Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thalamic infarcts: Clinical syndromes, etiology, and prognosis

Bogousslavsky, Julien, Regli, Franco, Uske, Antoine·1988·Neurology

Abstract

We studied forty patients with CT-proven thalamic infarcts without involvement of the superficial territory of the posterior cerebral artery. The delineation into four arterial thalamic territories (inferolateral, tuberothalamic, posterior choroidal, paramedian) corresponded clinically to four different syndromes. The most common etiologies were lacunar infarction, large artery atherosclerosis with presumed artery-to-artery embolism, cardioembolism, and migrainous stroke. We found no risk factor other than age or oral contraceptive use in six patients. One patient died in the acute phase. During follow-up (45.6 months), the stroke or death rate was 7.4% per year. Delayed pain developed in three patients and abnormal movements in three. Late disability was mainly secondary to persisting neuropsychological dysfunction (thalamic dementia).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.38.6.837

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bogousslavsky, J., Regli, F., & Uske, A.
Affiliations
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs. Bogousslavsky and Regli) and Radiology (Dr. Uske), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1988-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
837-837
ISSN
  • 0028-3878
  • 1526-632X
Cited by
465
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review