Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cluster headache: A prospective clinical study with diagnostic implications

Bahra, Anish, May, Arne, Goadsby, Peter J.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

Background: Cluster headache, when compared with migraine or tension-type headache, is an uncommon form of primary neurovascular headache. However, with a prevalence of approximately 0.1% and a lengthy history of disabling and distressing episodic pain, cluster headache is an important neurologic problem. Methods: Patients (n = 230) were recruited from our specialist clinic (24%) or from support groups (76%). All patients had a detailed history taken by at least two physicians and were assigned diagnoses according to the International Headache Society Diagnostic Guidelines. Results: The pain characteristics were of a strictly unilateral, predominantly retro-orbital (92%) and temporal pain (70%). Of the cranial autonomic features, lacrimation (91%) was the most common. Nausea (50%), photophobia (56%), and phonophobia (43%) often were noted, as was a sense of agitation or restlessness in 93% of patients. Typical migrainous aura was noted in 14% of this cohort. Most patients (79%) had episodic cluster headache, which was largely the same clinically as chronic cluster headache except for the persistence of attacks over time. The overall male-to-female ratio in this sample was 2.5:1, and this has decreased with time. Neither oral contraceptive use, menses, menopause, nor hormone replacement therapy had any consistent effect on cluster headache in women. Less than half of the patients had tried injectable sumatriptan, and many had not tried high-flow oxygen. Several unproven preventative agents that usually are used in migraine and an array of alternative therapies had been used; none of the latter was consistently effective. Conclusion: Patients with cluster headache offer a population of primary headache patients with devastating acute attacks of pain. The syndrome is stereotyped with effective evidence-based treatments that are prescribed in only half of patients having cluster headache.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.58.3.354

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Bahra, A., May, A., & Goadsby, P. J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-02-12
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
354-361
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2076402267
Cited by
537
References
19
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cluster headache: A prospective clinical study with diagnostic implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.58.3.354
The paper
Bahra, A., May, A., & Goadsby, P. J. (2002). Cluster headache: A prospective clinical study with diagnostic implications. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.3.354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.