Cited by 425Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Inverse association between cancer and Alzheimer's disease: results from the Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Driver, J. A., Beiser, A., Au, R., Kreger, B. E., Splansky, G. L., Kurth, T., Kiel, D. P., Lu, K. P. +2 more·2012·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To relate cancer since entry into the Framingham Heart Study with the risk of incident Alzheimer's disease and to estimate the risk of incident cancer among participants with and without Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: Community based prospective cohort study; nested age and sex matched case-control study. SETTING: Framingham Heart Study, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 1278 participants with and without a history of cancer who were aged 65 or more and free of dementia at baseline (1986-90). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risks of Alzheimer's disease and cancer. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 10 years, 221 cases of probable Alzheimer's disease were diagnosed. Cancer survivors had a lower risk of probable Alzheimer's disease (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.97), adjusted for age, sex, and smoking. The risk was lower among survivors of smoking related cancers (0.26, 0.08 to 0.82) than among survivors of non-smoking related cancers (0.82, 0.57 to 1.19). In contrast with their decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease, survivors of smoking related cancer had a substantially increased risk of stroke (2.18, 1.29 to 3.68). In the nested case-control analysis, participants with probable Alzheimer's disease had a lower risk of subsequent cancer (0.39, 0.26 to 0.58) than reference participants, as did participants with any Alzheimer's disease (0.38) and any dementia (0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors had a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease than those without cancer, and patients with Alzheimer's disease had a lower risk of incident cancer. The risk of Alzheimer's disease was lowest in survivors of smoking related cancers, and was not primarily explained by survival bias. This pattern for cancer is similar to that seen in Parkinson's disease and suggests an inverse association between cancer and neurodegeneration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.e1442

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AD patients have a decreased incidence of cancer, with up to a 50% decrease reported.

    “Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have a decreased incidence of cancer.”

    From Alzheimer's Disease–Associated Amyloid-β Precursor Protein Prevents Aging Stress–Induced Mitophagy and Fumarate Depletion to Improve Antitumor Immunity (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Results (Incident Alzheimer’s disease and risk of cancer) report a lower risk of subsequent cancer among participants with probable Alzheimer’s disease, supporting the printed citing sentence. The added claim of a decrease of ‘up to 50%’ does not match the reported estimate: the risk ratio was 0.39, corresponding to a 61% decrease. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Apparent protective associations with AD may in part reflect competing risks, recruiting bias, or survivor bias in populations with elevated vascular morbidity.

    “Apparent protective associations with AD may, in part, reflect competing risks, recruiting bias, or survivor bias in populations with elevated vascular morbidity [18,19].”

