Cited by 147Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measurement and prediction of functional capacity in Alzheimer's disease

Abstract

Functional loss in Alzheimer's disease is difficult to measure or predict. The Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (Part 1) correlates well with postmortem changes but is not an effective antemortem index of functional change since disparate behavioral domains are assessed. We performed a factor analysis of the Blessed items in 187 patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease and identified 4 independent factors: (I) cognitive, (II) personality, (III) apathy, and (IV) basic self-care. An endpoint, consisting of a score indicative of moderate disability, was determined for each factor. We then used life table analyses to compare the probability of reaching these endpoints over time in longitudinally followed patients. Patients with extrapyramidal signs at their initial visit reached the factor IV endpoint sooner, and those with psychosis or no family history of dementia also reached the factor I endpoint faster. These data illustrate the utility of a multifactorial approach to the assessment of functional capacity in Alzheimer's disease, and also indicate that extrapyramidal symptoms and psychosis are powerful predictors of the rate of decline in basic self-care activities and cognition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.40.1.8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Metadata

Authors
Stern, Y., Hesdorffer, D., Sano, M., & Mayeux, R.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1990-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2120924264
Cited by
147
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG08702, AG 07370, P01AG007232, AG 07232, P50AG008702)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, functional capacity, factor analysis, cognitive decline, personality, apathy, extrapyramidal signs, psychosis, family history of dementia, functional decline prediction, life table analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Disorders, Predictive Value of Tests, Self Care, Social Isolation, Life Tables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review