Cited by 1,128Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Jack, Clifford R., Petersen, Ronald C., Xu, Yue Cheng, Waring, Stephen C., O'Brien, Peter C., Tangalos, Eric G., Smith, Glenn E., Ivnik, Robert J. +1 more·1997·Neurology

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric measurements of medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures can discriminate between normal elderly control subjects and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) of moderate to advanced severity. In terms of clinical utility, however, a more important issue concerns the ability of the technique to differentiate between normal elderly control subjects and AD patients with the very mildest form of the disease. We performed MRI-based volumetric measurements of the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and amygdala in 126 cognitively normal elderly control subjects and 94 patients with probable AD. The diagnosis of AD was made according to NINDS/ADRDA criteria, and disease severity was categorized by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. Patients with CDR 0.5 were classified as very mild, CDR 1 as mild, and CDR 2 as moderate disease severity. Volumes of each structure declined with increasing age in control subjects and did so in parallel for men and women. The volume of each measured MTL structure also declined with age in patients with AD. The volume of each MTL structure was significantly smaller in AD patients than control subjects (p < 0.001). Of the several MTL measures, the total hippocampal volumetric measurements were best at discriminating control subjects from AD patients. The mean hippocampal volumes for AD patients relative to control subjects by severity of disease were as follows: very mild AD (CDR 0.5) -1.75 SD below the control mean, mild AD (CDR 1) -1.99 SD, and moderate AD (CDR 2) -2.22 SD. Age- and gender-adjusted, normalized MRI-based hippocampal volumetric measurements provide a sensitive marker of the MTL neuroanatomic degeneration in AD early in the disease process.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

MRI-based volumetric measurements of medial temporal lobe structures, especially the hippocampus, distinguish cognitively normal elderly controls from patients with probable Alzheimer's disease, including those with only very mild disease (CDR 0.5). Age- and gender-adjusted normalized hippocampal volumes are a sensitive marker of MTL degeneration early in AD.

Key findings

  • In 126 controls and 94 AD patients, volumes of the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), and amygdala were significantly smaller in AD than controls (P<.001); total hippocampal volume best discriminated the groups.
  • Mean hippocampal volume deficits relative to controls, expressed as W scores (age/gender-adjusted normal deviates), were −1.75 SD for very mild AD (CDR 0.5), −1.99 SD for mild AD (CDR 1), and −2.22 SD for moderate AD (CDR 2); all mean W scores differed significantly from 0 (P<.001).
  • At a fixed specificity of 80%, sensitivity of hippocampal volume for discriminating controls from cases was 77.8% (CDR 0.5), 83.7% (CDR 1), and 86.7% (CDR 2); 97.2% of CDR 0.5 patients fell below the 50th percentile of normal.
  • MTL volumes declined linearly with age in both controls and AD patients, with parallel slopes; the hippocampal head showed the greatest age-related decline and the largest control–AD difference. Mean non-normalized decline in controls was 45.63 mm³/year for total hippocampus and 46.65 mm³/year for PHG.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional study of 220 subjects (126 cognitively normal controls, 94 probable AD patients diagnosed by NINCDS/ADRDA criteria) recruited from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Center/Patient Registry; AD severity staged by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR 0.5 = very mild, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate).
  • MRI at 1.5T using a T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence (124 contiguous 1.6 mm partitions); hippocampus, PHG, and amygdala manually traced by a single blinded research assistant, with blinded three-member panel review; intra-rater test-retest coefficient of variation for hippocampal volume 1.9%.
  • Volumes normalized to total intracranial volume; stepwise regression for age/gender associations, age- and gender-specific percentiles converted to W scores, ANOVA/paired t tests for structure comparisons, and stepwise linear discriminant analysis to identify best discriminating measures.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: PHG measurements were not possible in 16 controls and 14 AD patients because a clearly identifiable collateral sulcus was absent along the entire antero-posterior extent; the sample is cross-sectional, so secular effects of different environmental or socioeconomic conditions across age groups may be unrecognized; controls included subjects with medical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease, which may account for some age-related volume loss; absolute numeric output of any image-based volume measurement is methodology-dependent, so specific values may vary across sites; hippocampal volume will not discriminate among conditions sharing MTL atrophy; and predicting future AD in currently normal or mildly impaired subjects requires longitudinal studies still in progress.
  • Evident from the text: the study population is drawn from a single Mayo Clinic primary-care/registry pool, and the amygdala's anterior boundary is described as ill-defined and defined operationally, which may limit generalizability and measurement precision.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.49.3.786

