Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,491

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children

Friedman, Deborah I., Liu, Grant T., Digre, Kathleen B.·2013·Neurology

Abstract

The pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) may be primary (idiopathic intracranial hypertension) or arise from an identifiable secondary cause. Characterization of typical neuroimaging abnormalities, clarification of normal opening pressure in children, and features distinguishing the syndrome of intracranial hypertension without papilledema from intracranial hypertension with papilledema have furthered our understanding of this disorder. We propose updated diagnostic criteria for PTCS to incorporate advances and insights into the disorder realized over the past 10 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a55f17

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,491

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, D. I., Liu, G. T., & Digre, K. B.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2013-09-24
Volume
81
Issue
13
Pages
1159-1165
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2111279651
Cited by
1,491
References
0
FWCI
31.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a55f17
The paper
Friedman, D. I., Liu, G. T., & Digre, K. B. (2013). Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a55f17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.