    From Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential as an Emerging Interdisciplinary Risk Factor in Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion (Strengths and limitations; page unavailable) acknowledges that participants with long follow-up are a selected population and that survival bias cannot be fully excluded. But it says the observed inverse association was not primarily due to survival bias during follow-up. The paper does not specifically attribute the association to competing risks or recruitment bias in populations with elevated vascular morbidity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [1]Corsellis J. Mental illness and the ageing brain. Oxford University Press, 1962.
  2. [2]DeSouky AL. The relationship between cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 1075. 1401685
  3. [3]Roe CM, Behrens MI, Xiong C, Miller JP, Morris JC. Alzheimer disease and cancer. Neurology 2005; 64: 895-8. 15753432
  4. [4]Roe CM, Fitzpatrick AL, Xiong C, Sieh W, Kuller L, Miller JP, et al. Cancer linked to Alzheimer disease but not vascular dementia. Neurology 2010; 74: 106-12. 20032288 PMC2809029
  5. [5]Tirumalasetti F, Han L, Birkett DP. The relationship between cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 840. 2071819
  6. [6]Yamada M, Sasaki H, Mimori Y, Kasagi F, Sudoh S, Ikeda J, et al. Prevalence and risks of dementia in the Japanese population: RERF’s adult health study of Hiroshima subjects. Radiation Effects Research Foundation. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 189-95. 9988290
  7. [7]Bajaj A, Driver JA, Schernhammer ES. Parkinson’s disease and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2010; 21: 697-707. 20054708
  8. [8]Driver JA, Kurth T, Buring JE, Gaziano JM, Logroscino G. Prospective case-control study of nonfatal cancer preceding the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Cancer Causes Control 2007; 18: 705-11. 17562193
  9. [9]Driver JA, Logroscino G, Buring JE, Gaziano JM, Kurth T. A prospective cohort study of cancer incidence following the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16: 1260-5. 17548694
  10. [10]Elbaz A, Peterson BJ, Bower JH, Yang P, Maraganore DM, McDonnell SK, et al. Risk of cancer after the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: a historical cohort study. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 719-25. 15704188
  11. [11]Elbaz A, Peterson BJ, Yang P, Van Gerpen JA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, et al. Nonfatal cancer preceding Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 157-64. 11880756
  12. [12]Olsen JH, Friis S, Frederiksen K, McLaughlin JK, Mellemkjaer L, Moller H. Atypical cancer pattern in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 201-5. 15583688 PMC2361753
  13. [13]Olsen JH, Tangerud K, Wermuth L, Frederiksen K, Friis S. Treatment with levodopa and risk for malignant melanoma. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 1252-7. 17534943
  14. [14]Behrens MI, Lendon C, Roe CM. A common biological mechanism in cancer and Alzheimer’s disease? Curr Alzheimer Res 2009; 6: 196-204. 19519301 PMC2810550
  15. [15]Driver JA, Lu KP. Pin1: a new genetic link between Alzheimer’s disease, cancer and aging. Curr Aging Sci 2010; 3: 158-65. 20735350
  16. [16]Husseman JW, Nochlin D, Vincent I. Mitotic activation: a convergent mechanism for a cohort of neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Aging 2000; 21: 815-28. 11124425
  17. [17]Lu KP. Pinning down cell signaling, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Biochem Sci 2004; 29: 200-9. 15082314
  18. [18]Lu KP, Liou YC, Vincent I. Proline-directed phosphorylation and isomerization in mitotic regulation and in Alzheimer’s disease. Bioessays 2003; 25: 174-81. 12539244
  19. [19]Raina AK, Zhu X, Rottkamp CA, Monteiro M, Takeda A, Smith MA. Cyclin’ toward dementia: cell cycle abnormalities and abortive oncogenesis in Alzheimer disease. J Neurosci Res 2000; 61: 128-33. 10878584
  20. [20]Staropoli JF. Tumorigenesis and neurodegeneration: two sides of the same coin? Bioessays 2008; 30: 719-27. 18623069
  21. [21]Wang W, Bu B, Xie M, Zhang M, Yu Z, Tao D. Neural cell cycle dysregulation and central nervous system diseases. Prog Neurobiol 2009; 89: 1-17. 19619927
  22. [22]West AB, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. To die or grow: Parkinson’s disease and cancer. Trends Neurosci 2005; 28: 348-52. 15913799
  23. [23]Bennett DA. Is there a link between cancer and Alzheimer disease? Neurology 2010; 75: 1216-7. 20922851
  24. [24]Marwill SL, Freund KM, Barry PP. Patient factors associated with breast cancer screening among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 1210-4. 8856000
  25. [25]Scherder E, Bouma A, Borkent M, Rahman O. Alzheimer patients report less pain intensity and pain affect than non-demented elderly. Psychiatry 1999; 62: 265-72. 10612117
  26. [26]Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE Jr. Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1951; 41: 279-81. 14819398 PMC1525365
  27. [27]Kreger BE, Splansky GL, Schatzkin A. The cancer experience in the Framingham Heart Study cohort. Cancer 1991; 67: 1-6. 1845934
