The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
[ 123 I]β-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression
Abstract
BACKGROUND: [123I]beta-CIT and SPECT imaging of the dopamine transporter is a sensitive biomarker of PD onset and severity. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors examine the change in [123I]beta-CIT uptake in sequential SPECT scans to assess the rate of progression of the dopaminergic terminal loss in patients with PD. METHODS: Patients with PD (n = 32) and healthy controls (n = 24) recruited from the Yale Movement Disorders Center underwent repeat [123I]beta-CIT SPECT imaging during a 1- to 4-year period. The primary imaging outcome was the ratio of specific to nondisplaceable striatal activity. Disease severity was assessed by Hoehn and Yahr staging, and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale after 12 hours off drug. RESULTS: Sequential SPECT scans in PD subjects demonstrated a decline in [123I]beta-CIT striatal uptake of approximately 11.2%/year from the baseline scan, compared with 0.8%/year in the healthy controls (p < 0.001). Although [123I]beta-CIT striatal uptake in the PD subjects was correlated with clinical severity, the annual percentage loss of [123I]beta-CIT striatal uptake did not correlate with the annual loss in measures of clinical function. CONCLUSIONS: - The rate of dopaminergic loss in PD is significantly greater than that of healthy controls, and [123I]beta-CIT SPECT imaging provides a quantitative biomarker for the progressive nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration in PD. As new protective and restorative therapies for PD are developed, dopamine transporter imaging offers the potential to provide an objective endpoint for these therapeutic trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
Rascol, O., Brooks, D. J., Korczyn, A. D., De Deyn, P. P., Clarke, C. E., & Lang, A. E. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005183422004 · Cited by 1,539
Cited by
The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease
Tolosa, E., Wenning, G., & Poewe, W. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(05)70285-4 · Cited by 902
Alexander, G. E. (2004) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2004.6.3/galexander · Cited by 523
Staging Neurodegenerative Disorders: Structural, Regional, Biomarker, and Functional Progressions
Archer, T., Kostrzewa, R. M., Beninger, R. J., & Palomo, T. (2011) · Neurotoxicity Research · doi:10.1007/s12640-010-9190-2 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Marek, K., Innis, R., van Dyck, C., Fussell, B., Early, M., Eberly, S., Oakes, D., & Seibyl, J.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2089-2094
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2099967870
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: [ 123 I]β-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.57.11.2089
- The paper
- Marek, K., Innis, R., van Dyck, C., Fussell, B., Early, M., Eberly, S., Oakes, D., & Seibyl, J. (2001). [ 123 I]β-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.11.2089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.