Cited by 7Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibodies in postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) (P1.276)

Vernino, Steven, Hopkins, Steve, Okamoto, Luis, Black, Bonnie, Dorminy, Cindy, Paranjape, Sachin, Raj, Satish·2015·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and relevance of ganglionic AChR antibody in patients with POTS BACKGROUND: Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a common form of autonomic dysfunction characterized by inappropriate and excessive increase in heart rate when standing. The precise pathophysiology of POTS remains unclear, and several different etiologies may produce the same clinical syndrome. Association with various autoimmune disorders has been reported. In retrospective studies from the Mayo Clinic, low levels of ganglionic AChR antibodies were found in 7-14[percnt] of POTS patients. This seropositive rate may be artificially higher (due to retrospective referral bias) than the prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibody in routine clinical autonomic practice. DESIGN/METHODS: Through a patient support and advocacy group (Dysautonomia International), patients with dysautonomia were invited to participate in a study of serological markers for POTS. Patients (and healthy family members) provided clinical information, blood samples, and orthostatic vital signs. Blinded blood samples from 103 POTS patients and 66 healthy controls were tested for ganglionic AChR antibodies using validated radioimmunopreciptation assay. RESULTS: Five POTS patients (4.8[percnt]) and two healthy controls (3[percnt]) were positive for ganglionic AChR antibodies. Three of the subjects (2 POTS and one control) had very low antibody level (0.06 nmol/L; normal < 0.05). Antibody levels (0.08 - 0.11 nmo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.84.14_supplement.p1.276

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a cohort study of unselected POTS patients, the prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibodies (always at low antibody levels) was <5%, and this antibody frequency was not statistically different from population controls.

    “In a cohort study of unselected POTS patients, the prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibodies (always at low antibody levels) was <5%, and this antibody frequency was not statistically different from population controls (48,49).”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [48]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernino, S., Hopkins, S., Okamoto, L., Black, B., Dorminy, C., Paranjape, S., & Raj, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2015-04-06
Volume
84
Issue
14_supplement
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1481001728
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy, autonomic dysfunction, seroprevalence, antibody levels, orthostatic vital signs, autoimmune etiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review