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The mean hippocampal volume for mild Alzheimer's disease patients (CDR 1) was 1.99 SD below the control mean.

    “The mean hippocampal volumes for AD patients relative to controls by severity of disease were as follows: very mild AD (CDR 0.5) - 1.75 SD below the control mean, mild AD (CDR 1) - 1.99 SD, and moderate AD (CDR 2) - 2.22 SD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Of the several medial temporal lobe measures, total hippocampal volume measurements were best at discriminating controls from Alzheimer's disease cases.

    “Of the several MTL measures, the total hippocampal volume measurements were best at discriminating controls from AD cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In cognitively normal elderly controls, the volumes of each measured medial temporal lobe structure declined with increasing age in a linear fashion.

    “Volumes of each structure declined with increasing age in control subjects and did so in parallel for men and women.”
    • Also stated in: § Control Subjects · plain
      “Normalized MTL volumes declined with age in a linear fashion([Table 2](#T2), [Figure 2](#F2)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cross-sectional decline in medial temporal lobe volumes with age observed in controls reflects the effect of normal aging rather than cohort or other differences.
  • Findingown data

    The volume of each measured medial temporal lobe structure declined with age in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    “The volume of each measured MTL structure also declined with age in patients with AD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The mean hippocampal volume for moderate Alzheimer's disease patients (CDR 2) was 2.22 SD below the control mean.

    “The mean hippocampal volumes for AD patients relative to controls by severity of disease were as follows: very mild AD (CDR 0.5) - 1.75 SD below the control mean, mild AD (CDR 1) - 1.99 SD, and moderate AD (CDR 2) - 2.22 SD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although all MTL limbic structures measured were significantly smaller in AD patients than controls, the structure which best discriminated between AD patients and controls was the total hippocampal volume.

    “Although all the MTL limbic structures measured were significantly smaller in AD patients than controls, the structure which best discriminated between AD patients and controls was the total hippocampal volume.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within the hippocampus, volumes differed significantly among the head, body, and tail, and pairwise differences between head and body, and body and tail were significant.

    “Within the hippocampus, volumes differed significantly among the head, body, and tail (P = <.001, ANOVA), and pairwise differences between the head and body, and body and tail were also significant (P<.001, paired t-tests).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two hundred twenty subjects were included in the study: 126 controls and 94 Alzheimer's disease patients.

    “Two-hundred-twenty subjects are included in this report—126 controls and 94 AD patients ([Table 1](#T1)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant hemispheric differences in age-related volume loss were observed in any medial temporal lobe structure except the parahippocampal gyrus, where the age-related volume loss was greater on the left than the right side (P = .024).

    “No significant hemispheric differences in volume loss with age were observed in any MTL structure, except the PHG where the age related volume loss was greater on the left than the right side (P = .024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Mean total intracranial volume in controls was 1393 cm3 (SD 133 cm3).

    “Mean total intracranial volume in controls was 1393cm3 (SD 133cm3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean non-normalized volumetric decline with age was 45.63 mm3/year for the total hippocampus, 27.43 for the hippocampal head, 8.84 for the hippocampal body, 9.68 for the hippocampal tail, 46.65 for the parahippocampal gyrus, and 20.75 for the amygdala.

    “The mean non-normalized volumetric decline with age was 45.63 mm3/year for the total hippocampus; 27.43 for the hippocampal head; 8.84 for the hippocampal body; 9.68 for the hippocampal tail; 46.65 for the PHG; and 20.75 for the amygdala.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The magnitude of the volumetric deficit in AD patients relative to controls differed significantly among hippocampus, PHG, and amygdala, with all pairwise comparisons significant.

