The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Surgical Management in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A 6-Year Review of 214 Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience of managing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) during the 6-year period from 2002 to 2007, when intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was part of the diagnostic workup. METHODS: The review includes all iNPH patients undergoing diagnostic ICP monitoring during the years 2002 to 2007. Clinical grading was done prospectively using a normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) grading scale (scores from 3 to 15). The selection of patients for surgery was based on clinical symptoms, enlarged cerebral ventricles, and findings on ICP monitoring. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range, 0.3-6 years). Both static ICP and pulsatile ICP were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients underwent the diagnostic workup, of whom 131 went on to surgery. Although 1 patient died shortly after treatment, 103 of the 130 patients (79%) improved clinically. This improvement lasted throughout the observation period. The static ICP observed during ICP monitoring was a poor predictor of the response to surgery. In contrast, among 109 of 130 patients with increased ICP pulsatility (ie, ICP wave amplitude >4 mm Hg on average and >5 mm Hg in >10% of recording time), 101 (93%) were responders (ie, increase in the NPH score of >2). Correspondingly, only 2 of 21 (10%) without increased ICP pulsatility were responders. Superficial wound infection was the only complication of ICP monitoring and occurred in 4 (2%) patients. CONCLUSION: Surgical results in iNPH were good with almost 80% of patients improving after treatment. The data indicate that improvement after surgery can be anticipated in 9 of 10 iNPH patients with abnormal ICP pulsatility, but in only 1 of 10 with normal ICP pulsatility. Diagnostic ICP monitoring had a low complication rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Surgical Risk as Related to Time of Intervention in the Repair of Intracranial Aneurysms
Hunt, W. E., & Hess, R. M. (1968) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003416197-10 · Cited by 3,371
Diagnosing Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus
Relkin, N., Marmarou, A., Klinge, P., Bergsneider, M., & Black, P. M. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168185.29659.c5 · Cited by 1,224
Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure
Czosnyka, M. (2004) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.033126 · Cited by 794
Teasdale, G. M., Drake, C. G., Hunt, W., Kassell, N., Sano, K., Pertuiset, B., & De Villiers, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1457 · Cited by 741
Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system
Marmarou, A., Shulman, K., & LaMorgese, J. (1975) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1975.43.5.0523 · Cited by 725
Marmarou, A., Bergsneider, M., Klinge, P., Relkin, N., & Black, P. M. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168184.01002.60 · Cited by 469
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review of Diagnosis and Outcome
Hebb, A. O., & Cusimano, M. D. (2001) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200111000-00028 · Cited by 462
Cerebral vasomotor paralysis produced by intracranial hypertension
Langfitt, T. W., Weinstein, J. D., & Kassell, N. F. (1965) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.15.7.622 · Cited by 409
Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy
Greitz, D. (2004) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-004-0326-9 · Cited by 393
Marmarou, A., Young, H. F., Aygok, G. A., Sawauchi, S., Tsuji, O., Yamamoto, T., & Dunbar, J. (2005) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.0987 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Glymphatic MRI in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Ringstad, G., Vatnehol, S. A. S., & Eide, P. K. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx191 · Cited by 722
Self-citationGuidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Second Edition
MORI, E., ISHIKAWA, M., KATO, T., KAZUI, H., MIYAKE, H., MIYAJIMA, M., NAKAJIMA, M., HASHIMOTO, M., KURIYAMA, N., TOKUDA, T., et al. (2012) · Neurologia medico-chirurgica · doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775 · Cited by 666
Brain-wide glymphatic enhancement and clearance in humans assessed with MRI.
Ringstad, G., Valnes, L. M., Dale, A. M., Pripp, A. H., Vatnehol, S.-A. S., Emblem, K. E., Mardal, K.-A., & Eide, P. K. (2018) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.121537 · Cited by 533
“Within the Department of Neurosurgery, a clinical assessment was done, and clinical severity was graded based on a previously described NPH grading scale (77, 78).”
Self-citationThe pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility
Wagshul, M. E., Eide, P. K., & Madsen, J. R. (2011) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-8-5 · Cited by 473
Self-citationEide, P. K., & Hansson, H. ‐. (2018) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12420 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eide, P. K., & Sorteberg, W.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-91
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974873409
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Surgical Management in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A 6-Year Review of 214 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000363408.69856.b8
- The paper
- Eide, P. K., & Sorteberg, W. (2010). Diagnostic Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Surgical Management in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A 6-Year Review of 214 Patients. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000363408.69856.b8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.