The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intravenous lidocaine in central pain: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of systemic administration of lidocaine on different components of neuropathic central pains by quantitative sensory testing. METHODS: The efficacy of systemic lidocaine (5 mg/kg IV over 30 minutes) was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, and cross-over fashion, on both spontaneous ongoing pain and evoked pains (allodynia and hyperalgesia) in 16 patients with chronic poststroke (n = 6) or spinal cord injury (n = 10) related pain. RESULTS: Lidocaine was significantly superior to the placebo (saline) in reducing the intensity of spontaneous ongoing pain for up to 45 minutes after the injection: 10 of 16 patients (62.5%) receiving lidocaine showed a significant reduction in spontaneous pain, whereas only six patients showed this after the placebo. Lidocaine also significantly reduced the intensity of brush-induced allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia, but was no better than the placebo against thermal allodynia and hyperalgesia. In general, the side effects were moderate and consisted mainly of lightheadedness (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic lidocaine can induce a significant and selective reduction of several components of pain caused by CNS injuries. The observed preferential antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of this drug suggest a selective central action on the mechanisms underlying these evoked pains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
Bouhassira, D., Attal, N., Fermanian, J., Alchaar, H., Gautron, M., Masquelier, E., Rostaing, S., Lanteri-Minet, M., Collin, E., Grisart, J., et al. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.024 · Cited by 1,329
Self-citationAllodynia and hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain: clinical manifestations and mechanisms
Jensen, T. S., & Finnerup, N. B. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70102-4 · Cited by 976
Siddall, P. J., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00452-9 · Cited by 964
Demant, D. T., Lund, K., Vollert, J., Maier, C., Segerdahl, M., Finnerup, N. B., Jensen, T. S., & Sindrup, S. H. (2014) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.014 · Cited by 440
Bouhassira, D., Wilhelm, S., Schacht, A., Perrot, S., Kosek, E., Cruccu, G., Freynhagen, R., Tesfaye, S., Lledó, A., Choy, E., et al. (2014) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.020 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Attal, N., Gaudé, V., Brasseur, L., Dupuy, M., Guirimand, F., Parker, F., & Bouhassira, D.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2000-02-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 564-564
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2146558764
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intravenous lidocaine in central pain: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.3.564
- The paper
- Attal, N., Gaudé, V., Brasseur, L., Dupuy, M., Guirimand, F., Parker, F., & Bouhassira, D. (2000). Intravenous lidocaine in central pain: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.3.564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.