The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anatomy of Spatial Attention: Insights from Perfusion Imaging and Hemispatial Neglect in Acute Stroke
Open accessAbstract
The site of lesion responsible for left hemispatial neglect after stroke has been intensely debated recently. Some studies provide evidence that right angular lesions are most likely to cause left neglect, whereas others indicate that right superior temporal lesions are most likely to cause neglect. We examine two potential accounts of the conflicting results: (1) neglect could result from cortical dysfunction beyond the structural lesion in some studies; and (2) different forms of neglect with separate neural correlates have been included in different proportions in separate studies. To evaluate these proposals, we studied 50 patients with acute right subcortical infarcts using tests of hemispatial neglect and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted imaging performed within 48 h of onset of symptoms. Left “allocentric” neglect (errors on the left sides of individual stimuli, regardless of location with respect to the viewer) was most strongly associated with hypoperfusion of right superior temporal gyrus (Fisher's exact test; p < 0.0001), whereas left “egocentric” neglect (errors on the left of the viewer) was most strongly associated with hypoperfusion of the right angular gyrus ( p < 0.0001). Patients without cortical hypoperfusion showed no hemispatial neglect. Because the patients did not have cortical infarcts, our data show that neglect can be caused by hypoperfused dysfunctional tissue not detectable by structural magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, different forms of neglect were associated with different sites of cortical hypoperfusion. Results help explain conflicting results in the literature and contribute to the understanding of spatial attention and representation in the human brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berti, A. (1992) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(92)90076-x · Cited by 4,162
Perisylvian language networks of the human brain
Catani, M., Jones, D. K., & ffytche, D. H. (2005) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20319 · Cited by 1,832
Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque.
Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E., & Bender, D. B. (1972) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1972.35.1.96 · Cited by 1,483
Heilman, K. M., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R. T. (2000) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-2000-13179 · Cited by 1,438
Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque
Desimone, R., Albright, T., Gross, C., & Bruce, C. (1984) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.04-08-02051.1984 · Cited by 1,423
Intentional Maps in Posterior Parietal Cortex
Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142922 · Cited by 1,294 · cited 2×
“Some neurons have response fields that are defined by both eye - and limb - centered representations or eye - and head - centered representations , indicating that they encode spatial location in both coordinate frames ( Andersen and Buneo , 2002 , 2003 ) .”
BackgroundA simple test of visual neglect
Albert, M. L. (1973) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.23.6.658 · Cited by 1,279
Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque.
Bruce, C., Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1981) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1981.46.2.369 · Cited by 1,227
Mesulam, M.-M. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0482 · Cited by 1,096
Lesion analysis in neuropsychology
Damásio, H., & Damásio, A. R. (1989) · Oxford University Press eBooks · Cited by 896
Cited by
A new neural framework for visuospatial processing
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., & Mishkin, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3008 · Cited by 1,325
Spatial Neglect and Attention Networks
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113731 · Cited by 1,318
Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect
Corbetta, M., Kincade, M. J., Lewis, C., Snyder, A. Z., & Sapir, A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1574 · Cited by 892
Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex
Szczepanski, S. M., Konen, C. S., & Kastner, S. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3862-09.2010 · Cited by 337
Hutchinson, J. B., Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2009) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.919109 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P. B., Herskovits, E. H., & Degaonkar, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3161-3167
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2059768491
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 9.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy of Spatial Attention: Insights from Perfusion Imaging and Hemispatial Neglect in Acute Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4468-04.2005
- The paper
- Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P. B., Herskovits, E. H., & Degaonkar, M. (2005). Anatomy of Spatial Attention: Insights from Perfusion Imaging and Hemispatial Neglect in Acute Stroke. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4468-04.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.