures of hippocampal neurons or infused into the hippocampus of rodents showed specific antibody-mediated internalization of NMDAR and alteration of the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.

    “Experiments where patients’ antibodies were added to cultures of hippocampal neurons or infused into the hippocampus of rodents showed specific antibody-mediated internalization of NMDAR and alteration of the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.9, 10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Hughes, 2010, Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, J Neurosci source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [10] Mikasova, 2012, Disrupted surface cross-talk between NMDA and Ephrin-B2 receptors in anti-NMDA encephalitis, Brain source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The disorder has been recognized in patients of all ages, but more frequently in young adults and children with or without teratoma.

    “The disorder, named “anti-NMDAR encephalitis”, has since been recognized in patients of all ages, but more frequently in young adults and children with or without teratoma.3, 4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source
    • cites [4] Florance, 2009, Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents, Ann Neurol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patients usually present with acute behavioral change, psychosis and catatonia that evolve to include seizures, memory deficit, dyskinesias, speech problems, and autonomic and breathing dysregulation.

    “Patients usually present with acute behavioral change, psychosis and catatonia that evolve to include seizures, memory deficit, dyskinesias, speech problems, and autonomic and breathing dysregulation.3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source

      The Results (page not supplied) report that most patients presented with psychiatric symptoms and later developed seizures, dyskinesias, autonomic instability, and hypoventilation; some also had speech disturbances. The claimed sequence is not fully supported: the paper describes a catatonic-like state developing after decreased consciousness, while some patients had memory loss at presentation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a center focused on the study of encephalitis of unclear etiology, the frequency of anti-NMDAR encephalitis surpassed that of any specific viral etiologies in young individuals.

    “In a center focused in the study of encephalitis of unclear etiology the frequency of anti-NMDAR encephalitis surpassed that of any specific viral etiologies in young individuals.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Gable, 2012, The Frequency of autoimmune N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project, Clin Infect Dis source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Despite the severity of the disease, patients often improve after intensive care support, immunotherapy, and prolonged hospitalizations that require multidisciplinary care.

    “Despite the severity of the disease, patients often improve after intensive care support, immunotherapy, and prolonged hospitalizations that require multidisciplinary care.3, 11”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source
    • cites [11] Irani, 2010, N-methyl-D-aspartate antibody encephalitis: temporal progression of clinical and paraclinical observations in a predominantly non-paraneoplastic disorder of both sexes, Brain source

      The Results (Clinical outcomes and serial estimations of antibodies; page unavailable) document severe disability, an average hospital stay of 160 days, immunotherapy, and improvement associated with earlier treatment. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes prolonged ventilation and intensive-care admissions. The paper does not establish that multidisciplinary care was required or that intensive-care support itself led to improvement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Epidemiological studies suggest that anti-NMDAR encephalitis is the most common cause of autoimmune encephalitis after acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM).

    “Epidemiological studies suggest that this disorder is the most common cause of autoimmune encephalitis after acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM).5”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Granerod, 2010, Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study, Lancet Infect Dis source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says that about a fifth of patients had immune-mediated encephalitis, mostly ADEM, and reports 16 antibody-associated cases. The Results (page unavailable) identify NMDA receptor antibodies among the causes, but the passages do not establish that anti-NMDAR encephalitis was more common than the other antibody-associated cause after ADEM. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Follow-up information was obtained at regular intervals (4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months) after symptom onset; neurological status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS).

    “Follow-up information was obtained at regular intervals (4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months) after symptom onset; neurological status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS).12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] van Swieten, 1988, Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients, Stroke source

      The Subjects and Methods section says the researchers used the modified Rankin scale to assess handicap in stroke patients. It does not report follow-up at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months; its patients were assessed within the first week or within five months after stroke. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies suggest that the syndrome and response to treatment may differ between children and adults.

