The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patient awareness of seizures
Abstract
In 31 consecutive patients who were admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit, we prospectively determined whether the patients were aware of having seizures. On admission, all patients stated that they knew of at least some of their seizures. Eight of 23 with classifiable epileptic seizures recognized that they were occasionally unaware of their seizures. During telemetry, following full recovery of consciousness after each seizure, we asked the patients whether they had recently had a seizure. For control purposes, we asked the patients the same question at random times. Among patients with seizures, there were no false-positive answers. Only 6 of 23 (26%) of the patients with epilepsy were always aware of their seizures, including complex partial and secondarily generalized events, and 7 of 23 (30%) were never aware of any seizures. Self-reporting of seizures was unreliable: Patients reporting the lowest baseline frequency of seizures had the highest fraction of unrecognized seizures. Seizure awareness was lowest for patients with temporal lobe foci, especially on the left side. Patients with primarily generalized epilepsy were more likely to be aware of tonic-clonic seizures than were patients with secondarily generalized partial seizures. All four patients with nonepileptic attacks believed that they always knew of their seizures, but only three of the four patients actually did always know. Unrecognized seizures are frequent and should be considered in patient management and in studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epilepsy: Accuracy of Patient Seizure Counts
Hoppe, C., Poepel, A., & Elger, C. E. (2007) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.64.11.1595 · Cited by 485
Seizure detection, seizure prediction, and closed-loop warning systems in epilepsy
Ramgopal, S., Thome-Souza, S., Jackson, M., Kadish, N. E., Sánchez Fernández, I., Klehm, J., Bosl, W., Reinsberger, C., Schachter, S., & Loddenkemper, T. (2014) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.06.023 · Cited by 469
Seizures and Epilepsy After Ischemic Stroke
Camilo, O., & Goldstein, L. B. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000130989.17100.96 · Cited by 429
Diagnostic challenges in epilepsy: seizure under-reporting and seizure detection
Elger, C. E., & Hoppe, C. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30038-3 · Cited by 403
Automated seizure detection systems and their effectiveness for each type of seizure
Ulate-Campos, A., Coughlin, F., Gaínza-Lein, M., Fernández, I. S., Pearl, P. L., & Loddenkemper, T. (2016) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.008 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Blum, D. E., Eskola, J., Bortz, J. J., & Fisher, R. S.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 260-264
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2052048899
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient awareness of seizures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.47.1.260
- The paper
- Blum, D. E., Eskola, J., Bortz, J. J., & Fisher, R. S. (1996). Patient awareness of seizures. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.47.1.260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.