The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact on Parkinson’s disease of electrical parameter settings in STN stimulation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The main advantage of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of PD is that the electrical settings can be adjusted to optimize benefits and minimize adverse effects. The main objective of this study was to discover how varying these electrical parameters impacted on parkinsonian motor signs. METHODS: Twelve patients with PD with chronic bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation were selected. The authors evaluated the effects of a variation in the voltages, frequencies, and pulse widths on tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity using two different paradigms: one in which the total electrical energy delivered was held constant, and one in which this was varied. Up to 26 parameter conditions were tested under double blind randomized conditions. RESULTS: Voltages >or=3 V and frequencies >or=130 Hz led to the greatest improvement in all three parkinsonian signs. A rate of 5 Hz significantly worsened akinesia. The combination of the highest voltage with the narrowest pulse width was most effective. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the most beneficial effects induced by STN stimulation are obtained at high frequencies and that voltage is the most critical factor to obtain adequate alteration in STN activity. The mechanisms by which STN DBS improves parkinsonism remain speculative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 · Cited by 8,527
Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses
Tehovnik, E. J. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(95)00131-x · Cited by 478
Treatment of tremor in Parkinson’s disease by subthalamic nucleus stimulation
Krack, P., Benazzouz, A., Pollak, P., Limousin, P., Piallat, B., Hoffmann, D., Xie, J., & Benabid, A. (1998) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.870130608 · Cited by 252
Self-citation
Cited by
Pathological synchronization in Parkinson's disease: networks, models and treatments
Hammond, C., Bergman, H., & Brown, P. (2007) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.004 · Cited by 1,629
Perlmutter, J. S., & Mink, J. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112824 · Cited by 1,073
Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease
Benabid, A. L. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,046
Self-citationNew insights into the relationship between dopamine, beta oscillations and motor function
Jenkinson, N., & Brown, P. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.09.003 · Cited by 659
Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation
Herrington, T. M., Cheng, J. J., & Eskandar, E. N. (2016) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00281.2015 · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Moro, E., Esselink, R. J. A., Xie, J., Hommel, M., Benabid, A. L., & Pollak, P.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2002-09-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 706-713
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2169815799
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact on Parkinson’s disease of electrical parameter settings in STN stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.59.5.706
- The paper
- Moro, E., Esselink, R. J. A., Xie, J., Hommel, M., Benabid, A. L., & Pollak, P. (2002). The impact on Parkinson’s disease of electrical parameter settings in STN stimulation. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.59.5.706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.