The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Episodic inflammation in the CNS during the early stages of MS results in progressive disability years later, presumably due to myelin and axonal injury. MRI demonstrates ongoing disease activity during the early disease stage, even in some patients who are stable clinically. The optimal MRI measure for the destructive pathologic process is uncertain, however. METHODS: In this post-hoc study, MRI scans were analyzed from patients with relapsing MS participating in a placebo-controlled trial of interferon beta-1a. The brain parenchymal fraction, defined as the ratio of brain parenchymal volume to the total volume within the brain surface contour, was used to measure whole brain atrophy. The relationship between disease features and brain atrophy and effect of interferon beta-1a were determined. RESULTS: MS patients had significant brain atrophy that worsened during each of 2 years of observation. In many patients, brain atrophy worsened without clinical disease activity. Baseline clinical and MRI abnormalities were not strongly related to the rate of brain atrophy during the subsequent 2 years. Treatment with interferon beta-1a resulted in a reduction in brain atrophy progression during the second year of the clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS have measurable amounts of whole brain atrophy that worsens yearly, in most cases without clinical manifestations. The brain parenchymal fraction is a marker for destructive pathologic processes ongoing in relapsing MS patients, and appears useful in demonstrating treatment effects in controlled clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., Peterson, J., Ransohoff, R. M., Rudick, R., Mörk, S., & Bö, L. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801293380502 · Cited by 4,029
Self-citation
Cited by
Compston, A., & Coles, A. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08220-x · Cited by 1,743
Multiple Sclerosis: An Immune or Neurodegenerative Disorder?
Trapp, B. D., & Nave, K.-A. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313 · Cited by 1,724
Peterson, J. W., Bö, L., Mörk, S., Chang, A., & Trapp, B. D. (2001) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.1123 · Cited by 1,403
Virtual hypoxia and chronic necrosis of demyelinated axons in multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., & Stys, P. K. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70043-2 · Cited by 621
Evidence for widespread axonal damage at the earliest clinical stage of multiple sclerosis
Filippi, M. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg038 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudick, R. A., Fisher, E., Lee, J.-C., Simon, J., Jacobs, L., & the Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1698-1698
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2132228594
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1698
- The paper
- Rudick, R. A., Fisher, E., Lee, J.-C., Simon, J., Jacobs, L., & the Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. (1999). Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.8.1698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.