    “Moreover, studies suggest that the syndrome and response to treatment may differ between children and adults.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Florance, 2009, Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents, Ann Neurol source

      The Discussion describes differences between children and adults in symptom frequency and presentation, supporting the syndrome portion. It reports mixed responses to immunotherapy in children and suggests this could relate to their lower rate of tumors, but it does not establish a difference in treatment response between children and adults. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    If a tumor is found, removal is important because it expedites improvement and decreases relapses.

    “If a tumor is found, removal is important because it expedites improvement and decreases relapses.3, 17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source

      The Results report fewer relapses after early tumour treatment (1 of 36 versus 14 of 64) and better outcomes when tumours were removed within four months. Initial improvement occurred sooner in the early-treatment group (median 8 versus 11 weeks), but that difference was not statistically significant (p=0.10). The claim overstates the evidence by saying removal itself expedites improvement and decreases relapses; early treatment usually also included immunotherapy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Sabin, 2008, Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 26-2008. A 26-year-old woman with headache and behavioral changes, N Engl J Med source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Samples were considered positive if they fulfilled previously reported criteria including a characteristic pattern of immunostaining of the neuropil of rat brain and specific reactivity with HEK293 cells expressing GluN1 subunits of the NMDAR.

    “Samples were considered positive if they fulfilled previously reported criteria3 including (1) a characteristic pattern of immunostaining of the neuropil of rat brain, and (2) specific reactivity with HEK293 cells expressing GluN1 (also known as NR1) subunits of the NMDAR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Dalmau, 2008, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol source

      The Methods (Patients and procedures; page unavailable) say samples were considered positive when three immunohistochemical criteria were met, and describe testing sera and CSF against NR1-expressing HEK293 cells. Our copy does not specify that rat-brain neuropil immunostaining was one of those positivity criteria, so that part of the attributed description remains unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The discovery of anti-NMDAR encephalitis has changed the diagnostic and treatment approach to several neurologic and psychiatric disorders, and has led to the identification of an expanding group of autoimmune encephalitis related to antibodies against synaptic proteins.

    “The discovery of anti-NMDAR encephalitis has changed the diagnostic and treatment approach to several neurologic and psychiatric disorders, and has led to the identification of an expanding group of autoimmune encephalitis related to antibodies against synaptic proteins.19”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Lancaster, 2012, Neuronal autoantigens—pathogenesis, associated disorders and antibody testing, Nat Rev Neurol source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Rapidly progressive alterations of memory, behavior, cognition, and psychosis previously thought to be idiopathic or viral-induced are now known to be autoimmune.

    “Rapidly progressive alterations of memory, behavior, cognition, and psychosis previously thought to be idiopathic or viral-induced are now known to be autoimmune.20-23”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [20] Chapman, 2011, Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: diagnosis, psychiatric presentation, and treatment, Am J Psychiatry source
    • cites [21] Kayser, 2011, The emerging link between autoimmune disorders and neuropsychiatric disease, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci source

      The “Autoimmune Synaptic Encephalitis” section says limbic encephalitides once thought viral or paraneoplastic commonly have an autoimmune cause and can develop over days to weeks with memory and psychiatric symptoms. The claim overgeneralizes this finding: the paper does not say that rapidly progressive changes of these kinds are all now known to be autoimmune, and it describes some cases as idiopathic autoimmune processes rather than formerly thought idiopathic. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [22] Pruss, 2012, IgA NMDA receptor antibodies are markers of synaptic immunity in slow cognitive impairment, Neurology source

      The Discussion says synaptic autoimmunity can cause acute, severe changes in memory, behavior, and cognition, and the Index patient section describes delusions and hallucinations. But this paper primarily studies slowly progressive impairment; the Clinical course section says none of its seven patients had acute symptoms resembling classic anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Our copy does not establish that these conditions were previously thought to be viral-induced. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [23] Pruss, 2012, NMDA receptor antibodies in herpes simplex encephalitis, Ann Neurol source

      The Abstract’s Interpretation and the Discussion report NMDAR autoantibodies in some patients with herpes simplex encephalitis and suggest that autoimmunity may contribute to their symptoms. They do not establish that the listed memory, behavioral, cognitive, and psychotic symptoms—previously considered idiopathic or viral-induced—are now known to be autoimmune; the Discussion says clinical differences between antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients were not established. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    45 patients had one or multiple relapses, representing a 12% risk within 2 years.

