The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction
Abstract
Previous frequency estimates of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis have ranged from 54 to 65 percent. These studies may overestimate the frequency in the general MS population, since the patients in these studies were recruited from clinic populations. In the present study, we administered a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to 100 community-based MS patients and 100 demographically matched healthy controls. Of 31 cognitive test indices examined, 48 MS patients and five controls were impaired on four or more test indices, yielding an overall frequency rate of 43% for the MS group. The pattern of cognitive decline was not uniform: MS patients were more frequently impaired on measures of recent memory, sustained attention, verbal fluency, conceptual reasoning, and visuospatial perception, and less frequently impaired on measures of language and immediate and remote memory. We developed a brief (20-minute) screening battery empirically by selecting the four most sensitive test indices from the comprehensive battery. The brief battery yielded a sensitivity value of 71% and a specificity value of 94% in discriminating cognitively intact from impaired MS patients, as defined by the comprehensive battery. Cognitive impairment was not significantly associated with illness duration, depression, disease course, or medication usage, but was significantly (albeit weakly) correlated with physical disability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis
Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70259-x · Cited by 2,088
Multiple Sclerosis: An Immune or Neurodegenerative Disorder?
Trapp, B. D., & Nave, K.-A. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313 · Cited by 1,724
Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review
McGinley, M. P., Goldschmidt, C. H., & Rae-Grant, A. D. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.26858 · Cited by 1,205
A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis
Vickrey, B. G., Hays, R. D., Harooni, R., Myers, L. W., & Ellison, G. W. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf02260859 · Cited by 1,132
White Matter Changes in Schizophrenia: Evidence for Myelin-Related Dysfunction
Davis, K. L., Stewart, D. G., Friedman, J. I., Buchsbaum, M., Harvey, P. D., Hof, P. R., Buxbaum, J., & Haroutunian, V. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.443 · Cited by 793
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 685-691
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2060129459
- Cited by
- 2,110
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.41.5.685
- The paper
- Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.41.5.685
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.