The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decreased cerebellar posterior vermis size in fragile X syndrome: Correlation with neurocognitive performance
Abstract
We examined whether posterior vermis size is smaller in individuals with fragile X syndrome (fra X) than in control subjects and whether this decreased size is associated with cognitive performance. Cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions have been identified in fra X; however, underlying neuropathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. MRI was used to investigate the posterior fossa in 32 males with fra X, 28 males with other causes of cognitive disability (CD), and 38 males with normal development (ND) as well as and in 37 females with fra X and 53 female control subjects. Among females with fra X, neurocognitive correlates of posterior vermis size were examined. Posterior vermis size (cross-sectional area) in males with fra X was significantly smaller compared with CD and ND groups, particularly when corrected for intracranial area. Posterior vermis size corrected for intracranial area was significantly smaller in females with fra X compared with control subjects. Compared with males with fra X and non-fra X control subjects, posterior vermis size in females with fra X was intermediate. After statistically removing the effect of mean parental IQ, posterior vermis size predicted a significant proportion of the variance (10 to 23%) of performance on full-scale, verbal, and performance IQ; block design; categories achieved on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; and the Rey inventory score. The size of the posterior vermis is significantly decreased in fra X, more so in males than in females. In females with fra X, posterior vermis size predicts performance on selected cognitive measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function
Middleton, F. A., & Strick, P. L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7939688 · Cited by 1,356
Assessment [RETIRED]: Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
(1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.1.1 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Hagerman, R. J., Berry-Kravis, E., Hazlett, H. C., Bailey, D. B., Moine, H., Kooy, R. F., Tassone, F., Gantois, I., Sonenberg, N., Mandel, J. L., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.65 · Cited by 838
Dendritic Spine Structural Anomalies in Fragile-X Mental Retardation Syndrome
Irwin, S. A. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.10.1038 · Cited by 626
CpG and non-CpG methylation in epigenetic gene regulation and brain function
Jang, H., Shin, W., Lee, J., & Do, J. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8060148 · Cited by 427
Evaluation of Cerebellar Size in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Mostofsky, S. H., Reiss, A. L., Lockhart, P., & Denckla, M. B. (1998) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/088307389801300904 · Cited by 311
Self-citationFragile X: Leading the Way for Targeted Treatments in Autism
Wang, L. W., Berry-Kravis, E., & Hagerman, R. J. (2010) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.005 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Mostofsky, S. H., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Aakalu, G., Warsofsky, I. S., Denckla, M. B., & Reiss, A. L.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-130
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2046162980
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decreased cerebellar posterior vermis size in fragile X syndrome: Correlation with neurocognitive performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.50.1.121
- The paper
- Mostofsky, S. H., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Aakalu, G., Warsofsky, I. S., Denckla, M. B., & Reiss, A. L. (1998). Decreased cerebellar posterior vermis size in fragile X syndrome: Correlation with neurocognitive performance. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.50.1.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.