    “The differences among hippocampus, PHG, and amygdala were significant (P = <.001, ANOVA), and all pairwise comparisons (paired t-tests) were also significant (hippocampus vs. amygdala, P<.001; hippocampus vs. PHG, P<.001, amygdala vs. PHG, P=.006)([Table 4](#T4)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Among AD patients, unnormalized MTL volumes were generally larger among men than women.

    “unnormalized volumes were generally larger among men than women”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At a fixed specificity of 80%, the sensitivity of hippocampal volume measurements in discriminating controls from cases was 77.8% for CDR=0.5, 83.7% for CDR=1, and 86.7% for CDR=2.

    “For example, at a fixed specificity of 80% the sensitivity of hippocampal volume measurements in discriminating controls from cases was 77.8% for CDR=0.5; 83.7% CDR=1; and 86.7% for CDR=2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In AD patients, age and gender adjusted normalized MTL volumes were significantly smaller than those of controls, for each MTL structure, at all ages, and for both men and women.

    “However, the age and gender adjusted normalized MTL volumes of AD patients were significantly smaller than those of controls. This was true for each MTL structure, at all ages, and for both men and women.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pairwise comparison of W scores were significant for the total hippocampus between CDR 0.5 vs 1.0 (p<0.01) and CDR 1.0 vs 2.0 (p<0.01).

    “Pairwise comparison of the W scores were also significant for the total hippocampus—CDR 0.5 vs 1.0 (P < 0.01), CDR 1.0 vs 2.0 (P < 0.01) (Rank Sum Test).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Dementia Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Exam scores declined with increasing CDR grade in Alzheimer's disease patients.

    “As expected, Dementia Rating Scale([39](#R39)) and Mini-Mental State Exam ([40](#R40)) scores declined with increasing CDR grade in AD patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The segment of the hippocampus showing the greatest decline with age was the head.

    “The segment of the hippocampus showing the greatest decline with age was the head.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean hippocampal volume in very mild (CDR 0.5) AD patients was 1.75 SD below the control mean, and 97.2% of all CDR 0.5 AD patients had hippocampal volumes below the 50th percentile of normal.

    “The mean hippocampal volume in very mild (CDR 0.5) AD patients was 1.75 SD below the control mean and 97.2% of all CDR 0.5 AD patients had hippocampal volumes below the 50th percentile of normal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cerebral atrophy is a well accepted biological concomitant of Alzheimer's disease.

    “A well accepted biological concomitant of AD is cerebral atrophy([4](#R4)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] DeCarli C, Kaye JA, Horwitz B, Rapoport SI. Critical analysis of the use of computer-assisted transverse axial tomography to study human brain in aging and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology. 1990;40:872–883. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.6.872. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.40.6.872)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2189080/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Neurology&title=Critical%20analysis%20of%20the%20use%20of%20computer-assisted%20transverse%20axial%20tomography%20to%20study%20human%20brain%20in%20aging%20and%20dementia%20of%20the%20Alzhei source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Most previous studies of MRI-based medial temporal lobe volumetry have included primarily subjects with Alzheimer's disease of moderate severity.

    “Most previous studies have included primarily subjects with AD of moderate severity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    MRI-based volume measurements of the medial temporal lobe have been proposed as a clinically useful test for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

    “Based on initial studies, MRI-based volume measurements of the MTL have been proposed as a clinically useful test for the diagnosis of AD([13](#R13)-[21](#R21)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13]-[21]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in individuals over 60 years of age.

    “Alzheimer's disease(AD) is the most common cause of dementia in individuals over 60 years of age([1](#R1)-[3](#R3)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1]-[3]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Medial temporal lobe limbic structures are involved earliest and most extensively in the pathology of Alzheimer's disease.

    “MTL limbic structures are involved earliest and most extensively in the pathology of AD([6](#R6), [7](#R7));”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6], [7]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The most important test of the utility of MRI-based medial temporal lobe volumetry is in patients with very mild Alzheimer's disease, in whom diagnostic decision making is difficult.

