Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer’s cramp

Open access
Siebner, H.R., Tormos, J.M., Baumann, A.O. Ceballos-, Auer, C., Catala, M.D., Conrad, B., Pascual-Leone, A.·1999·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the short-term effects of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex on cortical excitability and handwriting in patients with writer's cramp. BACKGROUND: Cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex is abnormally enhanced in patients with writer's cramp. Therefore, reducing cortical excitability by low-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex might result in beneficial effects on handwriting in writer's cramp. DESIGN/METHODS: We studied the effects of subthreshold 1-Hz rTMS on motor threshold and cortico-cortical excitability using the paired-pulse technique in seven patients and seven controls. In another 16 patients and 11 age-matched controls we evaluated changes in cortical excitability by measuring the stimulus-response curve and the postexcitatory silent period before and after subthreshold 1-Hz rTMS. In addition, we analyzed the handwriting before and 20 minutes after 1-Hz rTMS. RESULTS: In the first experiment, low-frequency rTMS resulted in a normalization of the deficient cortico-cortical inhibition in the patients without affecting motor threshold. In the second experiment, 1-Hz rTMS resulted in a significant prolongation of the postexcitatory silent period without affecting the stimulus-response curve in the patient group. Moreover, the dystonic patients showed a significant reduction of mean writing pressure after subthreshold 1-Hz rTMS that was associated with clear but transient improvement in six patients. CONCLUSIONS: In some patients 1-Hz rTMS can reinforce deficient intracortical inhibition and may improve handwriting temporarily. Our data support the notion that reduced intracortical inhibition plays a part in the pathophysiology of focal dystonia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.52.3.529

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Siebner, H. R., Tormos, J. M., Baumann, A. O. C., Auer, C., Catala, M. D., Conrad, B., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1999-02
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
529-529
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2065371287
Cited by
426
References
1
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer’s cramp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.52.3.529
The paper
Siebner, H. R., Tormos, J. M., Baumann, A. O. C., Auer, C., Catala, M. D., Conrad, B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (1999). Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer’s cramp. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.52.3.529

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.