    “45 patients had one or multiple relapses (representing a 12% risk within 2 years)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 patients with median follow-up 24 months.

    “Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort.

    “In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months).

    “During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months), and 30 died.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the 501 patients with at least 4 months follow-up, 461 (92%) were treated with first-line immunotherapy, 134 (27%) with second-line immunotherapy, 10 (2%) with tumor removal without immunotherapy, and 29 (6%) were not treated.

    “Among the 501 patients with at least 4 months follow-up, 461 (92%) were treated with first-line immunotherapy, 134 (27%) with second-line immunotherapy (Figure 2 and Table 2), 10 (2%) with tumor removal without immunotherapy, and 29 (6%) were not treated (see below).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the first month of the disease, 498 of 571 (87%) patients developed four or more of the 8 categories of symptoms; only 6 (1%) remained mono-symptomatic.

    “During the first month of the disease, 498 of 571 (87%) patients developed four or more of the 8 categories of symptoms; only 6 (1%) remained mono-symptomatic (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of 197 patients with teratoma, 189 (96%) had tumor resection, 20 (11%) of them at neurological relapse or after recovery.

    “Of 197 patients with teratoma, 189 (96%) had tumor resection, 20 (11%) of them at neurological relapse or after recovery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MRI of the brain, EEG and CSF studies were abnormal in 180/540 (33%), 432/482 (90%) and 418/532 (79%) patients, respectively.

    “MRI of the brain, EEG and CSF studies were abnormal in 180/540 (33%), 432/482 (90%) and 418/532 (79%) patients, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The presence of a tumor predominated in patients between 12 and 45 years; only 4 females younger than 12 years (6%) and 7 males (6%, all adults) had a tumor (p<0.0005).

    “The presence of a tumor predominated in patients between 12 and 45 years; only 4 females younger than 12 years (6%), and 7 males (6%, all adults) had a tumor (p<0·0005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among patients who received second-line immunotherapy, 84/125 reached an mRS 0-2 during the first 24 months, while among those who did not receive second-line immunotherapy 49/96 reached an mRS 0-2 (median 10 and 15 months, respectively).

    “Among patients who received second line immunotherapy, 84/125 reached an mRS 0-2 during the first 24 months, while among those who did not receive second line immunotherapy 49/96 reached an mRS 0-2 (median 10 and 15 months, respectively); at 24 month follow-up 43/55 (78%) and 32/58 (55%) had a good outcome (Figure 3C and 3D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ten studies and one extended review describing at least three patients were identified; five of them included at least twenty-five patients.

    “Ten studies and one extended review describing at least three patients were identified; five of them included at least twenty-five patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eighty-two of 177 (46%) children failed first-line immunotherapy; in these patients, the magnitude of the effects of second-line immunotherapy (used in 53 cases, 65%) was comparable to that of the entire cohort although due to the smaller sample size it did not reach significance (OR 3.35, CI 0.86-12.98, p=0.081).

    “Eighty-two of 177 (46%) children failed first-line immunotherapy; in these patients, the magnitude of the effects of second-line immunotherapy (used in 53 cases, 65%; Table S5) was comparable to that of the entire cohort although due to the smaller sample size it did not reach significance (Table S6B, OR 3·35, CI 0·86-12·98, p=0·081).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the 24 month follow-up, 45 patients (representing a 12% risk) had clinical relapses, which in 15 patients (33%) were multiple.

    “During the 24 month follow-up, 45 patients (representing a 12% risk) had clinical relapses, which in 15 patients (33%) were multiple (Table S4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study confirms the female preponderance, the high frequency of the disease in children, and a higher risk for an underlying teratoma in African-Americans.

