Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shunting normal‐pressure hydrocephalus: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?: A multicenter study and literature review

Vanneste, J., Augustijn, P., Dirven, C., Tan, W. F., Goedhart, Z. D.·1992·Neurology

Abstract

We performed a multicenter retrospective study in 166 consecutive patients shunted for presumed normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) in the four neurosurgical departments of Amsterdam. Overall improvement occurred in 36%, substantial improvement in 21%. In the subgroup of idiopathic NPH (N = 127), marked improvement was only 15%. The incidence of shunt-responsive NPH in our area was 2.2/million/year. The rate of severe and moderate shunt-related complications was 28%, leading to death or severe residual morbidity in 7%. The substantial benefit/serious harm ration in the whole group was only three (21%/7%), decreasing to 1.7 in idiopathic NPH. By excluding patients at high surgical risk, this ratio might have risen to 10 in the whole group and to six in idiopathic NPH. Our experience is much less favorable than that encountered in the literature, reporting overall improvement in 74% and marked improvement in 55% of the shunted patients. We conclude that NPH is probably a very rare and still overdiagnosed syndrome and that the overall morbidity rate for each patient demonstrating meaningful improvement is high.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.42.1.54

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Vanneste, J., Augustijn, P., Dirven, C., Tan, W. F., & Goedhart, Z. D.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1992-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
54-54
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2150652709
Cited by
285
References
0
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shunting normal‐pressure hydrocephalus: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?: A multicenter study and literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.42.1.54
The paper
Vanneste, J., Augustijn, P., Dirven, C., Tan, W. F., & Goedhart, Z. D. (1992). Shunting normal‐pressure hydrocephalus: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?: A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.1.54

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.