The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: A 5-year randomized multicenter study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare effects of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (CR) carbidopa/levodopa in levodopa-naive PD patients. BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that the long-acting preparation would be associated with fewer long-term complications. METHODS: A total of 618 patients were studied in 36 centers worldwide in a blinded, randomized parallel study. Measures of efficacy and adverse reactions were recorded at 3-month intervals for 5 years. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were evaluated by a patient diary and a physician-recorded questionnaire. The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was used to evaluate quality of life. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients completed the trial. After 5 years, the mean dose of IR was 426 mg/day, and the bioavailable dose of CR was 510 mg/day (mean dose, 736 mg/day). After 5 years, 20.6% of the IR group and 21.8% of the CR group had motor fluctuations or dyskinesia. Sixteen percent of both groups had changes in motor response by the questionnaire's definition. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Disability scores and the motor score of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were highest at baseline, improved with therapy, and thereafter worsened over time to reach baseline scoring at the end of 5 years. The CR group was superior to IR for the Activities of Daily Living subsection of the UPDRS for all 5 years and for emotional reactivity and social isolation on the NHP; however, this may have resulted from higher doses of CR that were used. CONCLUSION: Despite the progressive nature of PD, both the immediate-release and sustained-release carbidopa/levodopa formulations maintained a similar level of control in PD after 5 years compared with baseline. Additionally, the low incidence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia was not significantly different between the treatment groups and may be partly attributed to the relatively low doses of levodopa used throughout the 5-year study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ahlskog, J. E., & Muenter, M. D. (2001) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.1090 · Cited by 1,454
Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: Current controversies
Olanow, C. W., Agid, Y., Mizuno, Y., Albanese, A., Bonucelli, U., Damier, P., De Yebenes, J., Gershanik, O., Guttman, M., Grandas, F., et al. (2004) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.20243 · Cited by 370
Levodopa in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Status and Future Developments
Tambasco, N., Romoli, M., & Calabresi, P. (2018) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x15666170510143821 · Cited by 282
Clinicopathological characteristics of freezing of gait in autopsy‐confirmed Parkinson's disease
Virmani, T., Moskowitz, C. B., Vonsattel, J., & Fahn, S. (2015) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26346 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Koller, W. C., Hutton, J. T., Tolosa, E., Capilldeo, R., & the Carbidopa/Levodopa Study Group
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1012-1012
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W3027974929
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: A 5-year randomized multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.5.1012
- The paper
- Koller, W. C., Hutton, J. T., Tolosa, E., Capilldeo, R., & the Carbidopa/Levodopa Study Group. (1999). Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: A 5-year randomized multicenter study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.5.1012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.