    “The most important test of the utility of the technique would be in patients with very mild AD in whom the diagnostic decision making process is difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Hippocampal measurements have less measurement error and less noise introduced as a function of normal anatomic variation than those of the PHG or amygdala.

    “Hippocampal measurements therefore have less measurement error and also less “noise” introduced as a function of normal anatomic variation than those of the PHG or amygdala ([57](#R57)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Laakso MP, Partanen K, Lehtovirta M, et al. MRI of amygdala fails to diagnose early Alzheimer's disease. NeuroReport. 1995;6:2414–2418. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199511270-00032. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199511270-00032)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8747165/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=NeuroReport&title=MRI%20of%20amygdala%20fails%20to%20diagnose%20early%20Alzheimer's%20disease.&author=MP%20Laakso&author=K%20Partanen&author=M%20Lehtovirta&volume=6&publication_year=1995&pages=2414-2418&pmid=8747165&doi=10.1097/00001756-199511270

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Disease severity in Alzheimer's disease patients was assessed by the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (very mild CDR 0.5; mild CDR 1; moderate CDR 2).

    “Disease severity in AD patients was assessed by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale; very mild - CDR 0.5; mild - CDR 1; moderate - CDR 2([28](#R28)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Morris JC. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412–2414. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8232972/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Neurology&title=The%20clinical%20dementia%20rating%20(CDR):%20current%20version%20and%20scoring%20rules.&author=JC%20Morris&volume=43&publication_year=1993&pages=2412-2414&pmid=8232972&doi=10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a&)]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The head of the hippocampus is more susceptible both to age-related atrophy and to the degenerative change associated with AD.

    “These data would suggest that the head of the hippocampus is more susceptible both to age related atrophy and also more susceptible to the degenerative change associated with AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Parahippocampal gyrus measurements were not possible in 16 controls and 14 Alzheimer's disease patients.

    “For this reason, PHG measurements were not possible in 16 controls and 14 AD patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The reformatting, realignment and anatomic tracing of the MRI images in every subject were reviewed by a three-member panel blinded to all clinical information.

    “The reformatting and realignment of the MRI images and all anatomic tracing in every subject was reviewed by a three member panel who were likewise blinded to all clinical information, and corrections were made at that time if necessary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The analysis of the association between MTL volume and age is based on a cross-sectional sample, and secular effects of different environmental or socioeconomic conditions experienced by successive age groups may be unrecognized.

    “In analyzing the association between MTL volume and age we recognize that this is a cross-sectional sample and that secular effects of different environmental or socioeconomic conditions experienced by successive age groups may be unrecognized ([4](#R4)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] DeCarli C, Kaye JA, Horwitz B, Rapoport SI. Critical analysis of the use of computer-assisted transverse axial tomography to study human brain in aging and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology. 1990;40:872–883. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.6.872. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.40.6.872)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2189080/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Neurology&title=Critical%20analysis%20of%20the%20use%20of%20computer-assisted%20transverse%20axial%20tomography%20to%20study%20human%20brain%20in%20aging%20and%20dementia%20of%20the%20Alzhei source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These data do not address the issue of optimal aging or the aging process without any co-morbid illnesses.

    “These data do not address the issue of optimal aging or the aging process without any co-morbid illnesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Of the three MTL structures measured, the anatomic boundaries presented by MRI are more precise, and less normal anatomic variability exists, for the hippocampus than for the amygdala or PHG.

    “Of the three MTL structures measured, the anatomic boundaries presented by MRI are more precise, and less normal anatomic variability exits, for the hippocampus than for the amygdala or PHG ([29](#R29)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Jack CR., Jr MRI-based hippocampal volume measurements in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1994;35(Suppl 6):S21–S29. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8206012/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Epilepsia&title=MRI-based%20hippocampal%20volume%20measurements%20in%20epilepsy.&author=CR%20Jack&volume=35&issue=Suppl%206&publication_year=1994&pages=S21-S29&pmid=8206012&doi=10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x&)] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The control and Alzheimer's disease groups were well matched on education and gender distribution, with approximately a 2:1 female to male ratio in both groups.

