The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the magnitude and time course of the changes in water diffusion coefficient (D(av)) following newborn infant brain injury. METHODS: Ten newborn infants at high risk for perinatal brain injury were recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit. Conventional and diffusion tensor MRI was performed on three occasions during the first week of life. Regions of injury were determined by evaluating conventional MR images (T1, T2, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) at 1 week after injury. D(av) values were determined for these regions for all three scans. RESULTS: D(av) values were decreased in most infants 1 day after injury, but injury was not evident or underestimated in 4 of 10 infants despite the presence of injury on conventional imaging at 1 week. By the third day, D(av) values were decreased in injured areas in all infants, reaching a nadir of approximately 35% less than normal values. By the seventh day after injury, D(av) values were returning to normal (pseudonormalization). CONCLUSIONS: MR diffusion images (for which contrast is determined by changes in D(av)) obtained on the first day after injury do not necessarily show the full extent of ultimate injury in newborn infants. Images obtained between the second and fourth days of life reliably indicate the extent of injury. By the seventh day, diffusion MR is less sensitive to perinatal brain injury than conventional MR because of transient pseudonormalization of D(av). Overall, diffusion MR may not be suitable as a gold standard for detection of brain injury during the first day after injury in newborn infants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke
Warach, S., Chien, D., Li, W., Ronthal, M., & Edelman, R. R. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.9.1717 · Cited by 881
Cited by
Congenital heart disease and brain development
McQuillen, P. S., & Miller, S. P. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05116.x · Cited by 164
Wu, Y. W., Monsell, S. E., Glass, H. C., Wisnowski, J. L., Mathur, A. M., McKinstry, R. C., Bluml, S., Gonzalez, F. F., Comstock, B. A., Heagerty, P. J., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-023-02510-8 · Cited by 80
Self-citationAckerman, J. J. H., & Neil, J. J. (2010) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1530 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McKinstry, R. C., Miller, J. H., Snyder, A. Z., Mathur, A., Schefft, G. L., Almli, C. R., Shimony, J. S., Shiran, S. I., & Neil, J. J.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2002-09-24
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 824-833
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2019239946
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.59.6.824
- The paper
- McKinstry, R. C., Miller, J. H., Snyder, A. Z., Mathur, A., Schefft, G. L., Almli, C. R., Shimony, J. S., Shiran, S. I., & Neil, J. J. (2002). A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.59.6.824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.