The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease
Abstract
Pramipexole is a new, selective, nonergoline dopamine agonist that acts on D2 and preferentially on D3 dopamine receptors. Phase II and III clinical trials have shown this drug to be useful in treating both early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in patients with advanced PD with motor fluctuations. A bromocriptine treatment group was included to enable comparisons between bromocriptine and placebo groups, but the study was not powered to show statistical differences between the active treatment groups. The study included 247 patients with "wearing off." Patients were Hoehn and Yahr stages II to IV during "on" times. The trial included three phases: dose escalation, 6 months' maintenance, and dose reduction. The primary end points were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts II and III. Up to 4.5 mg per day of pramipexole and 30 mg per day of bromocriptine were used. The results of the study showed that the UPDRS part II improved by 26.7% for pramipexole (p = 0.0002) and 14% for bromocriptine (p = 0.02) versus 4.8% for placebo. The UPDRS part III showed improvements of 34% for pramipexole (p = 0.0006) and 23.8% for bromocriptine (p = 0.01) versus 5.7% for placebo. There were no major differences in safety data. In the active treatment groups there were more reports of dyskinesia and nausea compared with placebo. In regard to comparison of the Global Clinical Assessment of Efficacy between active treatment groups, there was a trend to significance (p = 0.056) in favor of pramipexole. We conclude that pramipexole-treated patients with advanced PD improved significantly more than placebo for both primary end points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pahwa, R., Factor, S. A., Lyons, K. E., Ondo, W. G., Gronseth, G., Bronte-Stewart, H., Hallett, M., Miyasaki, J., Stevens, J., & Weiner, W. J. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000215250.82576.87 · Cited by 499
The Clinically Important Difference on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Shulman, L. M., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Anderson, K. E., Fishman, P. S., Reich, S. G., & Weiner, W. J. (2010) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.295 · Cited by 494
Limitations of current Parkinson's disease therapy
Rascol, O., Payoux, P., Ory, F., Ferreira, J. J., Brefel-Courbon, C., & Montastruc, J.-L. (2003) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10513 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Guttman, M., & International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1060-1065
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2028094886
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.49.4.1060
- The paper
- Guttman, M., & International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group. (1997). Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.49.4.1060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.