Prevalence of cognitive impairment: Data from the Indianapolis Study of Health and Aging
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and natural history of cognitive impairment that is not dementia is important to the understanding of normal aging and dementia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and outcome of cognitive impairment that is not dementia in an elderly African American population. METHOD: A two-phase, longitudinal study of aging and dementia. A total of 2212 community-dwelling African American residents of Indianapolis, IN, aged 65 and older were screened, and a subset (n = 351) received full clinical assessment and diagnosis. Subsets of the clinically assessed were seen again for clinical assessment and rediagnosis at 18 and 48 months. Weighted logistic regression was used to generate age-specific prevalence estimates. RESULTS: The overall rate of cognitive impairment among community-dwelling elderly was 23.4%. Age-specific rates indicate increasing prevalence with increasing age: 19.2% for ages 65 to 74 years, 27.6% for ages 75 to 84 years, and 38.0% for ages 85+ years. The most frequent cause of cognitive impairment was medically unexplained memory loss with a community prevalence of 12.5%, followed by medical illness-associated cognitive impairment (4.0% prevalence), stroke (3.6% prevalence), and alcohol abuse (1.5% prevalence). At 18-month follow-up, 26% (17/66) of the subjects had become demented. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment short of dementia affects nearly one in four community-dwelling elders and is a major risk factor for later development of dementia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prevalence of memory problems and IGT rise with age.
“The prevalence of memory problems and IGT rise with age (1, 9, 10).”
From Reduced glucose tolerance is associated with poor memory performance and hippocampal atrophy among normal elderly (2003) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 312
- Authors
- Unverzagt, F. W., Gao, S., Baiyewu, O., Ogunniyi, A. O., Gureje, O., Perkins, A., Emsley, C. L., Dickens, J., Evans, R., Musick, B., Hall, K. S., Hui, S. L., & Hendrie, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Regenstrief Institute (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-11-13
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1655-1662
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1999130510
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG010133, R01AG009956)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- cognitive impairment, prevalence, African American older adults, community-dwelling older adults, stroke, alcohol abuse, dementia risk, normal aging, age-specific prevalence, natural history (disease)
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Black or African American, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Indiana, Male, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Black People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review