    “It confirms the female preponderance, the high frequency of the disease in children, and a higher risk for an underlying teratoma in African-Americans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    ICU stay and time from symptom onset until initiation of treatment were identified as significant prognostic factors.

    “however, “ICU stay” and “time from symptom onset until initiation of treatment” were identified as significant prognostic factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    207 tumors (94%) were ovarian teratomas, 4 (2%) extraovarian teratomas, and 9 (4%) other tumors.

    “Two hundred and seven tumors (94%) were ovarian teratomas, 4 (2%) extraovarian teratomas, and 9 (4%) other tumors (two of each, lung, breast, testicular; one ovarian carcinoma, one thymic carcinomas, and one pancreatic cancer).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    211 (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years.

    “Two hundred and eleven (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years, and 28 (5%) were 45 or older.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the first 24 months, 241/251 patients who improved with first-line therapy reached an mRS 0-2 (median 3 months); at 24 month follow-up 111/115 (97%) had a good outcome.

    “During the first 24 months 241/251 reached an mRS 0-2 (median 3 months); at 24 month follow-up 111/115 (97%) of these patients had a good outcome (Figure 3B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 16 relapses (23%) the severity of symptoms was comparable to that of the initial episode, and in 7 (10%) was worse.

    “In 16 relapses (23%) the severity of symptoms was comparable to that of the initial episode, and in 7 (10%) was worse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    495/571 patients (87%) had a maximum mRS of 5, and 435 (77%) were admitted to the ICU.

    “The assessment of disease severity showed that 495/571 patients (87%) had a maximum mRS of 5, and 435 (77%) were admitted to the ICU.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared with the initial episode, 46/69 (67%) relapses were less severe, more frequently mono-symptomatic (24, 35%), and resulted in fewer admissions (12, 17%) to the ICU (all p<0.0001).

    “Compared with the initial episode, 46/69 (67%) relapses were less severe (as reflected by a lower mRS score measured at the stage of maximum severity), more frequently mono-symptomatic (24, 35%), and resulted in fewer admissions (12, 17%) to the ICU (all p<0·0001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    28 (5%) of all 577 patients were 45 or older.

    “Two hundred and eleven (37%) of all 577 patients were younger than 18 years, and 28 (5%) were 45 or older.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    468 patients were female (81%).

    “Four hundred and sixty-eight patients were female (81%; Figure 1A and Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Movement disorders were more frequent in children, while memory deficits and central hypoventilation occurred more often in adults.

    “While movement disorders were more frequent in children, memory deficits and central hypoventilation occurred more often in adults (Figure 1C).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the current study, the frequency of relapses was somewhat less frequent than in previous reports; in addition, the milder nature of the symptoms compared with the initial episodes was noted in most relapses.

    “In the current study, the frequency of relapses was somewhat less frequent than in previous reports; in addition, the milder nature of the symptoms compared with the initial episodes was noted in most relapses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    First-line immunotherapy was often insufficient to control the disease; in this group, the addition of second-line immunotherapy proved to associate significantly with a better outcome compared with those who did not receive second-line immunotherapy.

    “First-line immunotherapy was often insufficient to control the disease; in this group of patients the addition of second-line immunotherapy proved to associate significantly with a better outcome compared with those who did not receive second-line immunotherapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 24 month follow-up 43/55 (78%) of those who received second-line immunotherapy and 32/58 (55%) of those who did not had a good outcome.

    “at 24 month follow-up 43/55 (78%) and 32/58 (55%) had a good outcome (Figure 3C and 3D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Second-line immunotherapy was well tolerated; only 4 patients had serious adverse effects, all reversible.

    “Second-line immunotherapy was well tolerated; only 4 patients had serious adverse effects, all reversible (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    220 (38%) patients had an underlying neoplasm; of these, 213 were women (representing 46% of all women).

    “Two hundred and twenty (38%) patients had an underlying neoplasm; of these, 213 were women (representing 46% of all women).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In univariable analysis, factors associated with good outcome included no need for ICU (p<0.0001), early treatment (p=0.009), and low severity of disease within four weeks of onset (maximum mRS, p=0.011).

