Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted exome sequencing of suspected mitochondrial disorders

Open access
Lieber, Daniel S., Calvo, Sarah E., Shanahan, Kristy, Slate, Nancy G., Liu, Shangtao, Hershman, Steven G., Gold, Nina B., Chapman, Brad A., Thorburn, David R., Berry, Gerard T., Schmahmann, Jeremy D., Borowsky, Mark L., Mueller, David M., Sims, Katherine B., Mootha, Vamsi K.·2013·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of targeted exome sequencing for the molecular diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders, which exhibit marked phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. METHODS: We considered a diverse set of 102 patients with suspected mitochondrial disorders based on clinical, biochemical, and/or molecular findings, and whose disease ranged from mild to severe, with varying age at onset. We sequenced the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) and the exons of 1,598 nuclear-encoded genes implicated in mitochondrial biology, mitochondrial disease, or monogenic disorders with phenotypic overlap. We prioritized variants likely to underlie disease and established molecular diagnoses in accordance with current clinical genetic guidelines. RESULTS: Targeted exome sequencing yielded molecular diagnoses in established disease loci in 22% of cases, including 17 of 18 (94%) with prior molecular diagnoses and 5 of 84 (6%) without. The 5 new diagnoses implicated 2 genes associated with canonical mitochondrial disorders (NDUFV1, POLG2), and 3 genes known to underlie other neurologic disorders (DPYD, KARS, WFS1), underscoring the phenotypic and biochemical overlap with other inborn errors. We prioritized variants in an additional 26 patients, including recessive, X-linked, and mtDNA variants that were enriched 2-fold over background and await further support of pathogenicity. In one case, we modeled patient mutations in yeast to provide evidence that recessive mutations in ATP5A1 can underlie combined respiratory chain deficiency. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that targeted exome sequencing is an effective alternative to the sequential testing of mtDNA and individual nuclear genes as part of the investigation of mitochondrial disease. Our study underscores the ongoing challenge of variant interpretation in the clinical setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182918c40

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Lieber, D. S., Calvo, S. E., Shanahan, K., Slate, N. G., Liu, S., Hershman, S. G., Gold, N. B., Chapman, B. A., Thorburn, D. R., Berry, G. T., Schmahmann, J. D., Borowsky, M. L., Mueller, D. M., Sims, K. B., & Mootha, V. K.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2013-05-07
Volume
80
Issue
19
Pages
1762-1770
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2043174838
Cited by
188
References
5
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted exome sequencing of suspected mitochondrial disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182918c40
The paper
Lieber, D. S., Calvo, S. E., Shanahan, K., Slate, N. G., Liu, S., Hershman, S. G., Gold, N. B., Chapman, B. A., Thorburn, D. R., Berry, G. T., Schmahmann, J. D., Borowsky, M. L., Mueller, D. M., Sims, K. B., & Mootha, V. K. (2013). Targeted exome sequencing of suspected mitochondrial disorders. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182918c40

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.