Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 595

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropsychiatric syndromes in lupus: Prevalence using standardized definitions

Brey, R. L., Holliday, S. L., Saklad, A. R., Navarrete, M. G., Hermosillo–Romo, D., Stallworth, C. L., Valdez, C. R., Escalante, A., del Rincón, I., Gronseth, G., Rhine, C. B., Padilla, P., McGlasson, D.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The San Antonio Lupus Study of Neuropsychiatric Disease is a longitudinal study designed to characterize the spectrum of and important risk factors for specific neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) syndromes. METHODS: Subjects must meet criteria for SLE and must be at least 18 years of age. A standardized medical history, neurologic, rheumatologic, and psychiatric examinations, computerized neuropsychological evaluation, and serologic testing are performed. RESULTS: This report is based on the first 128 subjects (120 women and 8 men) who completed the initial study visit. Data from this initial study visit were evaluated for the prevalence of NPSLE using the American College of Rheumatology case definitions for 19 NPSLE syndromes. One or more NPSLE syndromes were present in 80% of subjects: cerebrovascular disease (2, 2%; ischemic stroke); headaches (73, 57%); mononeuropathy (9, 8%; median 8, ulnar 1); movement disorder (1, 1%; chorea); neuropathy, cranial (2, 2%; trigeminal); polyneuropathy (29, 22%; sensorimotor); seizures (21, 16%; partial); anxiety disorder (27, 24%); major depressive-like episode (37, 28%); mood disorder with depressive features (21, 19%); mood disorder with manic features (3, 3%); mood disorder with mixed features (1, 1%); psychosis (6, 5%). In a subset of 67 patients who received standardized neuropsychological testing, 21% had normal results. In the remainder, the following levels of impairment were seen: 43% mild, 30% moderate, and 6% severe. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NPSLE was high in this cohort of unselected patients with SLE. Headaches, cognitive dysfunction, and psychiatric disorders were the most common NPSLE syndromes seen. These results will be easily comparable to other studies also using standardized diagnostic criteria. However, the lack of ethnicity and language-matched normative neuropsychological data may make comparisons of cognitive dysfunction in SLE populations difficult.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.58.8.1214

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 595

Metadata

Authors
Brey, R. L., Holliday, S. L., Saklad, A. R., Navarrete, M. G., Hermosillo–Romo, D., Stallworth, C. L., Valdez, C. R., Escalante, A., del Rincón, I., Gronseth, G., Rhine, C. B., Padilla, P., & McGlasson, D.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-04-23
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
1214-1220
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2147457110
Cited by
595
References
4
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychiatric syndromes in lupus: Prevalence using standardized definitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.58.8.1214
The paper
Brey, R. L., Holliday, S. L., Saklad, A. R., Navarrete, M. G., Hermosillo–Romo, D., Stallworth, C. L., Valdez, C. R., Escalante, A., del Rincón, I., Gronseth, G., Rhine, C. B., Padilla, P., & McGlasson, D. (2002). Neuropsychiatric syndromes in lupus: Prevalence using standardized definitions. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.8.1214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.