    “In univariable analysis, the factors associated with good outcome included, no need for ICU (p<0·0001), early treatment (p=0·009), and low severity of disease within four weeks of onset (maximum mRS, p=0·011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Six of the nine patients with tumors other than teratomas were older than 45 years.

    “Six of the nine patients with tumors other than teratomas were older than 45 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    238 adults (65%) presented with behavioral problems, while 55 children below 12 years (50%) presented with seizures or movement disorders.

    “Two hundred and thirty-eight adults (65%) presented with behavioral problems, while 55 children below 12 years (50%) presented with seizures or movement disorders (Figure 1B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The frequency of males was higher in age groups below 12 years (43: 39%) and above 45 (12: 43%, p<0.0001).

    “The frequency of males was higher in age groups below 12 years (43: 39%) and above 45 (12: 43%, p<0·0001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder.

    “Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Factors associated with a good outcome (p<0.1) were included in generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution, declaring the subject as random and the other factors as fixed effects.

    “Factors associated with a good outcome (p<0·1) were included in generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution, declaring the subject as random and the other factors as fixed effects.13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Verbeke, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    After failing first-line immunotherapy, all these patients remained in a similar poor neurological status, enabling the comparison between those who subsequently received second-line immunotherapy with those who did not.

    “Indeed, after failing first-line immunotherapy, all these patients remained in a similar poor neurological status, enabling the comparison between those who subsequently received second-line immunotherapy with those who did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All mRS scores at defined time points were used, and the time point from onset of disease was included as an additional variable.

    “All mRS scores at defined time points were used (4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months; e.g. each patient’s follow-up could provide a maximum of 5 scores). The “time point from onset of disease” was included as an additional variable, allowing us to analyze patients with different duration of follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study has the limitations of not being randomized but sets the base for future trials to determine the efficacy of each individual treatment and duration of immunotherapy.

    “Our study has the limitations of not being randomized but sets the base for future trials to determine the efficacy of each individual treatment (e.g., steroids, IVIg, plasmapheresis, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide) and duration of immunotherapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    After creation of the model, the effect of second-line immunotherapy was determined by adding second-line immunotherapy to the same model applied to only those patients who had failed first-line immunotherapy.

    “After creation of this model, the effect of second-line immunotherapy was determined by adding second-line immunotherapy to the same model applied to only those patients who had failed first-line immunotherapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Symptom presentation varied between children and adults, but in most cases the progression of symptoms evolved towards a similar syndrome.

    “Symptom presentation varied between children and adults (“more neurological in children”, “more psychiatric in adults”), but in most cases the progression of symptoms evolved towards a similar syndrome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By establishing the last follow-up assessment at 24 months, the study likely underestimates the frequency and level of recovery because some patients had a shorter follow-up, others continued to improve after 24 months, and those with substantial improvement tended to discontinue follow-ups.

    “By establishing the last follow-up assessment at 24 months, our study likely underestimates the frequency and level of recovery because some patients had a shorter follow-up, others continued to improve after 24 months, and those with substantial improvement tended to discontinue follow-ups (Figure S5A and B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    This is the first study to provide extensive and structured follow-up and prognostic factors determining outcome.

    “This is the first study to provide extensive and structured follow-up and prognostic factors determining outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For the same reasons, the frequency of mortality is likely overestimated; imputation analysis estimated 7% mortality at 24 months.

