Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: A 5-year randomized multicenter study

Koller, William C., Hutton, J. Thomas, Tolosa, Eduardo, Capilldeo, Rudy, the Carbidopa/Levodopa Study Group·1999·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare effects of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (CR) carbidopa/levodopa in levodopa-naive PD patients. BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that the long-acting preparation would be associated with fewer long-term complications. METHODS: A total of 618 patients were studied in 36 centers worldwide in a blinded, randomized parallel study. Measures of efficacy and adverse reactions were recorded at 3-month intervals for 5 years. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were evaluated by a patient diary and a physician-recorded questionnaire. The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was used to evaluate quality of life. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients completed the trial. After 5 years, the mean dose of IR was 426 mg/day, and the bioavailable dose of CR was 510 mg/day (mean dose, 736 mg/day). After 5 years, 20.6% of the IR group and 21.8% of the CR group had motor fluctuations or dyskinesia. Sixteen percent of both groups had changes in motor response by the questionnaire's definition. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Disability scores and the motor score of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were highest at baseline, improved with therapy, and thereafter worsened over time to reach baseline scoring at the end of 5 years. The CR group was superior to IR for the Activities of Daily Living subsection of the UPDRS for all 5 years and for emotional reactivity and social isolation on the NHP; however, this may have resulted from higher doses of CR that were used. CONCLUSION: Despite the progressive nature of PD, both the immediate-release and sustained-release carbidopa/levodopa formulations maintained a similar level of control in PD after 5 years compared with baseline. Additionally, the low incidence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia was not significantly different between the treatment groups and may be partly attributed to the relatively low doses of levodopa used throughout the 5-year study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.53.5.1012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Koller, W. C., Hutton, J. T., Tolosa, E., Capilldeo, R., & the Carbidopa/Levodopa Study Group
Venue
Neurology
Published
1999-09
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
1012-1012
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W3027974929
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: A 5-year randomized multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.5.1012
The paper
Koller, W. C., Hutton, J. T., Tolosa, E., Capilldeo, R., & the Carbidopa/Levodopa Study Group. (1999). Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: A 5-year randomized multicenter study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.5.1012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.