The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized double‐blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis
Abstract
We compared prednisolone (PRED) and azathioprine (AZA) versus prednisolone alone in the treatment of MG. Prednisolone alone or combined with azathioprine is widely used in the treatment of MG, but no randomized placebo-controlled comparative trial data are available. The prednisolone dose and clinical outcome were compared in a multicenter randomized double-blind study of 34 MG patients who were followed up for 3 years. One group (PRED + AZA) received prednisolone (on alternate days) plus azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg); the other group received prednisolone on alternate days plus placebo (PRED + PLAC). Initial high-dose prednisolone (1.5 mg/kg on alternate days) was tapered at remission to the minimal dose required to maintain remission. The prednisolone dose did not differ significantly between the two groups at 1 year (median values: PRED + AZA, 37.5 mg on alternate days; PRED + PLAC, 45 mg on alternate days) but was reduced at 2 and 3 years in the PRED + AZA group (median value at 3 years: PRED + AZA, 0 mg on alternate days; PRED + PLAC, 40 mg on alternate days; p=0.02). Relapses and failures to remit over the 3 years were more frequent in the PRED + PLAC group. There was a sharp rise in the anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) titers in the PRED + PLAC group at 2 years. Incidence of side effects was slightly less in the PRED + AZA group. Azathioprine as an adjunct to alternate day prednisolone in the treatment of antibody-positive generalized MG reduces the maintenance dose of prednisolone and is associated with fewer treatment failures, longer remissions, and fewer side effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gilhus, N. E. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1602678 · Cited by 1,048
Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity
Meriggioli, M. N., & Sanders, D. B. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70063-8 · Cited by 894
Paraneoplastic Syndromes: An Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment
Pelosof, L. C., & Gerber, D. E. (2010) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0099 · Cited by 773
A phase I/IItrial of MYO‐029 in adult subjects with muscular dystrophy
Wagner, K. R., Fleckenstein, J. L., Amato, A. A., Barohn, R. J., Bushby, K., Escolar, D. M., Flanigan, K. M., Pestronk, A., Tawil, R., Wolfe, G. I., et al. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21338 · Cited by 481
Vincent, A., Palace, J., & Hilton-Jones, D. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05186-2 · Cited by 452
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Palace, J., Newsom-Davis, J., Lecky, B., & Myasthenia Gravis Study Group
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1778-1783
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2167873595
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized double‐blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.50.6.1778
- The paper
- Palace, J., Newsom-Davis, J., Lecky, B., & Myasthenia Gravis Study Group. (1998). A randomized double‐blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.50.6.1778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.