    “The control and AD patients were well matched on education and gender distribution with approximately a 2:1 female to male ratio in both groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This observation is in agreement with a similar analysis performed on autopsy specimens.

    “This observation is in agreement with a similar analysis that was performed on autopsy specimens ([51](#R51)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Chang F-LF, Parisi JE, Jack CRJ, Petersen RC. Morphometric analysis of the hippocampus in Alzheimer's Disease: Post-mortem MRI and histological correlates. Annals of Neurology. 1992;32:268. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Annals%20of%20Neurology&title=Morphometric%20analysis%20of%20the%20hippocampus%20in%20Alzheimer's%20Disease:%20Post-mortem%20MRI%20and%20histological%20correlates.&author=F-LF%20Chang&author=JE%20Parisi&author=CRJ%20Jack&author=RC%20Petersen&volume=32&publication_year=1992&pages=268&)] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The volumetric MRI data were not used to aid in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

    “The volumetric data were not used to aid in the clinical diagnosis of AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The observation of age-related brain atrophy is consistent with other imaging and autopsy studies.

    “This is consistent with observations of age related brain atrophy in other imaging and autopsy studies ([14](#R14), [41](#R41)-[46](#R46)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] Jack CR, Jr., Petersen RC, O'Brien PC, et al. MR-based hippocampal volumetry in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1992;42:183–188. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.1.183. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.1.183)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1734300/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Neurology&title=MR-based%20hippocampal%20volumetry%20in%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20Alzheimer's%20disease.&author=CR%20Jack&author=RC%20Petersen&author=PC%20O'Brien&volume=42&publication_year=1992&pages=183-188&pmid=1734300&doi=10.1212/wnl.42.1.183&)] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41]-[46]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While the associations reported should be generalizable, the specific numeric values may vary among different sites.

    “Therefore while the associations reported should be generalizable, the specific numeric values may vary among different sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The absolute numeric output of any image-based volume measurement technique is methodology-dependent.

    “One caveat however is that the absolute numeric output of any image based volume measurement technique is methodology-dependent([29](#R29)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Jack CR., Jr MRI-based hippocampal volume measurements in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1994;35(Suppl 6):S21–S29. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8206012/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Epilepsia&title=MRI-based%20hippocampal%20volume%20measurements%20in%20epilepsy.&author=CR%20Jack&volume=35&issue=Suppl%206&publication_year=1994&pages=S21-S29&pmid=8206012&doi=10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x&)] source

      Not checked in the free run.

34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cross-sectional decline in medial temporal lobe volumes with age observed in controls reflects the effect of normal aging rather than cohort or other differences.

    “Normalized MTL volumes declined with age in a linear fashion([Table 2](#T2), [Figure 2](#F2)).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The clinically characterized control subjects are free of Alzheimer's disease-related medial temporal lobe pathology.

    “The criteria for cognitively normal controls were 1) no active neurological or psychiatric disorders, and 2) like the cases, some had ongoing medical problems, however the illnesses or their treatments did not interfere with cognitive function.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Very mild AD patients present significant diagnostic difficulties for clinicians.

    “These patients present significant diagnostic difficulties for the clinician and constitute an area where a structural imaging test may be particularly useful.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The control population in this study is typical of that which a clinician faces in daily practice.

    “Yet, this control population is typical of that which a clinician faces in daily practice.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The very mild AD subjects (CDR=0.5) qualify for the diagnosis of probable AD by clinical research criteria yet exhibit only the minimal symptoms necessary for this diagnostic classification.

    “The very mild AD subjects (CDR=0.5) qualify for the diagnosis of probable AD by clinical research criteria yet exhibit only the minimal symptoms necessary for this diagnostic classification.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced volume of the hippocampus was frequently positioned immediately following entorhinal cortex volume reductions, which is consistent with it being recognised as one of the preliminary sites of grey matter volumetric decline in Alzheimer's disease.

