Cited by 312Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Prevalence of cognitive impairment: Data from the Indianapolis Study of Health and Aging

Unverzagt, F. W., Gao, S., Baiyewu, O., Ogunniyi, A. O., Gureje, O., Perkins, A., Emsley, C. L., Dickens, J. +5 more·2001·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and natural history of cognitive impairment that is not dementia is important to the understanding of normal aging and dementia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and outcome of cognitive impairment that is not dementia in an elderly African American population. METHOD: A two-phase, longitudinal study of aging and dementia. A total of 2212 community-dwelling African American residents of Indianapolis, IN, aged 65 and older were screened, and a subset (n = 351) received full clinical assessment and diagnosis. Subsets of the clinically assessed were seen again for clinical assessment and rediagnosis at 18 and 48 months. Weighted logistic regression was used to generate age-specific prevalence estimates. RESULTS: The overall rate of cognitive impairment among community-dwelling elderly was 23.4%. Age-specific rates indicate increasing prevalence with increasing age: 19.2% for ages 65 to 74 years, 27.6% for ages 75 to 84 years, and 38.0% for ages 85+ years. The most frequent cause of cognitive impairment was medically unexplained memory loss with a community prevalence of 12.5%, followed by medical illness-associated cognitive impairment (4.0% prevalence), stroke (3.6% prevalence), and alcohol abuse (1.5% prevalence). At 18-month follow-up, 26% (17/66) of the subjects had become demented. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment short of dementia affects nearly one in four community-dwelling elders and is a major risk factor for later development of dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.57.9.1655

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 312

Authors
Unverzagt, F. W., Gao, S., Baiyewu, O., Ogunniyi, A. O., Gureje, O., Perkins, A., Emsley, C. L., Dickens, J., Evans, R., Musick, B., Hall, K. S., Hui, S. L., & Hendrie, H. C.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2001-11-13
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
1655-1662
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1999130510
Cited by
312
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG010133, R01AG009956)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive impairment, prevalence, African American older adults, community-dwelling older adults, stroke, alcohol abuse, dementia risk, normal aging, age-specific prevalence, natural history (disease)
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Black or African American, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Indiana, Male, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review