  28. [28]Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98. 1202204
  29. [29]McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939-44. 6610841
  30. [30]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004. 20669512
  31. [32]Seshadri S, Drachman DA, Lippa CF. Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele and the lifetime risk of Alzheimer’s disease. What physicians know, and what they should know. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 1074-9. 7487559
  32. [35]Rusanen M, Kivipelto M, Quesenberry CP Jr, Zhou J, Whitmer RA. Heavy smoking in midlife and long-term risk of Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 333-9. 20975015
  33. [36]Van Heemst D, Mooijaart SP, Beekman M, Schreuder J, de Craen AJ, Brandt BW, et al. Variation in the human TP53 gene affects old age survival and cancer mortality. Exp Gerontol 2005; 40: 11-5. 15732191
  34. [37]Lu KP, Hanes SD, Hunter T. A human peptidyl-prolyl isomerase essential for regulation of mitosis. Nature 1996; 380: 544-7. 8606777
  35. [38]Lu KP, Zhou XZ. The prolyl isomerase PIN1: a pivotal new twist in phosphorylation signalling and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8: 904-16. 17878917
  36. [39]Bao L, Sauter G, Sowadski J, Lu KP, Wang D. Prevalent overexpression of prolyl isomerase Pin1 in human cancers. Am J Pathol 2004; 164: 1727-37. 15111319 PMC1615639
  37. [40]Liou Y-C, Sun A, Ryo A, Zhou XZ, Yu Z-X, Huang H-K, et al. Role of the prolyl isomerase Pin1 in protecting against age-dependent neurodegeneration. Nature 2003; 424: 556-61. 12891359
  38. [42]Sultana R, Boyd-Kimball D, Poon HF, Cai J, Pierce WM, Klein JB, et al. Oxidative modification and down-regulation of Pin1 in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus: a redox proteomics analysis. Neurobiol Aging 2006; 27: 918-25. 15950321
  39. [43]Wulf G, Garg P, Liou YC, Iglehart D, Lu KP. Modeling breast cancer in vivo and ex vivo reveals an essential role of Pin1 in tumorigenesis. EMBO J 2004; 23: 3397-407. 15257284 PMC514501
  40. [44]Lim J, Balastik M, Lee TH, Nakamura K, Liou YC, Sun A, et al. Pin1 has opposite effects on wild-type and P301L tau stability and tauopathy. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 1877-89. 18431510 PMC2323189
  41. [45]Segat L, Pontillo A, Annoni G, Trabattoni D, Vergani C, Clerici M, et al. PIN1 promoter polymorphisms are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2007; 28: 69-74. 16384626
  42. [46]Lu J, Hu Z, Wei S, Wang LE, Liu Z, El-Naggar AK, et al. A novel functional variant (-842G>C) in the PIN1 promoter contributes to decreased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by diminishing the promoter activity. Carcinogenesis 2009; 30: 1717-21. 19625347 PMC2757547
  43. [47]Zotova E, Nicoll JA, Kalaria R, Holmes C, Boche D. Inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: relevance to pathogenesis and therapy. Alzheimers Res Ther 2010; 2: 1. 20122289 PMC2874260
  44. [48]Webber KM, Raina AK, Marlatt MW, Zhu X, Prat MI, Morelli L, et al. The cell cycle in Alzheimer disease: a unique target for neuropharmacology. Mech Ageing Dev 2005; 126: 1019-25. 15936057
  45. [49]Seigers R, Fardell JE. Neurobiological basis of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment: a review of rodent research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011; 35: 729-41. 20869395
  46. [50]Heck JE, Albert SM, Franco R, Gorin SS. Patterns of dementia diagnosis in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results breast cancer survivors who use chemotherapy. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 1687-92. 18691280
  47. [51]Baxter NN, Durham SB, Phillips KA, Habermann EB, Virning BA. Risk of dementia in older breast cancer survivors: a population-based cohort study of the association with adjuvant chemotherapy. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 403-11. 19278395
  48. [52]Surma-aho O, Niemela M, Vilkki J, Kouri M, Brander A, Salonen O, et al. Adverse long-term effects of brain radiotherapy in adult low-grade glioma patients. Neurology 2001; 56: 1285-90. 11376174

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driver, J. A., Beiser, A., Au, R., Kreger, B. E., Splansky, G. L., Kurth, T., Kiel, D. P., Lu, K. P., Seshadri, S., & Wolf, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Driver, J. A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-03-12
Volume
344
Issue
mar12 1
Pages
e1442-e1442
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2106285225
Cited by
425
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 9
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-16495, AG08122, R01AG016495, R01AG008122)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195, AG08122, N01-HC-025195, AG16495)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17950, R01NS017950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cancer, cancer survivors, tobacco-related cancer, stroke risk, dementia, neurodegeneration, cancer incidence, survivorship bias, Parkinson's disease
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Smoking, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review