The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corticobasal degeneration: Neuropathologic and clinical heterogeneity
Abstract
We investigated clinical and neuropathologic heterogeneity and apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype in 11 cases of neuropathologically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Although seven of the 11 patients presented with unilateral limb dysfunction, the remaining four patients had less typical presentations including memory loss, behavioral changes, and difficulties with speech or gait. All 11 patients eventually developed extrapyramidal signs as well as cortical features, most commonly apraxia. At autopsy, the brains of seven of the 11 patients exhibited predominant neuronal loss and gliosis of perirolandic cortex; degeneration of more rostral frontal cortex was observed in three of the four patients with atypical clinical presentations. All cases displayed ballooned neurons, tau-positive neuronal and glial inclusions, threads and grains, and nigral degeneration. Six of the 11 cases manifested overlapping neuropathologic features of one or more disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Parkinson's disease (PD), and hippocampal sclerosis. Interestingly, these six patients all exhibited memory loss early in the course of their illness. The 11 CBD cases exhibited increased frequency (0.32) of the epsilon 4 allele of apoE, relative to control populations; the frequency remained elevated (0.25) even when the three cases with concomitant AD were excluded. Beta-amyloid (A beta) deposition in hippocampus or cortex was present in five of the seven cases with an epsilon 4 genotype. These observations indicate that CBD is a pathologically and clinically heterogeneous disorder with substantial overlap with other neurodegenerative disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration
Armstrong, M. J., Litvan, I., Lang, A. E., Bak, T. H., Bhatia, K. P., Borroni, B., Boxer, A. L., Dickson, D. W., Grossman, M., Hallett, M., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31827f0fd1 · Cited by 1,904
Office of Rare Diseases Neuropathologic Criteria for Corticobasal Degeneration
Dickson, D. W., Bergeron, C., Chin, S. S., Duyckaerts, C., Horoupian, D., Ikeda, K., Jellinger, K., Lantos, P. L., Lippa, C. F., Mirra, S. S., et al. (2002) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/61.11.935 · Cited by 724
Self-citationNeuroinflammation as a common feature of neurodegenerative disorders
Guzman-Martinez, L., Maccioni, R. B., Andrade, V., Navarrete, L. P., Pastor, M. G., & Ramos-Escobar, N. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01008 · Cited by 702
Arendt, T., Stieler, J. T., & Holzer, M. (2016) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.08.018 · Cited by 609
Pathologic heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration
Boeve, B. F., Maraganore, D. M., Parisi, J. E., Ahlskog, J. E., Graff-Radford, N., Caselli, R. J., Dickson, D. W., Kokmen, E., & Petersen, R. C. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.4.795 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, J. A., Watts, R. L., Gearing, M., Brewer, R. P., & Mirra, S. S.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 959-968
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2152506041
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticobasal degeneration: Neuropathologic and clinical heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.48.4.959
- The paper
- Schneider, J. A., Watts, R. L., Gearing, M., Brewer, R. P., & Mirra, S. S. (1997). Corticobasal degeneration: Neuropathologic and clinical heterogeneity. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.4.959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.