    “Furthermore, reduced volume of the hippocampus was frequently positioned immediately following entorhinal cortex volume reductions, which is consistent with it being recognised as one of the preliminary sites of grey matter volumetric decline in AD (Jack Jr. et al 1997).”

    From White matter microstructural abnormality precedes cortical volumetric decline in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from data-driven disease progression modelling (2022) · cites this paper as Jack Jr. et al 1997

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neurodegeneration is the major driver of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease.

    “Neurodegeneration, which encompasses brain structural damage at the micro-and macroscopic scale, occurs in both white and grey matter, and is the major driver of cognitive decline in AD (Englund 1998, Jack Jr. et al 1997, Frisoni et al 2002, McDonald et al 2012).”

    From White matter microstructural abnormality precedes cortical volumetric decline in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from data-driven disease progression modelling (2022) · cites this paper as Jack Jr. et al 1997

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links greater hippocampal atrophy with more severe memory impairment in AD, describing hippocampal volume as a marker of its degenerative neuroanatomic substrate. It does not establish that neurodegeneration is the major driver of cognitive decline across AD, or assess that causal claim against other contributors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Structural MRI has established itself as a reliable biomarker in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

    “Structural MRI has already established itself as a reliable biomarker in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (Dubois et al., 2007, Frisoni et al., 2010, Jack et al., 1997); characteristic grey matter reduction and ventricular enlargement can be visualised using standard T1-weighted sequences.”

    From In vivo imaging of tau pathology using multi-parametric quantitative MRI (2015) · cites this paper as Jack et al., 1997

    The Results report that hippocampal volume measurements distinguished patients with Alzheimer’s disease from controls, and the Discussion calls them a sensitive marker in very mild disease (pages not provided). But the Discussion describes the measurement as a potentially helpful adjunct to clinical diagnosis, not structural MRI generally as an already established, reliable clinical biomarker. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI is considered an early and sensitive marker for AD, and is assumed to reflect underlying neuronal loss in hippocampus and temporal lobe.

    “Medial temporal lobe (MTA) atrophy as observed on MRI is considered to be an early and sensitive marker for AD, and is assumed that it reflects underlying neuronal loss in hippocampus and temporal lobe (Clerx et al., 2013; Jack et al., 1997; Duara et al., 2008).”

    From T1rho MRI and CSF biomarkers in diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (2015) · cites this paper as Jack et al., 1997

    The Abstract describes MRI-based hippocampal volume as a sensitive marker of medial temporal neuroanatomic degeneration early in AD, and the Discussion reports that it distinguishes very mild AD from elderly controls. The paper does not establish the more specific assumption that the MRI atrophy reflects neuronal loss in the hippocampus and temporal lobe. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In noncarriers, hippocampal volumes decreased with age.

    “As expected, there was an age-dependent decrease in hippocampal volumes in noncarriers (Fig. 1D).22”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Moderate-AD PHG score does not support the stated significance

    Major

    The moderate-AD PHG mean is −0.512 with SD 1.344 and at most 15 patients. Even using all 15, a test against zero gives t≈1.48 and p≈0.16, not P<.001. Fewer PHG measurements would not resolve the discrepancy.

1 of 1

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 1,128

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1212/WNL.42.1.1 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Jack, C. R., Petersen, R. C., Xu, Y. C., Waring, S. C., O'Brien, P. C., Tangalos, E. G., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., & Kokmen, E.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (Drs. Jack and Xu), Neurology(Drs. Petersen and Kokmen), Health Sciences Research (Drs. Waring, O'Brien, and Petersen), Internal Medicine (Dr. Tangalos), Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (Drs. Smith and Ivnik), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1997-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
786-794
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2063136428
Cited by
1,128
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 53
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-08031, P30AG008031, AG-06786, U01AG006786, R01AG011378, AG-11378, R37AG011378)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, medial temporal lobe atrophy, hippocampal volume, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, normal aging, volumetric MRI, Clinical Dementia Rating, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Amygdala, Atrophy, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review