The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the development of ipsilateral corticospinal projections from birth and compare to 1) development of contralateral projections in the same subjects and 2) ipsilateral corticospinal projections in subjects with unilateral lesions of the corticospinal system acquired perinatally or in adulthood. METHOD: Transcranial magnetic stimulation excited the motor cortex, and responses were recorded bilaterally in pectoralis major, biceps brachii, and the first dorsal interosseus muscles. Subjects studied included 9 neonates recruited at birth, studied longitudinally for 2 years; 85 healthy subjects aged from birth to adulthood; 10 subjects with hemiplegic cerebral palsy; and 8 with hemiplegia after stroke. RESULTS: In neonates, ipsilateral responses had significantly shorter onsets than contralateral responses but similar thresholds and amplitudes. Thresholds within both pathways increased in the first 3 months. Differential development was present from 3 months so that by 18 months ipsilateral responses were significantly smaller and had significantly higher thresholds and longer onset latencies than contralateral responses. A similar pattern of smaller and later ipsilateral responses was observed after transcranial magnetic stimulation of the intact cortex in subjects with stroke. In contrast, subjects with hemiplegic cerebral palsy had ipsilateral responses with onsets, thresholds and amplitudes similar to those of contralateral responses. Significant branching of contralateral corticospinal axons from the intact motor cortex was excluded by cross-correlation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These data, together with previously published anatomic and radiologic studies, are consistent with activity-dependent corticospinal axonal withdrawal during development and maintenance of increased corticomotoneuronal projections from the intact hemisphere after unilateral perinatal lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Normal development of brain circuits
Tau, G. Z., & Peterson, B. S. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.115 · Cited by 1,391
Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: What is happening when?
de Graaf-Peters, V. B., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2006) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.013 · Cited by 559
Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs
Carson, R. G. (2005) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.03.005 · Cited by 384
The Corticospinal System: From Development to Motor Control
Martin, J. H. (2005) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858404270843 · Cited by 358
Krägeloh-Mann, I., & Cans, C. (2009) · Brain and Development · doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2009.03.009 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Eyre, J. A., Taylor, J. P., Villagra, F., Smith, M., & Miller, S.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-11-13
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1543-1554
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2169240629
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.57.9.1543
- The paper
- Eyre, J. A., Taylor, J. P., Villagra, F., Smith, M., & Miller, S. (2001). Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.9.1543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.