The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Leptomeningeal metastasis: A comparison of gadolinium‐enhanced MR and contrast‐enhanced CT of the brain
Abstract
We evaluated 14 consecutive patients with leptomeningeal metastasis prospectively, using both T1-weighted (T1W) gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR (Gd-MR) and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT). Thirteen had positive CSF cytology; the remaining patient had an atypical CSF lymphocytosis and primary CNS lymphoma. The patients (8M/6F) ranged in age from 8 to 70 years (median, 42 years). Tumor histology included 3 systemic and 2 primary CNS lymphomas, 3 breast carcinomas, 2 leukemias, 1 malignant schwannoma, 1 small cell lung cancer, 1 prostate cancer, and 1 melanoma. Both imaging methods demonstrated parenchymal volume loss equally well in all patients. Gd-MR revealed abnormal enhancement of meninges or parenchyma in 10 patients, including all 5 patients with positive CE-CT. Neither technique revealed any foci of abnormal enhancement in 4 patients. Gd-MR was superior to CE-CT in demonstrating and quantifying enhancing subarachnoid and parenchymal nodules in 6 patients and in demonstrating sulcal, dural, cisternal, tentorial, and ependymal enhancement. Our findings indicate that T1W Gd-MR is the preferred imaging modality in leptomeningeal metastasis and suggest that CE-CT is unnecessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Novello, S., Barlesi, F., Califano, R., Cufer, T., Ekman, S., Levra, M. G., Kerr, K., Popat, S., Reck, M., Senan, S., et al. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw326 · Cited by 2,631
Planchard, D., Popat, S., Kerr, K., Novello, S., Smit, E. F., Faivre-Finn, C., Mok, T. S., Reck, M., Van Schil, P. E., Hellmann, M. D., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy275 · Cited by 2,274
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer
Franzoi, M. A., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.020 · Cited by 149
Bench-to-bedside imaging in brain metastases: a road to precision oncology
Shukla, S., Karbhari, A., Rastogi, S., Agarwal, U., Rai, P., & Mahajan, A. (2024) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.015 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Chamberlain, M. C., Sandy, A. D., & Press, G. A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3_part_1
- Pages
- 435-435
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2037422190
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.