The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential changes in neurochemical markers of striatal dopamine nerve terminals in idiopathic Parkinson's disease
Abstract
To determine the extent that different dopamine (DA) neuronal markers provide similar estimates of striatal (caudate and putamen) DA nerve terminal loss in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), we compared, in postmortem striatum of 12 patients with PD and 10 matched controls, levels of five different DA neuronal markers. These markers included DA itself, three different estimates of the density of the DA transporter (DAT) ([3H])GBR 12,935 and [3H]WIN 35,428 binding; DAT protein immunoreactivity), and one estimate of the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2; [3H]DTBZ binding). Striatal levels of all examined DA markers in PD were significantly intercorrelated. However, the magnitude of loss relative to controls was unequal (DAT protein = DA > [3H]WIN 35,428 > [3H]DTBZ > [3H]GBR 12, 935), with the differences more marked in the severely affected putamen. The less severe reduction of binding of the DAT/VMAT2 radioligands relative to DA and DAT protein could be explained by differential regulation/degeneration of different DA nerve terminal components or lack of specificity of the radioligands for the DA neuron. These postmortem data may help in interpretation of in vivo neuroimaging studies in PD in which only one radioligand is routinely employed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Striatal dopamine nerve terminal markers in human, chronic methamphetamine users
Wilson, J. M., Kalasinsky, K. S., Levey, A. I., Bergeron, C., Reiber, G., Anthony, R. M., Schmunk, G. A., Shannak, K., Haycock, J. W., & Kish, S. J. (1996) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0696-699 · Cited by 718
Self-citationMcCann, U. D., Wong, D. F., Yokoi, F., Villemagne, V., Dannals, R. F., & Ricaurte, G. A. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08417.1998 · Cited by 602
“…for detecting severe DA cell loss, such as in PD (Hornykiewicz, 1966; Tedroff et al., 1988; Wilson et al., 1996b), they appear to be less sensitive for detecting milder degrees of nigrostriatal DA injury, such as that in olivopontocerebellar atrophy (Zhong et al., 1995; Wilson et al., 1996b).”
BackgroundTillerson, J. L., Caudle, W. M., Reverón, M. E., & Miller, G. W. (2003) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00096-4 · Cited by 399
Implications of Chronic Methamphetamine Use: A Literature Review
Meredith, C. W., Jaffe, C., Ang-Lee, K., & Saxon, A. J. (2005) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/10673220591003605 · Cited by 393
The serotonergic system in Parkinson's disease
Huot, P., Fox, S. H., & Brotchie, J. M. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.08.004 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, J. M., Levey, A. I., Rajput, A., Ang, L., Guttman, M., Shannak, K., Niznik, H. B., Hornykiewicz, O., Pifl, C., & Kish, S. J.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 718-726
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2084240708
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential changes in neurochemical markers of striatal dopamine nerve terminals in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.47.3.718
- The paper
- Wilson, J. M., Levey, A. I., Rajput, A., Ang, L., Guttman, M., Shannak, K., Niznik, H. B., Hornykiewicz, O., Pifl, C., & Kish, S. J. (1996). Differential changes in neurochemical markers of striatal dopamine nerve terminals in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.47.3.718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.