The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weight change associated with valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and magnitude of change in body weight associated with lamotrigine or divalproex sodium monotherapy in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind study with 8-week escalation phase and 24-week maintenance phase was conducted. Target maintenance dosage was 200 mg/day (lamotrigine) and 20 mg/kg/day (valproic acid), with adjustment from 100 to 500 mg/day (lamotrigine) and 10 to 60 mg/kg/day (valproate) based on investigators' judgment. Eligible patients were > or = 12 years old with new-onset or previously diagnosed partial or generalized seizures. Weight change was primary and seizure frequency and tolerance were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: For the lamotrigine group, 65 patients (mean age 34.5 years) were investigated; for the valproate group, 68 patients (mean age 30.1 years) were investigated. Weight remained stable in lamotrigine-treated patients. Significant weight gain occurred in valproate-treated patients by the 10th week of treatment; weight continued to increase throughout the study. After 32 weeks of treatment, mean weight gain was significantly higher in valproate-treated (12.8 +/- 9.3 lb) than lamotrigine-treated (1.3 +/- 11.9 lb) patients. Similar proportions of patients in lamotrigine (29%) and valproate (26%) groups were seizure-free. Overall frequency of adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups. Mean time to withdrawal from the study due to adverse events was 103 +/- 70 days for the lamotrigine group and 79 +/- 48 days for the valproate group. CONCLUSION: Valproate monotherapy was associated with significantly greater weight gain than lamotrigine monotherapy. Weight gain associated with valproate was significant within 10 weeks after initiating therapy and continued throughout the study. Efficacy of lamotrigine was comparable with that of valproate; lamotrigine tended to be better tolerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women
Colditz, G. A., Willett, W. C., Rotnitzky, A., & Manson, J. E. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-7-199504010-00001 · Cited by 2,064
Weight, Weight Change, and Coronary Heart Disease in Women: Risk Within the 'Normal' Weight Range
Willett, W. C. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520300035033 · Cited by 924
Cited by
Weight gain as an adverse effect of some commonly prescribed drugs: a systematic review
Leslie, W. S., Hankey, C. R., & Lean, M. E. J. (2007) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcm044 · Cited by 173
Medications that cause weight gain and alternatives in Canada: a narrative review
Wharton, S., Raiber, L., Serodio, K., Lee, J., & Christensen, R. A. (2018) · Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dmso.s171365 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Biton, V., Mirza, W., Montouris, G., Vuong, A., Hammer, A. E., & Barrett, P. S.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-01-23
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-177
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2140131270
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weight change associated with valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.56.2.172
- The paper
- Biton, V., Mirza, W., Montouris, G., Vuong, A., Hammer, A. E., & Barrett, P. S. (2001). Weight change associated with valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.56.2.172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.