The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From spinal shock to spasticity: Neuronal adaptations to a spinal cord injury
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the adaptational changes in excitability of spinal neuronal circuits below the level of lesion from spinal shock to spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: More than 6 months after an acute SCI, clinical follow-up examinations were paralleled by electrophysiologic recordings with tibial nerve stimulation (M-wave, F-wave, H-reflex, and flexor reflex). RESULTS: During spinal shock, the loss of tendon tap reflexes and flaccid muscle tone were associated with low persistence of F-waves and loss of flexor reflexes, whereas H-reflexes were already elicitable. During the transition to spasticity, the reappearance of tendon tap reflexes and muscle tone and the occurrence of spasms was associated with the recovery of F-waves and flexor reflex excitability, whereas the H-to-M ratio remained about stable over months. At later stages (2 to 6 months after SCI) when clinical signs of spasticity became established, the electrophysiologic measures showed little change. In paraplegic patients, in contrast to tetraplegic patients, M-wave and flexor reflex amplitudes even decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The late decrease in M-wave and flexor reflex amplitude in paraplegic patients suggests a secondary impairment/degeneration of premotoneuronal circuits and of motoneurons. The divergent course of clinical signs of spasticity and their probable neuronal correlates indicates the occurrence of non-neuronal changes contributing to spasticity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: a nugget of this multiply cascade
Oyinbo, C. (2011) · Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis · doi:10.55782/ane-2011-1848 · Cited by 786
Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: Paresis and soft tissue changes
Gracies, J. (2005) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20284 · Cited by 658
Spastic movement disorder: impaired reflex function and altered muscle mechanics
Dietz, V., & Sinkjaer, T. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70193-x · Cited by 587
Self-citationSpinal shock revisited: a four-phase model
Ditunno, J. F., Little, J. W., Tessler, A., & Burns, A. S. (2004) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101603 · Cited by 441
Locomotor activity in spinal cord-injured persons
Dietz, V., & Harkema, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00942.2003 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hiersemenzel, L.-P., Curt, A., & Dietz, V.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2000-04-25
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1574-1582
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2055187509
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From spinal shock to spasticity: Neuronal adaptations to a spinal cord injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.8.1574
- The paper
- Hiersemenzel, L.-P., Curt, A., & Dietz, V. (2000). From spinal shock to spasticity: Neuronal adaptations to a spinal cord injury. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.8.1574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.