Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

[ 123 I]β-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression

Marek, K., Innis, R., van Dyck, C., Fussell, B., Early, M., Eberly, S., Oakes, D., Seibyl, J.·2001·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: [123I]beta-CIT and SPECT imaging of the dopamine transporter is a sensitive biomarker of PD onset and severity. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors examine the change in [123I]beta-CIT uptake in sequential SPECT scans to assess the rate of progression of the dopaminergic terminal loss in patients with PD. METHODS: Patients with PD (n = 32) and healthy controls (n = 24) recruited from the Yale Movement Disorders Center underwent repeat [123I]beta-CIT SPECT imaging during a 1- to 4-year period. The primary imaging outcome was the ratio of specific to nondisplaceable striatal activity. Disease severity was assessed by Hoehn and Yahr staging, and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale after 12 hours off drug. RESULTS: Sequential SPECT scans in PD subjects demonstrated a decline in [123I]beta-CIT striatal uptake of approximately 11.2%/year from the baseline scan, compared with 0.8%/year in the healthy controls (p < 0.001). Although [123I]beta-CIT striatal uptake in the PD subjects was correlated with clinical severity, the annual percentage loss of [123I]beta-CIT striatal uptake did not correlate with the annual loss in measures of clinical function. CONCLUSIONS: - The rate of dopaminergic loss in PD is significantly greater than that of healthy controls, and [123I]beta-CIT SPECT imaging provides a quantitative biomarker for the progressive nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration in PD. As new protective and restorative therapies for PD are developed, dopamine transporter imaging offers the potential to provide an objective endpoint for these therapeutic trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.57.11.2089

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Marek, K., Innis, R., van Dyck, C., Fussell, B., Early, M., Eberly, S., Oakes, D., & Seibyl, J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2001-12
Volume
57
Issue
11
Pages
2089-2094
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2099967870
Cited by
347
References
2
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: [ 123 I]β-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.57.11.2089
The paper
Marek, K., Innis, R., van Dyck, C., Fussell, B., Early, M., Eberly, S., Oakes, D., & Seibyl, J. (2001). [ 123 I]β-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.11.2089

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.