The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Total neuropathy score: Validation and reliability study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and reliability of the total neuropathy score (TNS) in normal subjects and in subjects with diabetic polyneuropathy. BACKGROUND: Clinical research in peripheral neuropathy requires validated outcome measures. Multiple outcome measures have been used in clinical trials, including symptom measures, functional scales, quantitative clinical examinations, nerve conduction studies, computerized sensory examinations, and nerve biopsy. Each of these measures has its strengths and weaknesses. In two previous studies of toxic neuropathy from chemotherapeutic agents, the authors used the TNS as the outcome measure. The TNS combines information obtained from grading of symptoms, signs, nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory tests, and provides a single measure to quantify neuropathy. METHODS: The authors measured the inter- and intrarater reliability of the TNS and preformed a cross-sectional validation study of the TNS and its subscales with the Mayo Clinic measures of neuropathy, neuropathy symptom score (NSS), and the neurologic impairment score (NIS) in five healthy control subjects and 30 individuals with varying severities of diabetic polyneuropathy. RESULTS: Inter- and intrarater reliability of the TNS was excellent (0.966 and 0.986 respectively). The cross-sectional validation study showed excellent correlations among all measures of neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The total neuropathy score is a validated measure of peripheral nerve function and could be used as an end point for clinical trials of peripheral neuropathy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management of diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy
Sloan, G., Selvarajah, D., & Tesfaye, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-021-00496-z · Cited by 534
Grisold, W., Cavaletti, G., & Windebank, A. J. (2012) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos203 · Cited by 486
Smoked Medicinal Cannabis for Neuropathic Pain in HIV: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial
Ellis, R. J., Toperoff, W., Vaida, F., van den Brande, G., Gonzales, J., Gouaux, B., Bentley, H., & Atkinson, J. H. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2008.120 · Cited by 461
Challenges of neuropathic pain: focus on diabetic neuropathy
Rosenberger, D. C., Blechschmidt, V., Timmerman, H., Wolff, A., & Treede, R.-D. (2020) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-020-02145-7 · Cited by 325
Cavaletti, G., Cornblath, D. R., Merkies, I. S. J., Postma, T. J., Rossi, E., Frigeni, B., Alberti, P., Bruna, J., Velasco, R., Argyriou, A. A., et al. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds329 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornblath, D. R., Chaudhry, V., Carter, K., Lee, D., Seysedadr, M., Miernicki, M., & Joh, T.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1660-1660
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2059786204
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total neuropathy score: Validation and reliability study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1660
- The paper
- Cornblath, D. R., Chaudhry, V., Carter, K., Lee, D., Seysedadr, M., Miernicki, M., & Joh, T. (1999). Total neuropathy score: Validation and reliability study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.