Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations

Ciccarelli, O., Werring, D.J., Wheeler–Kingshott, C.A.M., Barker, G.J., Parker, G.J.M., Thompson, A.J., Miller, D.H.·2001·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively investigate water diffusion changes in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and gray matter in patients with MS, and to evaluate whether these changes are correlated with clinical disability and disease duration. BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging provides quantitative information about the magnitude and directionality (anisotropy) of water diffusion in vivo and detects pathologic changes in MS brain tissue. METHODS: Diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 39 patients with MS and in 21 age-matched control subjects. Quantitative indices, including fractional anisotropy, volume ratio, and mean diffusivity, were obtained in 30 regions of interest located in normal-appearing basal ganglia, cerebellar gray matter, and supratentorial and infratentorial NAWM. RESULTS: Patients with MS showed significantly reduced anisotropy and a trend toward increased diffusivity in the infratentorial and supratentorial NAWM, and significantly increased anisotropy in the basal ganglia. In all patients with MS, both fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity in the cerebral peduncles were inversely correlated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale and pyramidal functional scores. In patients with relapsing-remitting MS, there was a strong correlation between Expanded Disability Status Scale score and fractional anisotropy in both supratentorial and infratentorial NAWM. In primary and secondary progressive MS, disease duration correlated strongly with mean diffusivity in infratentorial NAWM and fractional anisotropy in the cerebral peduncles, respectively. CONCLUSION: The most striking finding of decreased fractional anisotropy in supratentorial and infratentorial NAWM and increased fractional anisotropy in basal ganglia may result from axonal degeneration due to fiber transection in remote focal lesions. Diffusion tensor imaging indices, in particular fractional anisotropy, appear sensitive to structural damage in NAWM that is associated with disability and progression in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.56.7.926

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Ciccarelli, O., Werring, D. J., Wheeler–Kingshott, C. A. M., Barker, G. J., Parker, G. J. M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2001-04-10
Volume
56
Issue
7
Pages
926-933
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2013091225
Cited by
349
References
43
FWCI
18.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.56.7.926
The paper
Ciccarelli, O., Werring, D. J., Wheeler–Kingshott, C. A. M., Barker, G. J., Parker, G. J. M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2001). Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.56.7.926

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.