The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Central poststroke pain and Wallenberg's lateral medullary infarction: Frequency, character, and determinants in 63 patients
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is an infrequently recognized complication of lateral medullary infarction (LMI). We determined the frequency, nature, and predictors of this complication in 63 patients with LMI. The hypothesis tested was that the degree of clinical sensory loss and extent of infarction seen on MRI, both graded by a predetermined scoring scale, would be predictive of CPSP. We also performed quantitative sensory testing (QST) of thermal and pressure sensation thresholds in a subgroup of 19 patients (nine with CPSP and 10 without) to analyze in detail the spinothalamic and trigeminothalamic systems mediating these modalities from both sides of the face and body. We analyzed these results for specific markers of CPSP. RESULTS: CPSP developed in 25% (16/63) of the patients, all within 6 months. This was constant and severe with frequent allodynia, but responded in all cases to amitriptyline and recurred promptly on attempted weaning. CPSP affected the ipsilateral peri-orbital region most commonly, either alone or in combination with the contralateral limbs. Ipsilateral neurotrophic facial ulceration developed in two cases. CPSP correlated significantly (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0002) with the degree of clinical sensory loss but not with the size of infarction seen on MRI (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.7). QST revealed a highly specific (100%) and sensitive (89%) finding for CPSP-thresholds from the check contralateral to the LMI were normal in eight of nine cases with CPSP and abnormal in all of the 10 cases without CPSP. Abnormalities in the face contralateral to the infarct are referable to the crossed trigeminothalamic tract in the medullary reticular formation medial to the infarcted lateral medulla. We conclude that this argues for the theory that central pain is caused by denervation sensitivity of the "paleo"-reticulothalamic connections due to a selective "neo"-spinothalamic lesion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neurophysiological evaluation of pain
Bromm, B., & Lorenz, J. (1998) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00075-3 · Cited by 410
Spinal cord infarction: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings and short term outcome
Masson, C. (2004) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.031724 · Cited by 284
Willoch, F., Schindler, F., Wester, H. J., Empl, M., Straube, A., Schwaiger, M., Conrad, B., & Tölle, T. R. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.014 · Cited by 239
Acute and Chronic Pain Processing in the Thalamocortical System of Humans and Animal Models
Groh, A., Krieger, P., Mease, R. A., & Henderson, L. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.042 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- MacGowan, D. J. L., Janal, M. N., Clark, W. C., Wharton, R. N., Lazar, R. M., Sacco, R. L., & Mohr, J. P.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-125
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2034378273
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central poststroke pain and Wallenberg's lateral medullary infarction: Frequency, character, and determinants in 63 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.49.1.120
- The paper
- MacGowan, D. J. L., Janal, M. N., Clark, W. C., Wharton, R. N., Lazar, R. M., Sacco, R. L., & Mohr, J. P. (1997). Central poststroke pain and Wallenberg's lateral medullary infarction: Frequency, character, and determinants in 63 patients. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.49.1.120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.