    “For the same reasons, the frequency of mortality is likely overestimated; imputation analysis estimated 7% mortality at 24 months (Figure S5C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Although selection bias cannot be ruled out in observational studies like this, the authors could not identify obvious bias between patients who after failing first-line therapies were treated with second-line therapy and those who did not: severity of symptoms and duration of ICU stay was similar (92% vs 88%, and 88% vs 87%, respectively), and there were no differences in age, gender, ethnicity,和

    “Although selection bias cannot be ruled out in observational studies like this, we could not identify obvious bias between patients who after failing first-line therapies were treated with second-line therapy and those who did not: the severity of symptoms and duration of ICU stay was similar (92% vs 88%, and 88% vs 87%, respectively), and there were no differences in age, gender, ethnicity, and”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    Our study extends epidemiological and clinical knowledge on anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

    “Our study extends epidemiological and clinical knowledge on anti-NMDAR encephalitis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All patients tested positive for NMDAR antibodies were included without selection criteria other than availability of clinical information.

    “All patients tested positive for NMDAR antibodies were included in the study without selection criteria other than availability of clinical information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Factors influencing outcome were assessed by univariable binary logistic regression independently of the treatments given.

    “Factors influencing outcome were assessed by univariable binary logistic regression (good outcome defined as mRS 0-2) independently of the treatments given.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Patients with a follow-up shorter than 4 months were excluded from analysis of effects of treatment and outcome.

    “Patients with a follow-up shorter than 4 months were excluded from analysis of effects of treatment and outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Second-line immunotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide or both significantly improved the outcome of those who did not respond to first-line therapy, and decreased the frequency of relapses.

    “Moreover, second-line immunotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide or both significantly improved the outcome of those who did not respond to first-line therapy, and decreased the frequency of relapses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This large observational study demonstrates that immunotherapy and tumor removal if applicable result in substantial neurological improvement in 81% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis after a median follow-up of 24 months.

    “This large, observational study demonstrates that immunotherapy and tumor removal if applicable, result in substantial neurological improvement in 81% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis after a median follow-up of 24 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
62 of 62
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome in anti-NMDAR encephalitis have not been defined.

    “Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The efficacy of immunotherapy and its impact in the long-term outcome have not been established.

    “However, the efficacy of immunotherapy and its impact in the long-term outcome have not been established.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A substantial number of patients fail to respond to first-line immunotherapy, and for these patients the treatment strategy and outcome are unknown.

    “A substantial number of patients fail to respond to first-line immunotherapy, such as steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and for these patients the treatment strategy and outcome are unknown.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A systematic analysis of the effects of sequential immunotherapy and their impact on long-term outcome has not been previously done in any of these disorders or other antibody-mediated neurological diseases.

    “To our knowledge, a systematic analysis of the effects of sequential (first-, second-line) immunotherapy and their impact on long-term outcome has not been previously done in any of these disorders or other antibody-mediated neurological diseases.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting number of children in the cohort

    Minor

    The abstract reports 212 patients younger than 18, while the demographics section reports 211 among the same 577 patients.

  • Conflicting good-outcome counts at 24 months

    Minor

    The abstract reports 204 of 252 patients with a good outcome at 24 months, but the results section reports 203 of 252. Both figures are printed as 81%.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Titulaer, M. J., McCracken, L., Gabilondo, I., Armangué, T., Glaser, C., Iizuka, T., Honig, L. S., Benseler, S. M., Kawachi, I., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Aguilar, E., Gresa-Arribas, N., Ryan-Florance, N., Torrents, A., Saiz, A., Rosenfeld, M. R., Balice-Gordon, R., Graus, F., & Dalmau, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
  • California Department of Public Health (US)
  • Kitasato University Hospital (JP)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Brain Research Institute, Niigata University (JP)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Dalmau, Josep
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
157-165
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163022996
Cited by
3,165
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 225 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 296 · 2019: 274 · 2018: 222 · 2017: 193 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 169 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 4
FWCI
129.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23591236)
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG008702)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH094741)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA089054, R56CA089054, R01CA107192)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RC1NS068204, R01NS077851)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
Keywords
anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, NMDA receptor antibodies, immunotherapy, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, tumor resection, long-term outcomes, prognostic factors, modified Rankin Scale, autoimmune encephalitis, children, adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Autoantibodies, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunotherapy, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Immunoglobulins, Intravenous, Treatment Outcome, Observation, Young Adult, Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review