The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selegiline as initial treatment in de novo parkinsonian patients
Abstract
To investigate the efficacy and safety of selegiline in the early phase of Parkinson's disease (PD), we carried out a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel trial. De novo PD patients were randomized to receive either selegiline (10 mg/d) or matching placebo. We continued selegiline or placebo until levodopa therapy became necessary and assessed the disability using three different rating scales at baseline, after 3 weeks, at 2, 4, 8, and 12 months, and at every 4 months thereafter. Fifty-two patients were eligible for the analysis, 27 in the selegiline group and 25 in the placebo group. The median duration of time before levodopa had to be initiated was 545 +/- 90 days with selegiline and 372 +/- 28 days with placebo (p = 0.03). Disability was significantly less in the selegiline group than in the placebo group up to 12 months. The period of time during which the mean total Columbia University Rating Scale score stayed below the baseline was used to express the initial symptomatic effect of the treatments. The difference in this initial improvement time between the two groups was about 3 months and did not alone explain the difference in the delay of the need to start levodopa therapy. Selegiline was well tolerated and there were no severe side effects. We conclude that selegiline delays the need to start levodopa in de novo PD patients, has symptomatic efficacy, and possibly retards the progression of the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The oxidant stress hypothesis in Parkinson's disease: Evidence supporting it
Fahn, S., & Cohen, G. (1992) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410320616 · Cited by 927
Inhibitors of MAO-A and MAO-B in Psychiatry and Neurology
Finberg, J. P. M., & Rabey, J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00340 · Cited by 432
Reduced intravenous glutathione in the treatment of early parkinson's disease
Sechi, G., Deledda, M. G., Bua, G., Satta, W. M., Deiana, G. A., Pes, G. M., & Rosati, G. (1996) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0278-5846(96)00103-0 · Cited by 173
Shimazu, S., & Miklya, I. (2004) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.11.016 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Myllylä, V. V., Sotaniemi, K. A., Vuorinen, J. A., & Heinonen, E. H.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 339-339
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2053085095
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selegiline as initial treatment in de novo parkinsonian patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.42.2.339
- The paper
- Myllylä, V. V., Sotaniemi, K. A., Vuorinen, J. A., & Heinonen, E. H. (1992). Selegiline as initial treatment in de novo parkinsonian patients. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.2.339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.