Cited by 75Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

A systematic review of behavioural changes in motor neuron disease

Raaphorst, Joost, Beeldman, Emma, De Visser, Marianne, De Haan, Rob J., Schmand, Ben·2012·Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Abstract

Motor neuron disease (MND) and the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are thought to be part of a disease spectrum. There is uncertainty about the frequency and characteristics of behavioural changes in MND, and similarly, about a relation between bvFTD and the site of onset of MND. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the publications on behavioural changes in MND. An extensive search for articles on behavioural changes in MND patients was performed. First, cohort studies of MND patients were reviewed to summarize the prevalence of bvFTD and mild behavioural changes. Secondly, data on bvFTD symptoms (mostly from case reports) of individual MND-bvFTD patients were used to analyse characteristics and pooled prevalences of bvFTD symptoms. In addition, site of onset, survival and demographic variables of MND-bvFTD patients were analysed. Results showed that in cohorts, 8.1% (95% CI 5.6 - 11.5%) of MND patients had bvFTD. In 170 individual patients with MND-bvFTD, perseveration (40%), apathy (29%) and disinhibition (26%) were the most frequently reported behavioural changes; 43% had memory disturbances and bulbar onset was found in 48%. In conclusion, 8% of MND patients have bvFTD, with perseveration being reported most frequently. MND-bvFTD is often accompanied by memory disturbances and is related to bulbar onset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17482968.2012.656652

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raaphorst, J., Beeldman, E., De Visser, M., De Haan, R. J., & Schmand, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology
  • Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Raaphorst, Joost
Venue
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
493-501
ISSN
  • 1471-180X (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-2968
OpenAlex
W2065577030
Cited by
75
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ulster University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
motor neuron disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, behavior change, perseveration, apathy, disinhibition, memory impairment, bulbar onset, disease spectrum, prevalence
MeSH terms
Behavior, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Databases, Factual, Motor Neuron Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review