Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiation of atypical parkinsonian syndromes with routine MRI

Schrag, A., Good, C.D., Miszkiel, K., Morris, H.R., Mathias, C.J., Lees, A.J., Quinn, N.P.·2000·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of routine MRI in differentiating between patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and control subjects. METHODS: Two neuroradiologists rated blindly and independently axial T2-weighted and proton density MR images of 54 patients with MSA, 35 patients with PSP, 5 patients with CBD, and 44 control subjects. RESULTS: More than 70% of patients with PSP and more than 80% of patients with cerebellar predominant MSA could be classified correctly with 0.5-T or 1.5-T scans, and no patient in these groups was misclassified. In the remaining patients an unequivocal differentiation could not be made. However, only approximately 50% of patients with parkinsonism-predominant MSA could be classified correctly, and 19% of them (all of whom had had 0.5-T scans) were misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristic findings on routine MRI, either 1.5 T or 0.5 T, can contribute to the identification of MSA and PSP. However, in a minority of patients no unequivocal diagnosis can be made using MRI findings alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.54.3.697

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550200007003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/jnnp.65.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6641-3_8 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/mds.870020404 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF02278121 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/jon199664222 · DOI
  7. 10.1212/WNL.53.3.502 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1212/WNL.38.7.1031 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/brain/117.4.835 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1212/WNL.48.1.119 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1212/WNL.39.11.1524 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1159/000116784 · doi:10.1159/000116784
  13. 10.1136/jnnp.57.9.1047 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1017/S0317167100033473 · DOI
  15. 10.1001/archneur.56.2.225 · DOI

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Schrag, A., Good, C. D., Miszkiel, K., Morris, H. R., Mathias, C. J., Lees, A. J., & Quinn, N. P.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-02-08
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
697-697
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2046513343
Cited by
420
References
3
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation of atypical parkinsonian syndromes with routine MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.3.697
The paper
Schrag, A., Good, C. D., Miszkiel, K., Morris, H. R., Mathias, C. J., Lees, A. J., & Quinn, N. P. (2000). Differentiation of atypical parkinsonian syndromes with routine MRI. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.3.697

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.