The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of dementia after stroke in a hospitalized cohort: Results of a longitudinal study
Abstract
Stroke is considered the second most common cause of dementia, but the magnitude of the risk posed by stroke has not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term risk of developing dementia after stroke onset in a hospitalized cohort. We prospectively examined 185 nondemented patients aged > or = 60 years hospitalized with ischemic stroke and 241 age-matched nondemented controls without stroke from the same community using neurologic, neuropsychological, and functional assessments given annually. Using criteria modified from the DSM-III-R, we diagnosed incident dementia based on the annual examination findings. We used life-table methods to estimate incidence in the two groups, Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the proportion surviving without dementia, and Cox proportional-hazards analysis to compute the relative risk (RR) of dementia after 1 to 4 years of follow-up. The incidence of dementia was 8.4 per 100 person-years in the stroke group and 1.3 per 100 person-years in the control group. After 52 months of follow-up, the cumulative proportion (+/- SE) surviving without dementia was 66.3 +/- 5.5% for stroke and 90.3 +/- 4.3% for control subjects. The RR of dementia associated with stroke compared with controls was 5.5 (95% CI, 2.5 to 11.1) after adjusting for demographic factors. Older age at stroke onset and fewer years of education were significant covariates, but sex and race were not. A low score on the Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline was a significant predictor when added to this model.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pendlebury, S. T., & Rothwell, P. M. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70236-4 · Cited by 1,853
The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review
Hajat, C., & Stein, E. (2018) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008 · Cited by 959
Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive decline in middle-aged adults
Knopman, D., Boland, L. L., Mosley, T., Howard, G., Liao, D., Szklo, M., McGovern, P., & Folsom, A. R. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.1.42 · Cited by 883
Is Alzheimer's disease a neurodegenerative or a vascular disorder? Data, dogma, and dialectics
de la Torre, J. C. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00683-0 · Cited by 834
Aggregation of vascular risk factors and risk of incident Alzheimer disease
Luchsinger, J. A., Reitz, C., Honig, L. S., Tang, M. X., Shea, S., & Mayeux, R. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000172914.08967.dc · Cited by 790
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tatemichi, T. K., Paik, M., Bagiella, E., Desmond, D. W., Stern, Y., Sano, M., Hauser, W. A., & Mayeux, R.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1885-1885
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1986477668
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of dementia after stroke in a hospitalized cohort: Results of a longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.44.10.1885
- The paper
- Tatemichi, T. K., Paik, M., Bagiella, E., Desmond, D. W., Stern, Y., Sano, M., Hauser, W. A., & Mayeux, R. (1994). Risk of dementia after stroke in a hospitalized cohort: Results of a longitudinal study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.44.10.1885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.