Low-dose propranolol and exercise capacity in postural tachycardia syndrome: A randomized study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of low-dose propranolol on maximal exercise capacity in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). METHODS: We compared the effect of placebo vs a single low dose of propranolol (20 mg) on peak oxygen consumption (VO2max), an established measure of exercise capacity, in 11 patients with POTS and 7 healthy subjects in a randomized, double-blind study. Subjects exercised on a semirecumbent bicycle, with increasing intervals of resistance to maximal effort. RESULTS: Maximal exercise capacity was similar between groups following placebo. Low-dose propranolol improved VO2max in patients with POTS (24.5 ± 0.7 placebo vs 27.6 ± 1.0 mL/min/kg propranolol; p = 0.024), but not healthy subjects. The increase in VO2max in POTS was associated with attenuated peak heart rate responses (142 ± 8 propranolol vs 165 ± 4 bpm placebo; p = 0.005) and improved stroke volume (81 ± 4 propranolol vs 67 ± 3 mL placebo; p = 0.013). In a separate cohort of POTS patients, neither high-dose propranolol (80 mg) nor metoprolol (100 mg) improved VO2max, despite similar lowering of heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that nonselective β-blockade with propranolol, when used at the low doses frequently used for treatment of POTS, may provide a modest beneficial effect to improve heart rate control and exercise capacity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that a single low dose of propranolol (20 mg) as compared with placebo is useful in increasing maximum exercise capacity measured 1 hour after medication.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A limited number of prior studies have examined the effects of propranolol or ivabradine on POTS.
“A limited number of prior studies have examined the effects of propranolol or ivabradine on POTS.4,6,9, 10, 11, 12”
From A Randomized Crossover Trial of Ivabradine, Propranolol, and Placebo in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Propranolol improves exercise capacity in patients with POTS.
“a small, randomized, double-blind study in 2013 showed improved exercise capacity46 in patients with POTS.”
From Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
The reported prevalence of deconditioning in POTS varies widely, from 20% to 90% of patients, depending on recruitment site and exercise protocol.
“The true prevalence of deconditioning in POTS also remains unclear, with studies showing large variations ranging from 20 to 90% of patients depending on site of patient recruitment and exercise protocols (Parsaik et al., 2012;Burkhardt et al., 2011;Arnold et al., 2013).”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis (2018) · cites this paper as Arnold et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fouad FM, Tadena-Thome L, Bravo EL, Tarazi RC. Idio- pathic hypovolemia. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:298-303.
- Medow MS, Stewart JM. The postural tachycardia syn- drome. Cardiol Rev 2007;15:67-75.
- Authors
- Arnold, A. C., Okamoto, L. E., Diedrich, A., Paranjape, S. Y., Raj, S. R., Biaggioni, I., & Gamboa, A.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2013-05-21
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1927-1933
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC3716342
- OpenAlex
- W1979733525
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (11POST7330010)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000445, HL056693)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL095905, P01HL056693, R01HL102387)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007569)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS065736)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, propranolol, low-dose beta-blocker, exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, rate control, stroke volume, metoprolol, beta-adrenergic blockade
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Oxygen Consumption, Propranolol, Cross-Over Studies, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review