The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adverse long-term effects of brain radiotherapy in adult low-grade glioma patients
Abstract
To the Editor: We were struck by an article in Neurology 1 suggesting adverse effects of radiation therapy in patients with “low grade glioma.” This report, based on an initial experience in 160 patients, provides retrospective evidence that for survivors there is some risk of cognitive dysfunction in patients who for the most part received radiation therapy using techniques that have been abandoned for more than 10 years. The authors note themselves that this retrospective report “cannot exclude the possibility that patients with poor performance and more anaplastic tumors were selected for radiation therapy.” We believe the striking issue, not discussed by the current report, was the overall very poor outcome for patients with low-grade glioma. It should be noted that the patients included were Grade 1 (pilocytic astrocytoma) and represented a mixed series of astrocytic, oligoastrocytic, or pure oligodendrogial tumors, some of which contained anaplastic foci (clearly not low-grade). Patients were treated with a variety of techniques. At the time of the review, the vast majority of the patients had died of progression of their disease, and the median survival was approximately 7 years. This is in line with other reports detailing the dismal prognosis of patients erroneously called “low-grade glioma patients.” Most of these patients had whole-brain radiation therapy, a technique that was abandoned in clinical trials for malignant glioma over a decade ago. The type of radiation therapy (linear accelerator, cobalt, etc.) is not specified. The influence of resection cannot be defined. The cause of death is also …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Karim, A. B. M. F., Maat, B., Hatlevoll, R., Menten, J., Rutten, E. H. J. M., Thomas, D. G. T., Mascarenhas, F., Horiot, J. C., Parvinen, L. M., van Reijn, M., et al. (1996) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00352-5 · Cited by 694
Cited by
Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction
Monje, M. L., Mizumatsu, S., Fike, J. R., & Palmer, T. D. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm749 · Cited by 1,271
Raber, J., Rola, R., LeFevour, A., Morhardt, D., Curley, J., Mizumatsu, S., VandenBerg, S. R., & Fike, J. R. (2004) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3206 · Cited by 708
Inverse association between cancer and Alzheimer's disease: results from the Framingham Heart Study
Driver, J. A., Beiser, A., Au, R., Kreger, B. E., Splansky, G. L., Kurth, T., Kiel, D. P., Lu, K. P., Seshadri, S., & Wolf, P. A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1442 · Cited by 425
Pace, A., Vidiri, A., Galiè, E., Carosi, M., Telera, S., Cianciulli, A. M., Canalini, P., Giannarelli, D., Jandolo, B., & Carapella, C. M. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg502 · Cited by 263
Schaff, L. R., & Lassman, A. B. (2015) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.02.008 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Lunsford, L. D., & Kondziolka, D.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2150-2151
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2102108000
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse long-term effects of brain radiotherapy in adult low-grade glioma patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.57.11.2150-a
- The paper
- Lunsford, L. D., & Kondziolka, D. (2001). Adverse long-term effects of brain radiotherapy in adult low-grade glioma patients. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.11.2150-a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.