Prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibodies in postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) (P1.276)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and relevance of ganglionic AChR antibody in patients with POTS BACKGROUND: Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a common form of autonomic dysfunction characterized by inappropriate and excessive increase in heart rate when standing. The precise pathophysiology of POTS remains unclear, and several different etiologies may produce the same clinical syndrome. Association with various autoimmune disorders has been reported. In retrospective studies from the Mayo Clinic, low levels of ganglionic AChR antibodies were found in 7-14[percnt] of POTS patients. This seropositive rate may be artificially higher (due to retrospective referral bias) than the prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibody in routine clinical autonomic practice. DESIGN/METHODS: Through a patient support and advocacy group (Dysautonomia International), patients with dysautonomia were invited to participate in a study of serological markers for POTS. Patients (and healthy family members) provided clinical information, blood samples, and orthostatic vital signs. Blinded blood samples from 103 POTS patients and 66 healthy controls were tested for ganglionic AChR antibodies using validated radioimmunopreciptation assay. RESULTS: Five POTS patients (4.8[percnt]) and two healthy controls (3[percnt]) were positive for ganglionic AChR antibodies. Three of the subjects (2 POTS and one control) had very low antibody level (0.06 nmol/L; normal < 0.05). Antibody levels (0.08 - 0.11 nmo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a cohort study of unselected POTS patients, the prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibodies (always at low antibody levels) was <5%, and this antibody frequency was not statistically different from population controls.
“In a cohort study of unselected POTS patients, the prevalence of ganglionic AChR antibodies (always at low antibody levels) was <5%, and this antibody frequency was not statistically different from population controls (48,49).”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome
Bryarly, M., Phillips, L. T., Fu, Q., Vernino, S., & Levine, B. D. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.059 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Self-citationPostural tachycardia syndrome – Diagnosis, physiology, and prognosis
Arnold, A. C., Ng, J., & Raj, S. R. (2018) · Autonomic Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2018.02.005 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationAutoimmunity in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: Current understanding
Vernino, S., & Stiles, L. E. (2018) · Autonomic Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2018.04.005 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Vernino, S., Hopkins, S., Okamoto, L., Black, B., Dorminy, C., Paranjape, S., & Raj, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2015-04-06
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 14_supplement
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1481001728
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy, autonomic dysfunction, seroprevalence, antibody levels, orthostatic vital signs, autoimmune etiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review